Skip to main content
Log in

Neurologic complications following carotid artery surgery: pathophysiology and predictive factors

Complicaciones neurologicas en cirugia carotidea

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

This study analyzes the results of 457 carotid artery operations done in 416 patients by the same surgeon during a five-year period. A total of 27 central neurologic complications were observed, 14 were transient and 13 were permanent neurologic deficits, nine of which resulted in death. The causes of these accidents were: embolism (12), intolerance to clamping (7), carotid thrombosis (3), and reperfusion injury (2). In three cases no cause could be found. Preoperative predictive factors for these complications were analyzed statistically by multivariate analysis techniques. A high-risk group was identified, characterized by diffuse atherosclerotic disease and by the presence of a previous neurologic deficit. The prevention of neurologic complications in carotid surgery goes far beyond the controversy of whether or not a temporary inlying shunt should be used. In our opinion indications for shunting are limited. Neurologic complications can be prevented by maintaining awareness of certain temporary contraindications in patients with permanent neurologic deficits and by exacting operative techniques.

Resumen

La gravedad de la cirugía carotídea viene determinada por las complicaciones neurológiicas centrales que se presentan en el curso de estas intervenciones. Se han valorado 457 reconstrucciones carotídeas realizadas en 416 pacientes, por un solo cirujano durante un período de 4 años. La chnica preoperatoria permite hacer 4 grupos: asintomáticos 14%, sintomatología no hemisférica y/o vértebro-basilar (IVB) 22%, ataque isquémico transitorio (AIT) 45% y con déficits neurológicos el 19%. En el 23% había una estenosis carotídea contralateral y en el 5% una obliteración. Entre los factores de riesgo destacan la HTA, cardiopatía y arteriopatía de miembros inferiores. En el postoperatorio inmediato, se han presentado 14 déficits neurológicos sin secuela (3 %) y 13 ictus, de los cuales 9 han fallecido (cuadro II). Las causas han sido: 12 embolias, 7 isquemias durante el clampaje, 3 oclusiones postoperatorias y 2 revascularizaciones cerebrales. En cuanto a la correlación entre la clínica y los hallazgos angiográficos preoperatorios, sólo es significativo la existencia previa de una IVB, HTA o una cardiopatia. Siendo estos factores junto con la oclusión carotídea contralateral, los que determinan un mayor riesgo en los enfermos a los que se van a someter a cirugía carotídea. La técnica quirúrgica no modifica el pronóstico, no siendo pues valorable la utilización o no de shunt o de plastia, tampoco parece importante la realización de intervenciones combinadas. Los autores a la luz de estos resultados, concluyen que la causa de complicación neurológica en cirugía carotídea más importante son las embolias y la obliteración postoperatoria provocando más de la mitad de las complicaciones (15/27). Las provocadas por el clampaje, sólo representan el 25 % del total no pareciendo que la aplicación del shunt pueda resolver estos problemas. La conclusión es que, bajo el punto de vista pronóstico el grado de extensión de la arteriopatía puede ser el principal factor para la producción de complicaciones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BENZECRI J.P. et al.—L'analyse des données (tome II: L'analyse des correspondances), Paris, Dunod, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  2. BENHAMOU A.C., KIEFFER E., NATALI J.—La chirurgie des sténoses de l'artère carotide interne est-elle raisonnable après 70 ans?Rev Prat, 1981,31, 2051–2059.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. EASTON J.D., SHERMAN D.G.—Stroke and mortality rate in carotid endartectomy.Stroke, 1977,8, 565–568.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. BRANCHEREAU A., BORDEAUX J., ODONDONG F.—Les résultats de la chirurgie de l'artère vertébrale au-delà de soixante-dix ans.Sem Hôp Paris, 1985,61, 1405–1408.

    Google Scholar 

  5. KIEFFER E., PETITJEAN C., BAHNINI A., RANCUREL G.—Chirurgie associée carotidienne et vertébrale.In: DEVIN R.—Chirurgie de l'Artère Vertébrale, Paris, Masson, 1984, 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  6. GRABER J.N., VOLLMAN R.W., JOHNSON W.C. et al.—Stroke after carotid endarterectomy: risk as predicted by preoperative computerized tomography.Am J Surg, 1984,147, 492–497.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. ROSENTHAL D., ZEICHNER W.D., LAMIS P.A., STANTON P.E.—Neurologic deficit after carotid endarterectomy: pathogenesis and management.surgery, 1983,94, 776–780.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. SUNDT T.M., SANDOK B.A., WHISNANT J.P.—Carotide endarterectomy: complications and pre-operative assessment of risk.Mayo Clin Proc, 1975,50, 301–306.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. BLAND J.E., CHAPMAN R.D., WYLIE E.J.—Neurological complications of carotid artery surgery.Ann Surg, 1970,171, 459–464.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. STEED D.L., PEITZMAN A.B., GRUNDY B.L., WEBSTER M.W.—Causes of stroke in carotid endarterectomy.Surgery, 1982,92, 634–641.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. TOWNE J.B., BERNHARD V.M.—Neurologic deficit following carotid endarterectomy.Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1982,154, 849–852.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. KENYON J.R.—Carotid endarterectomy: cerebral protection during arterial occlusion.In: GREENHALGH R.M., CLIFFORD ROSE F.C.—Progress in Stroke Research 2, London, Pitman, 1983, 399–404.

    Google Scholar 

  13. MOORE W.S., YEE J.M., HALL A.D.—Collateral cerebral blood pressure: an index of tolerance to temporary carotid occlusion.Arch Surg, 1973,106, 520–522.

    Google Scholar 

  14. IMPARATO A.M., RILES T.S., RAMIREZ A.A., LAMPARELLO P.J.—Early complications of carotid surgery.Int Surg, 1984,69, 223–229.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. GIORDANO J.M., TROUT H.H., KOZLOFF L., DE PALMA R.G.—Timing of carotid artery endarterectomy after stroke.J Vasc Surg, 1985,2, 250–254.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. COURBIER R., JAUSSERAN J.M., REGGI M. et al.—Routine intraoperative carotid angiography: its impact on operative morbidity and carotid restenosis.J Vasc Surg 1986,3, 343–350.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. JERNIGAN W.R., FULTON R.L., HAMMAN J.L. et al.—The efficacy of routine completion operative angiography in reducing the incidence of perioperative stroke associated with carotid endarterectomy.Surgery, 1984,96, 831–837.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. THOMPSON J.E.—Cerebral complications of carotid endarterectomy: correlation with methods of cerebral protection.In: BERNHARD V.M., TOWNE J.B.—Complications in Vascular Surgery, New York: Grune and Stratton, 1980, 223–234.

    Google Scholar 

  19. SMITH L.L., JACOBSON J.G., HINSHAW D.B.—Correlation of neurologic complications and pressure measurements during carotid endarterectomy.Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1976,143, 233–236.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. LITTOOY F.N., HALSTUK K.S., MANDANI et al.—Factors influencing morbitidity of carotid endarterectomy without a shunt.Am Surg, 1984,50, 350–353.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. CHARLEWORTH D., UNDERWOOD C.J.—The measurement of carotid artery back pressure: an unresolved problem.In: CREENHALGH R.M., CLIFFORD ROSE F.C.—Progress in Stroke Research 2, London, Pitman, 1983, 392–398.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Branchereau, A., Ondondong, F., Bordeaux, J. et al. Neurologic complications following carotid artery surgery: pathophysiology and predictive factors. Annals of Vascular Surgery 1, 79–85 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02732460

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02732460

Key-words

Navigation