Skip to main content
Log in

Convenience-package banning: Economic and environmental implications

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Civic Improvement Bulletin. Number 10 (Boca Raton, Florida, 1972).

  2. New York Times (October 12, 1972), p. 2.

  3. Softdrinks, (Great Neck, New York, March 1973).

  4. Ibid. Softdrinks, (Great Neck, New York, March 1973).

  5. Ibid. Softdrinks, (Great Neck, New York, March 1973).

  6. New York Times (February 13, 1973), p. 20.

  7. Ibid. New York Times (February 13, 1973), p. 20.

  8. Midwest Research Institute. The National Economic Impact of a Ban on Non-Refillable Beverage Containers (Kansas City, Missouri, 1971).

  9. Ibid. Midwest Research Institute. The National Economic Impact of a Ban on Non-Refillable Beverage Containers (Kansas City, Missouri, 1971).

  10. Robert S. Weinberg. The Effect of Convenience Packaging on the Malt Beverage Industry 1947–1969 (St. Louis, Missouri, 1971).

  11. Midwest Research Institute.

  12. Civic Improvement Bulletin. Special Report (Boca Raton, Florida, 1973).

  13. Civic Improvement Bulletin. Number 10 (Boca Raton, Florida 1972).

  14. Ibid. Civic Improvement Bulletin. Number 10 (Boca Raton, Florida 1972).

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilson, C.C. Convenience-package banning: Economic and environmental implications. JAMS 1, 75–79 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729318

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729318

Keywords

Navigation