References
Y. Hama:Phys. Rev. D,6, 3306 (1972).
R. Stroynowski: ABBCCHLVW Collaboration:IV International Confererence on High-Energy Collisions at Oxford, April 1972, CERN/D.Ph.II-Phys. 72-22.
R. C. Hwa:Phys. Rev. Lett.,26, 1143 (1971);R. C. Hwa andC. S. Lam:Phys. Rev. Lett.,27, 1098 (1971).
M. Jacob andR. Slansky:Phys. Lett.,37 B, 408 (1971);Phys. Rev. D,5, 1847 (1972).
P. Slattery: University of Rochester preprint UR-409, Sept. 1972, to be published. Actually we took these data from a table given byS. Barshay:Phys. Lett.,42 B, 457 (1972).
P. Pirilä andS. Pokorski: CERN preprint TH. 1607-CERN.
L. Van Hove: CERN preprint TH. 1581-CERN;K. Fiaŀkowski:Phys. Lett.,41 B, 379 (1972).
Throughout the present note, the double dissociation is neglected. The inclusion of this will not change the main results in any considerable amount.
We think that, essentially, the same results may be obtained in a more general framework which includes some dynamics, provided that a large number of particles is produced.
F. Lurçat andP. Mazur:Nuovo Cimento,31, 140 (1964).
If one calculates\(\bar n(M)\) in the same way as described here, but assuming that all the particles are distinguishable, one will find\(\bar n(M) \sim M\). The actual case is somewhat intermediary between these two limits. So, within the framework of the statistical model, we expect\(\bar n(M) \sim M^a \) with 2/3<α<1.
These data are taken from Table I of a paper byS. N. Ganguli andP. K. Malhotra:Phys. Lett.,42 B, 83 (1972).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abud, M., Hama, Y. Missing-cluster analysis of multiple production. Lett. Nuovo Cimento 7, 659–664 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02728047
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02728047