Summary
Two independent components of the nondiffractive part of the structure functions are isolated, using the data from deep inelastic eN scattering and some preliminary results from neutrino experiments. This enables us i) to solve the problem of the apparent nonscaling of the Δ-resonance in the Bloom-Gilman sense and ii) to estimateD/F for the reggeon coupling to baryons in hadronic reactions.
Riassunto
Si sono isolati, usando i dati dello scattering anelastico profondo eN ed alcuni risultati preliminari degli esperimenti con neutrini, due componenti indipendenti della parte non diffrattiva delle funzioni di struttura. Questo ci permette i) di risolvere il problema dell’apparente mancanza di variazione di scala della risonanza Δ nel senso di Bloom e Gilman e ii) di valutareD/F per l’accoppiamento dei reggeoni ai barioni nelle reazioni adroniche.
Реэюме
Испольэуя данные иэ глубоко неупругого eN рассеяния и некоторые предварительные реэультаты иэ нейтринных зкспериментов, проводится выделение двух неэависимых компонент недифракционной части структурных функций. Предложенная процедура поэволяет нам: 1) раэрещить проблему явного отсутствия скейлинга для △-реэонанса в смысле Блума-Джилмана и, 2) оценить отнощениеD/F для свяэи реджеона с барионами в адронных реакциях.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
References
D. H. Perkins: lectures given at theFifth Hawaii Topical Conference in Particle Physics (August 1973);F. J. Sciulli:Total and differential cross-sections in deep inelastic neutrino scattering, Caltech. preprint, CALT-68-450.
J. D. Bjorken andE. A. Paschos:Phys. Rev.,185, 1975 (1969);J. Kuti andV. F. Weisskopf:Phys. Rev. D,4, 3418 (1971).
P. V. Landshoff andJ. C. Polkinghorne:Nucl. Phys.,28 B, 225 (1971).
M. Fritzsch andM. Gell-Mann:Proceedings of the Coral Gables Conferece on Fundamental Interactions at High Energy (1971).
M. Chaichian, A. Kitakado, S. Pallua, B. Renner andJ. de Azcárraga:Nucl. Phys.,51 B, 221 (1973).
M. Chaichian andS. Kitakado:Nucl. Phys.,59 B, 285 (1973);S. Kitakado: talk presented at theIX Bencontre de Moriond, 1974.
E. D. Bloom andF. J. Gilman:Phys. Rev. Lett.,25, 1140 (1970);Phys. Rev. D,4, 2901 (1971).
F. E. Close: Daresbury Lecture Note Series No. 12 (1973).
S. D. Drell andT. M. Yan:Phys. Rev. Lett.,24, 181 (1970);G. West:Phys. Rev. Lett.,24, 1206 (1970).
R. P. Feynman:Proceedings of the III High-Energy Conference at Stony Brook (New York, N. Y., 1970).
J. Mandula, J. Weyers andG. Zweig:Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci.,20, 289 (1970).
To be complete one has to consider more general duality solutions consisting of all 1, 8, 8, 10 representations and reducing to Eguchi’s one (Phys. Rev. D,10, 2652 (1974)) in theSU 6w limit. However it is known that the simplest solution used here is a very good approximation toSU 6w results in the limit ofD = 0 and we believe that the essential features ofSU 6w breaking in deep inelastic processes are nicely described by this simple solution.
J. L. Rosner:Phys. Rev. Lett.,24, 173 (1970).
J. S. Poucher, M. Breidenbach, R. Ditzler, J. I. Friedman andH. W. Kendall:Phys. Rev. Lett.,32, 118 (1974);A. Bodek: Ph. D. Thesis, MIT Report COO-3069-116 (1972);A. Bodek, D. L. Dubin, J. E. Elias, J. I. Friedman, H. W. Kendall, J. S. Poucher, E. M. Riordan, M. R. Sogard, D. H. Coward andD. J. Sherdan: SLAC preprint SLAC-PUB-1399 (1974).
F. E. Close, F. J. Gilman andI. Karliner:Phys. Rev. D,6, 2533 (1972);F. E. Close andF. J. Gilman:Phys. Rev. D,7, 2258 (1973);F. E. Close:Phys. Lett.,43 B, 422 (1973).
Values for the height of the resonance bumps are taken fromM. Breidenbach: Ph. D. Thesis, MIT, LNS-MIT 2098-635 (1970), unpublished;M. Köbberling, J. Moritz, K. H. Schmidt, D. Wegener, D. Zeller, J. Bleckwenn andF. H. Heimlich:Nucl. Phys.,82 B, 201 (1974).
S. Pallua andB. Renner:Phys. Lett.,38 B, 105 (1972).
Determination of the form factor powers is not unambiguous, because it is affected, at presentq 2, by the choice of the scaling mass. If we takeμ 2 ⋍ 0.71 (GeV)2 (we parametrize the form factors by (1 −q 2/μ 2)−n) as for the nucleon and use the fit ofR. C. E. Davenish andD. H. Lyth (Phys. Rev. D,5, 47 (1972)) to determine the power, we get approximatelyn A ⋍ 2.2. If on the other handμ 2 ⋍ (1.236)2 (scaling form factor idea), thenn A ⋍ 3 (F. Close). We thankF. Close for informative correspondence on this point.
J. D. Bjorken:Phys. Rev.,148, 1467 (1966).
F. E. Close: CERN preprint Ref. TH. 1875-CERN (1974).
The normalization is such that\(\int N _1 (x)dx = \int A _1 (x)dx = \frac{3}{2}\). So the total number of valence quarks within the nucleon is 3 (see eq. (3)).
The result strongly depends on how much of the diffraction we have to subtract in the region of smallx. We used the preliminary neutrino data, which include big errors. Considering the extreme casesD/F can be constrained at least by the following bounds: −0.6 ⩽D/F ⩽ 0. We can also evaluatedD/F using various fits proposed for the structure functions. For example,V. Barger andR. J. N. Philipps (University of Wisconsin, COO-881-390 (1973)) giveD/F ⋍ − 0.07.R. Mc-Elhaney andS. F. Tuan (Phys. Rev. D,8, 2267 (1973)) giveD/F = −0.24.
C. Michael:Springer Tracts in Modern Physics,55, 173 (1970).
D. J. Fox, C. Chang, K. W. Chen, A. Kotlewski, P. F. Kunz, L. N. Hand, S. Herb, S. C. Loken, A. Rusell, Y. Watanabe, W. Vernon andM. Stovink: CLNS-278, MSU-16 (1974).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
To speed up publication, the authors of this paper have agreed to not receive the proofs for correction.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Flume-Gorczyca, B., Kitakado, S. The components ofνW 2 andSU 6w breaking in deep inelastic scattering. Nuov Cim A 28, 321–336 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729823
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729823