Summary
Assuming the algebra of currents, PCAC for pions, and some other technical conditions, we prove that any Hamiltonian densityH(x), whoseSU 3-breaking component belongs to the (3, 3*)⊕(3*, 3) representation of theSW 3-group, must automatically have the following structure:H(x)=H 0(x)+H 1(x)+H 2(x).H 0(x) is invariant underSW 3,H 1(x) breaksSU 3 but is invariant underSW 2, whileH 2(x) is invariant underSU 3 but violatesSW 2. Also,H 2(x) will vanish in the soft-pion limit. This model contains, as special cases, the schemes of Gell-Mann, Oakes and Renner, and of Glashow and Weinberg.
Riassunto
Adottando l’algebra delle correnti, la PCAC per i pioni, ed alcune altre condizioni tecniche, si dimostra che ogni densità hamiltonianaH(x), le cui componenti che infrangono la simmetria appartengono alla rappresentazione (3, 3*)⊕(3*, 3) del gruppoSW 3, deve automaticamente avere la seguente struttura:H(x)−H 0(x)+H 1(x)+H 2(x).H 0(x) è invariante rispetto aSW 3,H 1(x) infrangeSU 3 ma è invariante rispetto aSW 2, mentreH 2(x) è invariante rispetto aSU 3 ma violaSW 2. InoltreH 2(x) tende a zero nel limite del pione molle. Questo modello contiene come casi speciali gli schemi di Gell-Mann, Oakes e Rennes, e di Glashow e Weinberg.
Реэюме
Предполагая алгебру токов, РСАС для пионов и некоторые другие технические условия, докаэывается, что любая плотность ГамильтонианаH (x) чья компонента, нарущаюшаяSU 3, принадлежит (3, 3*)⊕(3*, 3) представлению группыSW 3, должна автоматически иметь следуюшую структуру:H(x)=H 0(x)++H 1(x)+H 2(x).H 0(x) является инвариантным относительноSW 3,H 1(x) нарущаетSU 3, но является инвариантным относительноSW 2, тогда какH 2(x) инвариантно относительноSU 3, но нарущаетSW 2. Кроме того,H 2(x) обрашается в нуль в пределе мягких пионов. Эта модель содержит, как честные случаи, схемы Гелл-Мана, Оакса и Реннера, и Глащоу и Вейнберга.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Gell-Mann, R. J. Oakes andB. Renner:Phys. Rev.,175, 2195 (1968).
S. L. Glashow andS. Weinberg:Phys. Rev. Lett.,20, 224 (1968).
S. Okubo andV. S. Mathur:Phys. Rev. D,1, 2046 (1970);V. S. Mathur andS. Okubo:Phys. Rev. D,1, 3468 (1970).
F. von Hippel andJ. Kim:Phys. Rev. D,1, 151 (1970).
H. Kleinert, F. Steiner andP. Weisz:Phys. Lett.,34 B, 312 (1971).
T. P. Cheng andR. Dashen:Phys. Rev. Lett.,26, 549 (1971).
G. Höhler, H. P. Jakob andR. Strauss:Phys. Lett.,35 B, 445 (1971);M. Ericson andM. Rho:Phys. Lett.,36 B, 93 (1971).
R. A. Brandt andG. Preparata:Ann. of Phys.,61, 119 (1970);Lett. Nuovo Cimento,4, 80 (1970).
M. Gell-Mann:Lectures at the University of Hawaii Summer School (1969), unpublished.
G. Altarelli, N. Cabibbo andL. Maiani:Phys. Lett.,35 B, 415 (1971);R. J. Crewther:Phys. Rev. D,3, 3152 (1971);J. Ellis: to be published in theProceedings of the 1971 Coral Gables Conference on Fundamental Interactions at High Energy.
E.g.,S. Weinberg: inProceedings of the 1968 High-Energy Conference at Vienna, edited byJ. Prentki andJ. Steinberger (Geneva, 1968).
R. Olshansky andK. Kang:Phys. Rev. D,3, 2094 (1971);V. S. Mathur andT. C. Yang: to be published.
R. Arnowitt, M. A. Friedman andP. Nath:Phys. Rev. Lett.,26, 104 (1971);F. C. P. Chan:Phys. Rev. D,4, 189 (1971);K. Schilcher:Phys. Rev. D,4, 237 (1971). These authors include the (1, 8)⊕(8, 1)SW 3-breaking interaction in addition to the (3, 3*)⊕(3*, 3) type, in order to explain the Kt3 decay parameters.
S. Okubo:Phys. Rev., to appear;S. Okubo andI. F. Shith:Phys. Rev., to be published;I. F. Shih andS. Okubo: to be published.
R. Dashen:Phys. Rev. D,3, 1879 (1971).
Riazuddin andS. Oneda:Phys. Rev. Lett.,27, 548 (1971).
J. Schechter andY. Ueda:Phys. Rev. D,3, 2874 (1971);H. Osborne andD. J. Wallace:Nucl. Phys.,20 B, 23 (1970);V. S. Mathur, S. Okubo andJ. Subba Rao:Phys. Rev. D,1, 2058 (1970).
K. J. Barnes andC. J. Isham:Nucl. Phys.,17 B, 267 (1970);A. M. H. RashidnadM. A. Rashid:Phys. Rev. D,3, 581 (1971).
This has been proved under some conditions byD. J. Gross andR. Jackiw:Phys. Rev.,163, 1688 (1967). See also,D. N. Levin:Phys. Rev. D,3, 1320 (1971), who reaches a similar conclusion for the electromagnetic current. However, it is possible that this assumption may not hold in some models. (SeeD. Boulware andR. Jackiw:Phys. Rev.,186, 1442 (1969).)
S. Okubo:Phys. Rev. D,3, 409 (1971).
Of course, the PCAC may be regarded as a definition of the pion field in view of Haag-Nishijima-Zimmerman theorem. See, for example,S. Okubo andR. E. Marshak:Phys. Rev.,123, 382 (1961).
There is a sign misprint in eq. (1.6) of ref. (20). The correct equation is eq. (2.3) of the present paper, which changes the sign of the second term on the right-hand side.
D. J. Gross andR. Jackiw:Phys. Rev.,163, 1688 (1967);T. K. Kuo andM. Sugawara:Phys. Rev.,163, 1716 (1967).
L. Gomberoff: preprint.
S. Coleman:Phys. Lett.,19, 144 (1965).
R. Dashen andH. Weinstein:Phys. Rev. Lett.,22, 1337 (1969).
C. J. Isham, A. Salam andJ. Strathdee:Phys. Rev. D,2, 685 (1970).
J. Ellis: to be published in theProceedings of the 1971 Coral Gables Conference on Fundamental Interactions at High Energy;J. Ellis, P. H. Weisz andB. Zumino:Phys. Lett.,34 B, 91 (1971).
H. Kleinert andP. H. Weisz:Lett. Nuovo Cimento,4, 1091 (1970);Nucl. Phys.,27 B, 23 (1971).
R. Jackiw:Phys. Rev. D,3, 1347 (1356, (1971);K. Raman:Phys. Rev. Lett.,26, 1069 (1971).
D. N. Levin andD. R. Palmer: to be published.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
To speed up publication, the author of this paper has agreed to not receive the proofs for correction.
Work supported in part by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Okubo, S. A generalization of chiralSW 3 model. Nuov Cim A 7, 765–778 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02728809
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02728809