Skip to main content
Log in

A local approach to nonlocalizable fields

Локальный подход к нелокалиэуемым полям

  • Published:
Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)

Summary

The J. G. Taylor approach to nonlocalizable massless relativistic fields as weak limits of localizable (and local) ones is analysed. As a consequence of a break-down of the sharp local commutativity, acausal effects for nonlocalizable fields appear. Nevertheless, the commutator for the nonlocalizable fields has a strong exponential decrease for spacelike separations. This decrease is determined by the order of growth of the field in momentum space. The nonlocalizable fields, as they are constructed in this paper, satisfy many of the important properties of localizable (and local) fields.

Riassunto

Si esamina l’approccio di J. G. Taylor ai campi relativistici non localizzabili come limiti deboli di quelli localizzabili (e locali). In conseguenza della rottura della netta commutatività locale appaiono effetti acasuali per campi non localizzabili. Ciò nonostante il commutatore per i campi non localizzabili ha una forte decrescita esponenziale per separazioni di tipo spaziale. Questa decrescita è determinata dall’ordine di crescita del campo nello spazio degli impulsi. I campi non localizzabili, quali sono costruiti in questo articolo, soddisfano molte delle importanti proprietà dei campi localizzabili (e locali).

Реэюме

Предлагается подход к нелокалиэуемым релятивистским полям, которые рассматриваются, как слабые пределы локалиэуемых (и локальных) полей. В реэультате нарущения четкой локальной коммутативности для нелокалиэуемых полей появляются причинные зффекты. Тем не менее, коммутатор для нелокалиэуемых полей имеет сильное зкспоненциальное эатухание для пространственно-по добных интервалов. Это эатухание определяется порядком роста поля в импульсном пространстве. Нелокалиэуемые поля, в том виде, как они конструируются в зтой статье, удовлетворяют множеству важных свойств локалиэуемых (и локальных) полей.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Streater andA. Wightman:PCT, Spin and Statistics and All That (New York, 1964).

  2. R. Jost:The General Theory of Quantized Fields (Providence, R. I., 1965).

  3. K. Symanzik:Phys. Rev.,100, 743 (1957);N. Bogoliubov, B. Medvedev andM. Polivanov:Fortschr. Phys.,6, 169 (1958);H. Bremermann, R. Ohme andJ. G. Taylor:Phys. Rev.,109, 2178 (1958);H. Lehmann:Nuovo Cimento,10, 579 (1958).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. M. Jaffe:Phys. Rev.,158, 1454 (1967); preprint SLAC-PUB-250 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Constantinescu:Journ. Math. Phys., Nov. 1970, to appear.

  6. See, for instance,S. Gasiorowicz andD. Geffen:Rev. Mod. Phys.,41, 531 (1969), and references given there.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. See, for instance, the contributions in the report:Informal Meeting on Renormalization Theory, Trieste IC/69/121.

  8. A. Salam: Trieste preprint IC/70/7;J. G. Taylor: Southampton preprint, July 1970.

  9. O. Steinmann:Scattering formalism for nonlocalizable fields, preprint Zürich (1970).

  10. H. J. Borchers andK. Pohlmeyer:Comm. Math. Phys.,8, 269 (1968);K. Pohlmeyer:Comm. Math. Phys.,7, 80 (1968); about another possibility of choosing test functions see (5).

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. M. Jaffe:High-energy behaviour of strictly localizable fields, II.Mathematical tools, unpublished manuscript.

  12. See, for instance,W. Güttinger:Fortschr. Phys.,14, 483 (1966);G. B. Efimov: works on nonlocal field theory.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. M. Jaffe andJ. Glimm: works on models in quantum field theory.

  14. For other approaches which are different from the present one seeS. S. Khoruzhy:Phys. Lett.,26 B, 17 (1967);M. Z. Iofa: Kiew preprints (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. See, for instance,A. S. Wightman: contribution to theVienna Conference 1968.

  16. A. Martineau:Journ. Anal. Math.,9, 1 (1963).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. F. Treves:Topological Vector Spaces, Distributions and Kernels (New York, London, 1967).

  18. L. Hörmander:An Introduction to Complex Analysis in Several Dimensions (Princeton, N. J., 1967).

  19. The spacel ω(R 4) was defined in Sect.2 and corresponds to an indicatrixω(p 2). The Schwartz spaceS of functions vanishing at infinity faster than any power (together with all their derivatives) is dense inl.

  20. A. M. Jaffe:Journ. Math. Phys.,6, 1172 (1965).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. For the second part of (4.3) see, for instance, (12).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. M. Jaffe:Ann. of Phys.,32, 127 (1965).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. See the Appendix of (22)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blomer, R.J., Constantinescu, F. A local approach to nonlocalizable fields. Nuov Cim A 6, 62–78 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723434

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723434

Navigation