Abstract
The authros examine from the perspective of marketing professionals the incidence of unethical research practices and the influence of organizational factors as determinants of the incidence of unethical research practices. The results indicate some degree of indicence of unethical research practices, particularly of those involving respondents. In addition, the results suggest four organizational variables— extent of ethical problems within the organization, top management actions on ethics, organizational role, and industry category—as determinants of the incidence of unethical research partices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achenbaum, Alvin, A. 1985. “Can We Tolerate a Double Standard in Marketing Research?”Journal of Advertising Research 25 (June/July): RC3-RC7.
Akaah, Ishmael P. and Edward A. Riordan. 1989. “Judgments of Marketing Professionals About Ethical Issues in Marketing Research: A Replication and Extension.”Journal of Marketing Research 26 (February): 112–120.
Armstrong, Scott J. and Terry S. Overton. 1977. “Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys.”Journal of Marketing Research 14 (August): 396–402.
Bartels, Robert. 1967. “A Model for Ethics in Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 21 (January): 20–26.
Baumhart, Raymond C. 1961. “How Ethical are Businessment?”Harvard Business Review 39 (July–August): 6–19, 156–176.
Bezilla, Robert, Joel B. Haynes, and Clifford Elliot. 1976. “Ethics in Marketing Research.”Business Horizons 19 (April): 83–86.
Blankenship, A.B. 1964. “Some Aspects of Ethics in Marketing Research.”Journal of Marketing Research 1 (May): 26–31.
Brenner, Steven N. and Earl A. Molander. 1977. “Is the Ethics of Business Changing?”Harvard Business Review 55 (January–February): 57–71.
Coe, Ted L. and Barbara Coe. 1976. “Marketing Research: The Search for Professionalism.” InMarketing: 1776–1976 and Beyond, Kenneth L. Bernhardt, ed. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, pp. 257–259.
Coney, Kenneth A. and John H. Murphy. 1976. “Attitudes of Marketers Toward Ethical and Professional Marketing Research Practices.” In:Proceedings: Southern Marketing Association, Henry W. Nash and Donald P. Robin, eds., pp. 172–174.
Crawford, Merle C. 1970. “Attitudes of Marketing Executives Toward Ethics in Marketing Research.”Journal of Marketing 34 (April): 46–52.
Ethics Resource Center. 1979.Codes of Ethics in Corporations and Trade Associations and the Teaching of Ethics in Graduate Business Schools. Princeton, NJ: Opion, Research.
Ferrell, O.C. and Larry G. Gresham. 1985. “A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision-Making in Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 49 (Summer): 87–96.
Ferrell, O.C. and Steven J. Skimer. 1988. “Ethical Behavior and Bureaucratic Structure in Marketing Research Organizations.”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (February): 103–109.
Fry, Fred L. and Robert J. Hock. 1976. “Who Claims Corporate Responsibility? The Biggest and the Worst.”Business and Society Review 18 (Summer): 62–65.
Gallup, George, Jr. 1987. “Marketing Execs Split on Question of Regulations.”Marketing News 21 (January) 10.
Gatignon, Hubert and Thomas S. Robertson. 1989. “Technology Diffusion: An Empirical Test of Comparative Effects.”Journal of Marketing 53 (January): 35–49.
Hunt, Shelby D. and Scott Vitell 1986. “A General Theory of Marketing Ethics.”Journal of Macromarketing (Spring) 5–16.
Hunt, Shelby D., Lawrence B. Chonko, and James B. Wilcox. 1984. “Ethical Problems of Marketing Researchers.”Journal of Marketing Research 21 (August): 309–324.
Laczniak, Gene R. 1983. “Business Ethics: A Manager’s Primer.”Business 33 (January–March): 23–29.
McDaniel, Stephen W., Perry Verille, and Charles S. Madden. 1985. “The Threats to Marketing Research: An Empirical Reappraisal.”Journal of Marketing Research 22 (February): 74–80.
McGrown, K.L. 1979. “Ethical Issues Involving the Protection of Marketing Research Practioners and Respondents”. InProceedings of the American Institute of Decision Sciences. J. F. Hair, ed., pp. 195–197.
Murphy, Patrick E. and Gene R. Laczniak. 1981. “Marketing Ethics: A Review with Implications for Managers, Educators and Researchs.” In:Review of Marketing, 1981 Ben M. Enis and Kenneth J. Roering, eds., Chicago: American Marketing Association, pp. 251–266.
Schneider, Kenneth C. 1977. “Subject and Respondent Abuse in Marketing Research.”MSU Business Topics 25 (Spring): 13–19.
Schneider, Kenneth C. and Cynthia K. Holm. 1982. “Deceptive Practices in Marketing Research: The Consumer’s Viewpoint.”California Management Review 24 (Spring): 89–96.
Staw, Barry M. and Eugene Szwajkowski. 1975. “The Scarcity-Munificence Component of Organizational Environments and the Commission of Illegal Acts.”Administrative Science Quarterly 20: 345–354.
Taylor, Paul W. 1975.Principles of Ethics: An Introduction. Encion, CA: Dickensen.
Trevino, Linda K. 1986. “Ethical Decision Makign in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model.”Academy of Management Review 11:601–617.
Tull, Donald S. and Del I. Hawkins. 1987.Marketing Research: Measurement and Methods. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Tybout, Alice M. and Gerald Zaltman. 1974. “Ethics in Marketing Research: Their Practical Relevance.”Journal of Marketing Research 11 (November): 357–368.
Zey-Ferrell, Mary and O. C. Ferrell. 1982. “Role-Set Configuration and Opportunity as Predictors of Unethical Behavior in Organizations.”Human Relations 35: 567–604.
Zikmund, Williams G. 1986.Exploring Marketing Research. Chicago, IL: Dryden.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akaah, I.P., Riordan, E.A. The incidence of unethical practices in marketing research: An empricial investigation. JAMS 18, 143–152 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02726430
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02726430