Summary
A relativistic eikonal amplitude for the generalized ladder diagrams with radiative corrections to all orders is derived. The connection between this approach and the graphical analysis of infra-red divergence in quantum eleetrodynamics is explicitly exhibited. The discrepancy between the Lévy-Sucher formula and that of Schiff is resolved. Inclusion of radiative corrections due to nonsoft mesons at the vertices of a hard interaction is investigated, and the difference with results obtained by other authors is noted.
Riassunto
Si deduce un’ampiezza iconale relativistica per i diagrammi a scala generalizzati con correzioni radiative di tutti gli ordini. Si mostra esplicitamente la connessione fra questo approccio e l’analisi grafica delle divergenze infrarosse nell’elettrodinamica quantistica. Si risolve la discrepanza fra la formula di Lévy-Sucher e quella di Schiff. Si studia l’inclusione delle correzioni radiative dovute a mesoni non molli ai vertici delle interazioni dure e si nota la differenza con i risultati ottenuti da altri autori.
Реэюме
Выводится релятивистская амплитуда в приближении зйконала для обобшенных лестничных диаграмм с радиационными поправками ко всем порядка. Явно покаэывается свяэь между зтим подходом и графическим аналиэом инфракрасной расходимости в квантовой злектродинамике. Аналиэируется расхождение между формулой Леви-Щукера и формулой Щиффа. Исследуется включение радиационных поправок, обусловленных немягкими меэонами в верщинах « жесткого » вэаимодействия. Отмечается раэличие между реэультатами, полученными другими авторами.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. J. Glauber: inLectures in Theoretical Physics, edited byW. E. Brittin andL. G. Dunham, Vol.1 (New York, 1959), p. 315;M. M. Islam: inLectures in Theoretical Physics, edited byA. O. Barut andW. E. Brittin, Vol.10 B (New York, 1968), p. 97.
H. Cheng andT. T. Wu:Phys. Rev.,182, 1852, 1868 (1969);186, 1611 (1969).
H. D. I. Abarbanel andC. Itzykson:Phys. Rev. Lett.,23, 53 (1969).
B. M. Barbashov, S. P. Kuleshov, V. A. Matveev andA. N. Sissakian: JINR preprint E2-4692, Dubna (1969).
S. J. Chang andS. K. Ma:Phys. Rev. Lett.,22, 1334 (1969);Phys. Rev.,188, 2385 (1969).
M. Lévy andJ. Sucher:Phys. Rev.,186, 1656 (1969).
F. Englert, P. Nicoletopoulos, R. Brout andC. Truffin:Nuovo Cimento,64 A, 561 (1969).
E. A. Remler:Phys. Rev D,1, 1214 (1970).
York-Peng Yao:Phys. Rev. D,1, 2971 (1970).
B. M. Barbashov, S. P. Kuleshov, V. A. Matveev andA. N. Sissakian: JINR preprint E2-4983, Dubna (1970).
S. J. Chang:Phys. Rev. D,1, 2977 (1970).
H. M. Fried andT. K. Gaisser:Phys. Rev.,179, 1491 (1969);T. K. Gaisser:Phys. Rev. D,2, 1337 (1970).
S. Okubo:Nuovo Cimento,18, 70 (1960);K. E. Erikson:Nuovo Cimento,19, 1010 (1961);S. Weinberg:Phys. Rev.,140, B 516 (1965).
L. I. Schiff:Phys. Rev.,103, 443 (1956);D. S. Saxon andL. I. Schiff:Nuovo Cimento,6, 614 (1957).
On the basis of this argument Schiff’s original result is not correct, since the same potential was used for both soft and hard interactions. However, the physical picture employed, namely that large-angle scattering of ordern + 1 occurs as a single scattering through a large angle accompanied byn small-angle scatterings, is in complete agreement with eq. (2.18b). Comparison of eqs. (2.18a) and (2.18b) in fourth order with exact evaluation of Feynman diagrams show that (2.18a) gives correct asymptotic contribution fors → ∞ and |t| fixed, while (2.18b) is too large by a factor of 2 (M. Lévy andJ. Sucher:Phys. Rev. D,2, 1716 (1970)). Numerical evaluation of impact parameter amplitudes in potential scattering and comparison with exact phase-shift analysis show that even for large-angle scattering the Lévy-Sucher formula is better and provides a more accurate imaginary part of the amplitude than the Schiff formula (Y. Hahn:Phys. Rev. C,2, 775 (1970)).
D. R. Yennie, S. C. Frautschi andH. Suura:Ann. of Phys.,13, 379 (1961);D. R. Yennie: inBrandeis Summer Lectures in Theoretical Physics, Vol.1 (Waltham, Mass. 1963), p. 167.
Tables of Integral Transforms, edited byA. Erdelyi, Vol.2 (New York, 1954), p. 218.
Tables of Integral Transforms, edited byA. Erdelyi, Vol.1 (New York, 1954), p. 28.
G. Tiktopoulos andS. B. Treiman:Phys. Rev. D,3, 1037 (1971). These authors have pointed out that their earlier assertion (Phys. Rev. D,2, 805 (1970)) that the real terms of order 1/s in eq. (5.17) cancel is not valid.
S. Gasiorowicz:Elementary Particle Physics (New York, 1966), p. 463;J. J. Sakurai:Advanced Quantum Mechanics (Reading, Mass., 1967), p. 195.
H. D. I. Abarbanel, S. D. Drell andF. J. Gilman:Phys. Rev. Lett.,20, 280 (1968).
Actual unitarity correction in this model has been done in a different way; seeH. D. I. Abarbanel, S. D. Drell andF. J. Gilman:Phys. Rev.,177, 2458 (1969). Present field theory treatment indicates a unitarity correction of the type (6.10) to be more appropriate.
M. M. Islam andJ. Rosen:Phys. Rev. Lett.,22, 502 (1969);Phys. Rev.,185, 1917 (1969).
M. M. Islam:Lett. Nuovo Cimento,4, 447 (1970);Phys. Lett.,31 B, 313 (1970).
Interesting enough to note that study of high-energy scattering in quantum electrodynamics appears to substantiate a picture of this type; seeH. Cheng andT. T. Wu:Phys. Rev. Lett.,23, 670 (1969).
Recently electromagnetic radiative corrections to the weak amplitude have been calculated in this approximation byL. F. Li:Phys. Rev. D,2, 614 (1970). Thatk 2 i terms can be kept in the denominators of the propagators and all summations can still be carried out were also noted byLévy andSucher (footnote (14) of ref. (6)).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
To speed up publication, the author of this paper has agreed to not receive the proofs for correction.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Islam, M.M. Relativistic eikonal amplitude and radiative corrections. Nuov Cim A 5, 315–344 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723607
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723607