Skip to main content
Log in

The incidence of unethical practices in marketing research: An empricial investigation

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authros examine from the perspective of marketing professionals the incidence of unethical research practices and the influence of organizational factors as determinants of the incidence of unethical research practices. The results indicate some degree of indicence of unethical research practices, particularly of those involving respondents. In addition, the results suggest four organizational variables— extent of ethical problems within the organization, top management actions on ethics, organizational role, and industry category—as determinants of the incidence of unethical research partices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achenbaum, Alvin, A. 1985. “Can We Tolerate a Double Standard in Marketing Research?”Journal of Advertising Research 25 (June/July): RC3-RC7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akaah, Ishmael P. and Edward A. Riordan. 1989. “Judgments of Marketing Professionals About Ethical Issues in Marketing Research: A Replication and Extension.”Journal of Marketing Research 26 (February): 112–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, Scott J. and Terry S. Overton. 1977. “Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys.”Journal of Marketing Research 14 (August): 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, Robert. 1967. “A Model for Ethics in Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 21 (January): 20–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumhart, Raymond C. 1961. “How Ethical are Businessment?”Harvard Business Review 39 (July–August): 6–19, 156–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezilla, Robert, Joel B. Haynes, and Clifford Elliot. 1976. “Ethics in Marketing Research.”Business Horizons 19 (April): 83–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blankenship, A.B. 1964. “Some Aspects of Ethics in Marketing Research.”Journal of Marketing Research 1 (May): 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, Steven N. and Earl A. Molander. 1977. “Is the Ethics of Business Changing?”Harvard Business Review 55 (January–February): 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, Ted L. and Barbara Coe. 1976. “Marketing Research: The Search for Professionalism.” InMarketing: 1776–1976 and Beyond, Kenneth L. Bernhardt, ed. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, pp. 257–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coney, Kenneth A. and John H. Murphy. 1976. “Attitudes of Marketers Toward Ethical and Professional Marketing Research Practices.” In:Proceedings: Southern Marketing Association, Henry W. Nash and Donald P. Robin, eds., pp. 172–174.

  • Crawford, Merle C. 1970. “Attitudes of Marketing Executives Toward Ethics in Marketing Research.”Journal of Marketing 34 (April): 46–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethics Resource Center. 1979.Codes of Ethics in Corporations and Trade Associations and the Teaching of Ethics in Graduate Business Schools. Princeton, NJ: Opion, Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O.C. and Larry G. Gresham. 1985. “A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision-Making in Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 49 (Summer): 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O.C. and Steven J. Skimer. 1988. “Ethical Behavior and Bureaucratic Structure in Marketing Research Organizations.”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (February): 103–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, Fred L. and Robert J. Hock. 1976. “Who Claims Corporate Responsibility? The Biggest and the Worst.”Business and Society Review 18 (Summer): 62–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, George, Jr. 1987. “Marketing Execs Split on Question of Regulations.”Marketing News 21 (January) 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, Hubert and Thomas S. Robertson. 1989. “Technology Diffusion: An Empirical Test of Comparative Effects.”Journal of Marketing 53 (January): 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Shelby D. and Scott Vitell 1986. “A General Theory of Marketing Ethics.”Journal of Macromarketing (Spring) 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Shelby D., Lawrence B. Chonko, and James B. Wilcox. 1984. “Ethical Problems of Marketing Researchers.”Journal of Marketing Research 21 (August): 309–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laczniak, Gene R. 1983. “Business Ethics: A Manager’s Primer.”Business 33 (January–March): 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, Stephen W., Perry Verille, and Charles S. Madden. 1985. “The Threats to Marketing Research: An Empirical Reappraisal.”Journal of Marketing Research 22 (February): 74–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrown, K.L. 1979. “Ethical Issues Involving the Protection of Marketing Research Practioners and Respondents”. InProceedings of the American Institute of Decision Sciences. J. F. Hair, ed., pp. 195–197.

  • Murphy, Patrick E. and Gene R. Laczniak. 1981. “Marketing Ethics: A Review with Implications for Managers, Educators and Researchs.” In:Review of Marketing, 1981 Ben M. Enis and Kenneth J. Roering, eds., Chicago: American Marketing Association, pp. 251–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Kenneth C. 1977. “Subject and Respondent Abuse in Marketing Research.”MSU Business Topics 25 (Spring): 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Kenneth C. and Cynthia K. Holm. 1982. “Deceptive Practices in Marketing Research: The Consumer’s Viewpoint.”California Management Review 24 (Spring): 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw, Barry M. and Eugene Szwajkowski. 1975. “The Scarcity-Munificence Component of Organizational Environments and the Commission of Illegal Acts.”Administrative Science Quarterly 20: 345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Paul W. 1975.Principles of Ethics: An Introduction. Encion, CA: Dickensen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, Linda K. 1986. “Ethical Decision Makign in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model.”Academy of Management Review 11:601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tull, Donald S. and Del I. Hawkins. 1987.Marketing Research: Measurement and Methods. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tybout, Alice M. and Gerald Zaltman. 1974. “Ethics in Marketing Research: Their Practical Relevance.”Journal of Marketing Research 11 (November): 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zey-Ferrell, Mary and O. C. Ferrell. 1982. “Role-Set Configuration and Opportunity as Predictors of Unethical Behavior in Organizations.”Human Relations 35: 567–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zikmund, Williams G. 1986.Exploring Marketing Research. Chicago, IL: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akaah, I.P., Riordan, E.A. The incidence of unethical practices in marketing research: An empricial investigation. JAMS 18, 143–152 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02726430

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02726430

Keywords

Navigation