Skip to main content
Log in

Classical error pairs and the Bayesian prior

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We have attempted to show the way in which Bayesian and classical approaches are both similar and divergent. The vehicle for discussion, primarily, involved considerations of cost consequences, planning horizons and numbers of alternatives. In turn, these variables were related to the statistical problem continuum, with classical and Bayesian approaches at opposite ends of the scale. By relating problem variables to this continuum, the question of which approach is most appropriate in a particular situation can be more readily resolved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hirschleifer, J., “The Bayesian Approach to Statistical Decision: An Exposition.”Journal of Busines, Vol. 34 No. 4 (October, 1961), pp. 471–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Raiffa, H. and Schlaifer, R.,Applied Statistical Decision Theory (Boston, Massachusets: Harvard University Press, 1961); especially pp. vii-xx.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Overall, John E., “Classical Statistical Hypothesis Testing within the Context of Bayesian Theory.”Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 71, No. 4 (1969), pp. 285–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cornfield, J., “The Bayesian Outlook and its Application.”Biometrics, Vol. 25, No. 4 (December, 1969), pp. 617–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hays, W. L. and Winkler, R. L.,Statistics, Probability, Inference and Decision (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston Inc., 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sasaki, K.,Statistics for Modern Business Decision Making (Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wonnacott, T. H. and Wonnacott, R. J.,Introductory Statistics (New York: Wiley, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Birnbaum, A., “On the Foundations of Statistical Inference.”American Statistical Assocaition Journal, Vol. 57, No. 298 (June, 1962), pp. 269–306, with discussion on pp. 269–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lehmann, E. L. “Significance Level and Power.”Annals of Mathematical, Statistics, Vol. 29 (1958), pp. 1167–1176.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Novick, M. R. and Grizzle, J. E. “A Bayesian Approach to the Analysis of Data from Clinical Trials.”American Statistical Association Journal, Vol. 60, No. 304 (March, 1965), pp. 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Myers, B. L. and Melcher, A. J. “On the Choice of Risk Levels in Managerial Decision Making.”Management Science, Vol. 16, Part 1, No. 2 (October, 1969), pp. B31-B39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Myers, B.L., Enrick, N. Classical error pairs and the Bayesian prior. JAMS 1, 43–51 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729314

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729314

Keywords

Navigation