Skip to main content
Log in

Risky shift: An empirical investigation and implications for industrial buying behavior and marketing management

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study attempts to determine whether the nature of the industrial buying process has an effect on the riskiness of its decisions. Research has shown that group discussion of alternatives has a tendency to shift initial risk preferences of individuals and groups. This social phenomenon, known as “risky shift,” has important implications for marketers since many decisions involve group consensus or social influence if decisions are made by a single individual. It was posited that the influence of others, mainfested by group discussion, will change the risk preference in both individual and group consensus decisions. An industrial supplier selection decision was presented to 92 marketing students in which five alternative sources of supply were described in reference to various performance criteria. The data clearly reflected statistically significant changes in risk preferences as a result of group discussion in both the individual before-individual after and individual before-group after type decision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bateson, Nicholas. 1966. “Familiarization, Group Discussion, and Risk Taking.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2 (April) 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Paul R. and Jamieson, Bruce D. 1970. “Publicity of Initial Decisions and the Risky Shift Phenomenon.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 6 (July) 329–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, Daryl J., Wallach, Michael A. and Kogan, Nathan. 1965. “Group Decision-Making Under Risk of Aversive Consequences.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1 (April) 453–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. 1965. Social Psychology. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, B. D. 1968. “The Risky Shift Phenomenon With a Heterogeneous Sample.” Psychological Reports 23 (August) 203–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, Nathan and Doise, Willem. 1969. “Effects of Anticipated Delegate Status On Level of Risk Taking in Small Decision-Making Groups.” Acta Psychologica 29 (May) 228–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, Helmut and Kogan, Nathan. 1970. “Risk Taking in the Context of Intergroup Negotiation.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 6 (July) 351–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, D. G. 1962. “Individual Responsibility and Group Decisions Involving Risk.” Industrial Management Review 3 (Fall) 8–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhoy, F. 1962. “Group Interaction in Decision-Making Under Risk.” Unpublished Master's Thesis, School of Industrial Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Pruitt, D. G. and Teger, A. I. 1967. “Is There a Shift Toward Risk in Group Discussion? If So, Is It a Group Phenomenon? If So, What Causes It?” Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Conference, Washington, D.C.

  • Rabow, Jerome, Fowler, Floyd J., Bradford, David L., Hofeller, Margaret A. and Shibuya, Yuriko. 1966. “The Role of Social Norms and Leadership in Risk-Taking.” Sociometry 29 (March) 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rim, Y. 1963. “Risk Taking and Need for Achievement.” Acta Psychologica 21 (March) 108–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Bruce L., Winn, Paul R. and Savage, Randall C. 1974. “The Shift to Risk in Decision-Making: A Value-Release Explanation.” Working Paper, Illinois State University.

  • Stoner, James A. F. 1961. “A Comparison of Individual and Group Decisions Involving Risk.” Unpublished Master's Thesis, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Stoner, James A. F. 1968. “Risky and Cautious Shifts in Group Decisions: The Influence of Widely Held Values.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 4 (October) 442–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidmar, Neil. 1970. “Group Composition and the Risky Shift.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 6 (April) 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, Michael A. and Kogan, Nathan. 1959. “Sex Differences and Judgment Processes.” Journal of Personality 27 (December) 555–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, Michael A. and Kogan, Nathan. 1961. “Aspects of Judgment and Decision-Making: Interrelationships and Changes with Age.” Behavioral Science 6 (January) 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, Michael A., Kogan, Nathan and Bem, Daryl J. 1962. “Group Influence on Individual Risk Taking.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 65 (August) 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, Michael A., Kogan, Nathan and Bem, Daryl J. 1964. “Diffusion of Responsibility and Level of Risk-Taking in Groups.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 68 (March) 263–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodside, Arch G. 1974. “Is There a Generalized Risky Shift Phenomenon in Consumer Behavior?” Journal of Marketing Research 11 (May) 225–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stern, B.L., Gazda, G.M. Risky shift: An empirical investigation and implications for industrial buying behavior and marketing management. JAMS 3, 287–295 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729289

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729289

Keywords

Navigation