Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring price thresholds using social judgment theory

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Price perceptions of 120 homemakers were assessed for one product using social judgment theory. In keeping with the theory, the homemakers' latitudes of acceptance, rejection, and noncommitment were established in a laboratory experiment. Product involvement and price sensitivity were manipulated, and their impact on the respective latitudes was measured. Implications for price strategy based on the analysis are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, D. 1970. “Consumer Reaction to Price.” in B. Taylor and G. Wills (eds.)Pricing Strategy. London: Brandon/Systems Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. 1973. “Theories of Attitude Structure and Change.” in S. Ward and T. Robertson (eds.),Consumer Behavior, Theoretical Sources. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. E. 1972.Microeconomic. Homewood, IL: Irwin, Third Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouilhe, P. 1970. “The Subject Evaluation of Price: Methodological Aspects.” in B. Taylor and G. Wills (eds.)Pricing Strategy. London: Brandon/Systems Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, Jonathan L. 1969. “Role Playing: Psychology by Consensus.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 13 (February) 107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabor, D. and Granger, C. 1970. “The Attitude of the Consumer to Price.” in B. Taylor and G. Wills (eds.)Pricing Strategy. London: Brandon/Systems Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, F. 1972.Consumer Choice Behavior: A Cognitive Theory. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, H. E. 1966. “The Measurement of Advertising Involvement.”Public Opinion Quarterly 30 (Fall) 583–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, K. 1971. “Psychophysics of Price: A Reappraisal.”Journal of Marketing Research 8 (November) 248–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1973. “Buyer's Subjective Perceptions of Price.”Journal of Marketing Research 10 (February) 70–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pessemier, E. 1959. “A New Way to Determine Buying Decisions.”Journal of Marketing 24 (February) 41–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1960. “An Experimental Method for Estimating Demand.”Journal of Business 33, 373–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Burger, P., Teach R. and Tigert, D. 1971. “Using Laboratory Brand Preference Scales to Predict Consumer Brand Choices.”Management Science 17, B351-B385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, T. S. 1976. “Low-Commitment Consumer Behavior.”Journal of Advertising Research 116 (April)19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M. L. 1977. Advertising Strategies for High and Low Involvement Situations. Working paper, Graduate School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

  • Sawyer, Allen. 1977. “The Role Playing in Experiments about Consumer Behavior.” in Barnett Greenburg and Danny Bellenger (eds.)Contemporary Marketing Thought. 1Chicago: American Marketing Association 191–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1975. “Demand Artifacts in Laboratory Experiments in Consumer Research.”The Journal of Consumer Research 1 (March) 20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, C. 1963. “Social Categorization as a Function of Latitude of Acceptance and Series Range.”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 48 (February) 148–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. and Hovland, C. 1961.Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Sherif, C. and Nebergall, R. 1965.Attitude and Attitude Change. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoetzel, Jean. 1970. “Psychological Sociological Aspects of Price” in B. Taylor and G. Wills (eds.)Pricing Strategy. London: Brandon/Systems Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. and Wills, G. (eds.). 1970.Pricing Strategy. London: Brandon/Systems Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willenborg, J. and Pitts, R. 1977. “Perceived Situational Effects on Price Sensitivity.”Journal of Business Research 5, 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cummings, W.T., Ostrom, L.L. Measuring price thresholds using social judgment theory. JAMS 10, 395–409 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729343

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729343

Keywords

Navigation