Skip to main content
Log in

Approaches to sample size calculation in comparative studies

  • Special Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The questions ‘what should be the minimum study subjects’ and ‘how these subjects should be enrolled in the study’ are two aspects that are considered at the design stage. Regardless of research question and the study design adopted, these two questions are an integral part of any research proposal. No matter how well a study is conducted and statistically analysed using sophisticated statistical methods/softwares, if the study size is inadequate, concluding statements will have inadequate power and such statements may be misleading and harmful to both target population and the scientific community. There is no substitute/shortcut to an adequate study size as no statistical methods are available to adjust for an inadequate study size. Though a larger sample size will result in higher precision in estimates, however, it may not be desirable in terms of cost, time and the efforts. In medical sciences, majority of research questions pertain to comparing outcome measures in two or more than two groups. Focus of this article is on the number of study subjects required in a study and an attempt is made to review the ingredients required to calculate the sample size in situations commonly encountered by researchers in medical sciences. Formulae for the specific situations are provided with worked out examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frieman JA, Chalmers TC, Smith H, Kubler RR. The importance of beta, the type II error and sample size in design and interpretation of the randomized controlled trial: survey of “negative” trials.N Eng J Med 1978; 299 : 690–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Altman DG.Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman and Hall, India. 1991: 514–517.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lemshow SL, Hosmer DW, Klar JN, Lwanga KS.Adequacy of Sample Size in Health Studies. John Wiley & Sons New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fleiss JL.Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. John Wiley & Sons, New York 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zar JH.Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Machin D, Campbell MJ.Statistical Tables for the Design of Clinical Trials. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lee ET.Statistical Methods for survival data analysis, Lifetime Learning, California, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pandey, R.M. Approaches to sample size calculation in comparative studies. Indian J Pediatr 66, 533–538 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02727163

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02727163

Key words

Navigation