Abstract
The central Indian state of Madhya Pradesh is home to a large number of tribal populations of diverse linguistic and ethnic backgrounds. With a view to examining how well genomic affinities among tribal populations of this state correspond with their ethnic and linguistic affinities, we analysed DNA samples of individuals drawn from five tribes with diverse, but reasonably well-documented, ethnohistorical and linguistic backgrounds. Each DNA sample was scored at 16 biallelic DNA marker loci. On the basis of these data, genomic affinities among these populations were estimated. We have found an extremely good correspondence between the genomic and ethnolinguistic affinities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson T. I., Heimdal K. R., Skrede M., Tveit K., Berg K. and Borresen A. L. 1994 Oestrogen receptor (ESR) polymorphism in breast cancer susceptibility.Hum. Genet. 94, 665–670.
Cascorbi I., Brockmoller J., Mrozikiewicz P. M., Baner S., Loddenkemper R. and Roots I. 1996 Homozygous rapid arylamine N-acetyltransferase (NAT2) genotype as a susceptibility factor for lung cancer.Cancer Res. 56, 3961–3966.
Edwards M. C. and Gibbs R. A. 1992 A human dimorphism resulting from loss of anAlu.Genomics 14, 590–597.
Elwin V. 1947The Muria and their Ghotul. Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
Fuchs S. 1968The Gond and Bhumia of eastern Mandla. New Literature Publishing House, Bombay.
Hayashi S., Watanabe K., Nakachi K. and Kawajiri K. 1991 Genetic linkage of lung cancer-associatedMspI polymorphism with amino acid replacement in the heme binding region of the human cytochrome P450IAI gene.J. Biochem. 110, 407–411.
Majumder P. P. 1998 People of India: Biological diversity and affinities.Evol. Anthropol. 6, 100–110.
Miller S. A., Dykes D. D. and Polysky H. F. 1988 A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells.Nucl. Acids Res. 16, 1215.
Nei M. 1973 Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70, 3321–3323.
Nei M., Tajima. F. and Tateno Y. 1983 Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data II. Gene frequency data.J. Mol. Evol. 19, 153–170.
Parpola A. 1975 On the protohistory of the Indian languages in the light of archeological, linguistic and religious evidence: an attempt at integration. InSouth Asian archeology (ed. J. E. Van Lohuizen-De Leeuw), pp. 73–84. Brill Academic, New York.
Russel R. V. and Hiralal R. B. 1916Castes and tribes of Central Provinces of India. Macmillan, London.
Saitou N. and Nei M. 1987 The neighbour-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406–425.
Shukla H. L. 1985Language, ethnicity and history. B. R. Publishing, Delhi.
Singh K. S. 1992People of India, vol. 1. Oxford University Press, Delhi.
Stepanov P. and Lemza S. V. 1993 PvuII restriction FLP of lipoprotein lipase in Russians.Hum. Hered. 43, 388–390.
Stinissen P. and Broeckhoven C. V. 1991 PCR detection of the frequent TaqI RFLP at the locus D21S13E.Nucl. Acids Res. 19, 2516.
Stoneking M., Fontius J. J., Clifford S. L., Soodyall H., Arcott S. S., Saha N.et al. 1997Alu insertion polymorphisms and human evolution: Evidence for a large population size in Africa.Genome Res. 7, 1061–1071.
Tishkoff, S. A., Ruano G., Kidd J. R. and Kidd K. K. 1996 Distribution and frequency of a polymorphicAlu insertion at the plasminogen activator locus in humans.Hum. Genet. 97, 759–764.
Venkatachar C. S. 1935 Notes on migration of castes and tribes into central India and their distribution. InCensus of India, 1931 (ed. J. H. Hutton), pp. 60–64. Government of India Press, New Delhi.
Zischler H., Geisert H., von Haeseler A. and Paabo S. 1995 A nuclear ‘fossil’ of the mitochondrial D-loop and the origin of modern fossils.Nature 378, 489–492.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mukherjee, N., Mitra, M., Chakraborty, M. et al. Congruence of genomic and ethnolinguistic affinities among five tribal populations of Madhya Pradesh (India). J Genet 79, 41–46 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02728944
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02728944