Summary
It is shown that the potential energy of a nucleon in the nucleus, evaluated in the first approximation of the perturbation method or on the basis of Brueckner’s theory, obeys a hyperbolic partial differential equation, which is independent of any nuclear parameter and is established by the antisymmetry properties of the nucleon assembly only. This nuclear equation rules the dependence of the potential both on the nucleon momentum and the nuclear density. The particular choice of the two-body forces or of the nucleon-nucleon phaseshifts for the evaluation of the potential energy of the nucleus, implies a specialization of the Cauchy problem, related to this equation, regardless of the saturation prescriptions of nuclear forces. It is shown that there exists a class of solutions of this nuclear equation which cannot be derived, in the first approximation of the perturbation method, from any of the known two-body potentials. This class of solutions, however, leads to the saturation of the nuclear binding energy and density as well as to the experimental value of the symmetry energy and to the correct behavior, in the low energy region, of the real and imaginary parts of the nuclear potential. A mathematical proof is given of the dependence of the potential inside the Fermi sphere on even powers of the nucleon momentum, as required by the invariance prescription of the potential with respect to time reflection. The linear dependence of the potential on the square of the nucleon momentum, and the so called nucleon effective mass approximation, is discussed in the light of the correspondence principle, which has been used to describe the motion of a nucleon in nuclear matter. Finally, it is shown that the Johnson-Teller, Schiff-Thirring and Drell-Huang theories of nuclear saturation implicitly involve only particular solutions of the considered nuclear equation.
Riassunto
Il problema della dipendenza dal momento dell’energia potenziale di un nucleone nell’interno del nucleo viene formulato da un nuovo, più generale, punto di vista.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L. Schiff:Quantum Mechanics (New York, 1949), p. 77.
K. A. Brueckner, C. A. Levinson andH. M. Mahmud:Phys. Rev.,95, 219 (1954).
K. A. Brueckner:Phys. Rev.,96, 508 (1954);B. S. DeWitt:Phys. Rev.,103, 1565 (1956);N. Fukuda andR. G. Newton:Phys. Rev.,103, 1558 (1956).
Note added in proof. — After the completion of this paper it appeared a paper byN. M. Hugenholtz andL. Van Hove (Physica,24, 363 (1958)), where this Theorem has been proved along different lines. The Hugenholtz and Van Hove Theorem will be discussed from our standpoint in a subsequent paper to be published inNucl. Phys. (C. Villi:On a Theorem on the single particle energy in a Fermi gas with interaction).
S. D. Drell andK. Huang:Phys. Rev.,91, 1527 (1953).
L. Eisenbud andE. P. Wigner:Proc. Nat. Ac.,27, 281 (1941).
E. Clementel andC. Villi:Nuovo Cimento,9, 950 (1958).
A. Kind andC. Villi:Nuovo Cimento,1, 749 (1955); see also,H. A. Bethe:Phys. Rev.,103, 1353 (1956).
P. Nemirowsky:Žu. Ėksper. Teor. Fiz.,30, 551 (1956);Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,101, 207 (1955).
M. A. Melkanoff, S. A. Moskowski, J. Nodvik andD. S. Saxon:Phys. Rev.,101, 507 (1956).
E. Clementel andC. Villi:Nuovo Cimento,2, 176 (1955); see also,M. Cini andS. Fubini:Nuovo Cimento,2, 75 (1955);A. M. Lane andC. F. Wandel:Phys. Rev.,99, 647 (1955);W. B. Riesenfeld andK. M. Watson:Phys. Rev.,102, 1157 (1956).
V. L. Fitch andJ. Rainwater:Phys. Rev.,92, 789 (1953);L. M. Cooper andE. M. Henley:Phys. Rev.,92, 801 (1953).
J. A. Wheeler:Rev. Mod. Phys.,21, 133 (1949);J. Tiomno andJ. A. Wheeler:Rev. Mod. Phys.,21, 153 (1949).
J. W. Keuffel, F. B. Harrison, T. K. K. Godfrey andG. T. Reynolds:Phys. Rev.,87, 942 (1949);A. J. Mayer andJ. W. Keuffel:Phys. Rev.,90, 349 (1953).
M. Wigdoff:Phys. Rev.,90, 891 (1953).
K. A. Brueckner, R. J. Francis andN. C. Eden:Phys. Rev.,100, 891 (1955); see alsoW. E. Frahn:Nuovo Cimento,4, 313 (1956).
M. H. Johnson andE. Teller:Phys. Rev.,98, 783 (1955).
L. J. Schiff:Phys. Rev.,84, 1 (1951);86, 856 (1952);92, 766 (1953);W. Thirring:Zeits. f. Naturfor.,7 a, 63 (1952);9, 804 (1954).
B. J. Malenka:Phys. Rev.,86, 68 (1952);P. Mittelstaedt:Zeits. f. Phys.,137, 545 (1954).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Note added in proof. — The author thanks Prof.L. Rosenfeld for illuminating discussions on the subject of this paper and for having communicated some results at theInternational Conference on Nuclear Physics (Paris, July 1958). Some important comments by Prof.V. F. Weisskopf are also gratefully acknowledged.
The author is pleased to express his sincere appreciation to Prof.P. Budini and to Prof.E. Clementel for stimulating discussions on various topics concerning this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Villi, C. On the momentum dependence of the nuclear potential. Nuovo Cim 10, 259–291 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02732483
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02732483