Summary
It was found that the observedM1 transitions fromg 9/2 andd 5/2 analogue resonances in59Cu andg 9/2 analogue resonance in61Cu to their respective antianalogue state are at variance with theM1 strengths predicted by the single-particle shell model. An attempt has been made in this paper to explain the observed discrepancies between the predictedM1 strengths and measuredM1 strengths in terms of core-polarized states.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. D. Hossain:Nuovo Cimento A,39, 594 (1977).
R. E. Azuma, L. E. Carlson, A. M. Charlesworth, K. P. Jackson, N. Anyas-Weiss andB. Lalovie:Can. J. Phys.,44, 3075 (1966).
L. Simons, K. E. Nysten, M. Koskeling, O. Siltmen, E. Spring andG. Wendt:Phys. Lett.,3, 306 (1963).
K. J. Van Oostrum andA. C. Meijer:Nucl. Instrum. Methods,10, 31 (1961).
Y. P. Antoufiev, D. A. E. Darwish, D. E. Badawy, L. M. El-nadi andP. V. Sorokin:Nucl. Phys.,56, 401 (1964).
H. G. Price: D. Phil. Thesis, 1971, Oxford University, Oxford, England.
J. W. Butler andC. R. Gossett:Phys. Rev.,108, 1473 (1957).
M. D. Hossain: D. Phil. Thesis, 1972, Oxford University, Oxford, England.
I. Talmi andI. Unna:Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci.,10, 353 (1960).
I. Lindgren:α-β-γ Ray Spectroscopy, edited byK. S. Siegbahn, Vol.2 (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1968), p. 1921.
D. D. Watsen, J. C. Manthuruthil andF. D. Lee:Phys. Rev.,164, 1399 (1967).
S. Maripuu:Nucl. Phys. A,123, 357 (1969).
A. M. Lane:Nucl. Phys.,35, 676 (1963).
J. B. French: Argonne National Lab. Report, ANL-6878 (1964).
D. J. Pullen andB. Rosner:Phys. Rev.,170, 1034 (1968).
Data Sheet B., Vol.2, no. 5 (1968).
M. D. Hossain:J. Phys. G,1, 962 (1975).
M. D. Hossain:Nuovo Cimento A,60, 157 (1980).
J. R. Leslie, W. McLatchie, C. F. Monahan andJ. K. Thrasher:Nucl. Phys. A,170, 115 (1971).
S. Maripuu:Phys. Lett. B,31, 181 (1971).
A. Deshalit:Phys. Rev.,122, 1530 (1961).
R. D. Lawson andJ. L. Uressky:Phys. Rev.,108, 1300 (1957).
J. D. Anderson, C. Wong andJ. W. Mclure:Phys. Rev. B,138, 615 (1965).
J. A. Cookson:Phys. Lett. B,24, 570 (1967).
H. J. Young andJ. Rapport:Data Sheet B, Vol.2, no. 5 (1967).
I. Fodor, I. Szentpetery andJ. Szucs:Phys. Lett. B,32, 689 (1970).
I. Szentpetery andJ. Szucs:Phys. Rev. Lett.,28, 374 (1972).
R. Sherr, B. F. Bayman, E. Rost, M. R. Rickey andC. G. Hoot:Phys. Rev. B,139, 1272 (1965).
A. G. Blair andD. D. Armstrong:Phys. Lett.,16, 57 (1965).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author of this paper has agreed to not receive the proofs for correction.
The experiments were done at Harwell Laboratories and Nuclear Physics Laboratory, Oxford University, England.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hossain, M.D. Influence of core-polarized states in the inhibition of analogue-antianalogueM1 transitions in59,61Cu. Nuov Cim A 105, 1141–1148 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02730872
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02730872