Summary
A proposed «crucial experiment» to test Einstein's special theory of relativity is analysed and it is shown that it falls into the set of unsatisfactory proposals that attempt to make an experimental distinction between Einstein's special theory of relativity and a «Lorentzian type» special theory of relativity.
Riassunto
Si analizza un proposto «esperimento cruciale» per provare la teoria della relatività ristretta di Einstein e si mostra che cade nell'insieme di proposte insoddisfacenti che tentano di fare una distinzione sperimentale fra la teoria della relatività ristretta di Einstein e una teoria della relatività ristretta di tipo lorentziano.
Резюме
Анализируется предложенный «критический эксперимент» для проверки специальной теории относительности Эйнштейна. Показывается, что этот эксперимент распадается на систему неудовлетворительных предложений, чтобы обнаружить экспериментальное различие между специальной теорией относительности Эйнштейна и специальной теорией относительности «лорентцевского типа».
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. Erlichson:Amer. Journ. Phys.,41, 1068 (1973). This paper gives a critical review and a comparison between a Lorentzian-type theory and Einstein's theory of special relativity. There it is stated that to date no theoretical proof exists which shows the impossibility of making an experimental distinction between the two types theories. A Lorentzian-type theory is every theory which assumes a preferred or absolute frame, real-time dilations and real-length contractions as a function of velocity with respect to this frame.
A. N. Dos Santos:Nuovo Cimento,32 B, 519 (1976).
By absolute speed we mean speed with respect to the ether (preferred) frame. No assumptions on its nature are relevant. The velocity of the Earth is supposed to be small with respect to the absolute frame.
This statement should be justified since, if one accepts the bing-bang theory and some of its consequences concerning an isotropic distribution of microwave radiation, then one may be able to use every anisotropy in this radiation to measure its absolute velocity (i.e., the velocity with respect to a frame fixed at the big-bang event). SeeE. K. Conklin:Nature,222, 972 (1969), and several articles byH. C. Dudley.
V. Buonamano andJ. E. Moore:Amer. Journ. Phys.,42, 1021 (1974).
V. Buonamano:Int. Journ. Theor. Phys.,13, 213 (1975).
C.9W. Misner, K. S. Thorne andJ. A. Wheeler:Gravitation (San Francisco, Cal., 173), p. 63.
L. Janossy:Theory of Relativity Based on Physical Reality (Budapest, 1971).
D. I. Blokhintsev:Phys. Lett.,12, 272 (1964).
T. Tati:Prog. Theor. Phys.,37, 754 (1967).
P. A. M. Dirac:Proc. Roy. Soc.,165 A, 199 (1938).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Traduzione a cura della Redazione
Переведено редакцией.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rodrigues, W.A., Buonamano, V. A comment on a proposed «crucial experiment» to test Einstein's special theory of relativity. Nuov Cim B 34, 240–244 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02728604
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02728604