References
J. S. Danburg andG. R. Kalbfleisch:Phys. Rev. D,5, 1575 (1972).
P. A. M. Dirac:Proc. Roy. Soc. A126, 360 (1930);E. C. G. Stückelberg;Helv. Phys. Acta,14, 31L, 588 (1941);R. P. Feynman:Phys. Rev.,76, 749, 769 (1949).
O. M. P. Bilaniuk, V. K. Deshpande andE. C. G. Sudarshan:Am. Journ. Phys. 30, 718 (1962). (See alsoE. Recami:Giornale di Fisica,10, 195 (1969);V. S. Olkhovsky andE. Recami:Nuovo Cimento,63 A, 814 (1969).
L. Parker:Phys. Rev.,188, 2287 (1969);E. Recami andR. Recami andR. Mignani:Lett. Nuovo Cimento,4, 144 (1972). See alsoV. S. Olkhovsky andE. Recami:Lett. Nuovo Cimento,1, 165 (1971);Visnik Kievskogo Universitetu (Seria Fisiki),11, 58 (1970).
R. Mignani, E. Recami andU. Lombardo:Lett. Nuovo Cimento,4, 624 (1972);A. F. Antippa:Nuovo Cimento,10 A, 389 (1972).
R. Mignani andE. Recami:Nuovo Cimento,14 A, 169 (1973);16 A, 208 (1973);E. Recami andR. Mignani: preprint ITF, Kiev (to appear); an in preparation.
See ref. (3–6).L. Parker:Phys. Rev.,188, 2287 (1969);R. Mignai, E. Recami andUl Lombardo:Lett. Nuovo Cimento,4, 624 (1972).R. Mignani andE. Recami:Nuovo Cimento,14 A, 169 (1973). See alsoM. Baldo, G. Fonte andE. Recami:Lett. Nuovo Cimento,4, 241 (1970);R. Mignani andE. Recami:Lett. Nuovo Cimento,8, 110 (1973).
Actually, in ref. (6),16 A, 208 (1973);E. Recami andR. Mignani: preprint ITF, Kiev (to appear); an in preparation. it is shown that the notion of «antiparticle» is apurely relativistic one, in the sense that it may be derived within the mere framework of special relativity (together with the concept of «charge coniugation»Ĉ; here «charge» enters with its widest meaning).
It must be taken into account that time-reversal implies also velocity-reversal (v»−v) and impulse-reversal (p»−p). However, the combined operationTE implies still velocity-reversal butno longer impulse-reversalp (since energy-reversal means of course relativistic-mass-reversal).
Analogously, if we go on comprehensively considering both co-ordinate and momentum spaces, operationPT actually means operationPpTE, which results in aCPT operation.
G. Feinberg:Phys. Rev.,159, 1089 (1967);M. E. Arons andE. C. G. Sudarshan:Phys. Rev.,173, 1622 (1968);174, 1808 (1968);M. Baldo andE. Recami;Lett. Nuovo Cimento,2, 643 (1969);M. Glück:Nuovo Cimento,62 A, 791 (1969). See also ref. (7). See ref. (3–6)O. M. P. Billaniuk, V. K. Deshpande andE. C. G. Sudarshan:Am. Journ. Phys.,30, 718 (1962).L. Parker:Phys. Rev.,188, 2287 (1969);R. Mignai, E. Recami andUl Lombardo:Lett. Nuovo Cimento,4, 624 (1972).R. Mignani andE. Recami:Nuovo Cimento,14 A, 169 (1973). See alsognM. Baldo, G. Fonte andE. Recami:Lett. Nuovo Cimento,4, 241 (1970);R. Mignani andE. Recami:Lett. Nuovo Cimento,8, 110 (1973).
By the way, energy conservation holds of course also in generalized relativity theory, since covariance under time translations is still required even in the presence of tachyons and of Superluminal reference frames. See ref. (6).
Both subluminal and Superluminal (see ref. (6)).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Recami, E., Mignani, R. Comment on a recent experimental search for negative-energy tachyons. Lett. Nuovo Cimento 8, 780–782 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02725855
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02725855