Skip to main content
Log in

Perceptual mapping using the basic structure matrix decomposition

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Perceptual mapping techniques are used to graphically represent perceptions of brands in a category, companies in an industry, and so forth. The data required to construct perceptual maps using typical methods can be difficult for respondents to provide and time-consuming to collect. An alternative, but relatively obscure perceptual mapping technique is rooted in correspondence analysis, and involves a fundamental matrix decomposition. Data requirements for this approach are simple. For example, a simple brand-attribute matrix, each cell containing the frequency of respondents stating that the respective attribute applies to the respective brand, could serve as the input data for the map. The data is treated as a contingency table, and the matrix whose elements are the deviations between observed and expected frequencies, adjusted for the respective expected frequencies, is decomposed to obtain the basic mapping coordinates. The resultant mapping approach is shown to be basically equivalent to correspondence analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benzécri, J.P., et al. 1973.L’Analyse des Donnees Vol. 11, L’Analyse des Correspondences. Paris: Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J.D., P.E. Green, and C.M. Schaffer 1986. “Interpoint Distance Comparisons in Correspondence Analysis.”Journal of Marketing Research 23 (August): 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckart, C. and G. Young. 1936. “The Approximation of One Matrix by Another of Lower Rank.”Psychometrika 1: 211–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, K. R. 1971. “The Biplot Graphic Display of Matrices with Applications to Principal Compoment Analysis.”Biometrika 58-3: 453–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, K. R. 1981. “Biplot Display of Multivariate Matrices for Inspectlon of Data and Diagnosis.” InInterpreting Multivariate Data. Ed. V. Barnett. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, I.J. 1964. “Some Applications of the Singular Decomposition of a Matrlx.”Technometrics 11-4.1 822–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graybill, F. A. 1969.Introduction to Matrices with Applications In Statistics. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Paul E. 1978.Analyzing Multivariate Data. Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and J.D. Carroll. 1976.Mathematical Tools For Applied Multivariate Analysis. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenacre, M.J. 1981. “Practical Correspondence Analysis.” InInterpreting Multivariate Data. Ed. V. Barnett, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenacre, M.J. 1984.Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D.L. and G.R. Franke, 1986. “Correspondence Analysis: Graphical Representation of Catagorical Data in Marketing Research.”Journal of Marketing Research 23(August): 213–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M.B., W.L. Moore, and R.S. Winer. 1982. “Constructing Joint Spaces from Pick-Any Data: A New Tool for Consumer Analysis.”Journal of Consumer Research 9: 99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Barbara B. 1983.Multivariate Data Analysis An Introduction. Homewood IL: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.A. 1971. “Market Segmentation. A Strategic Management Tool.”Journal of Marketing Research 8(February): 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebart, L. and A. Morineau. 1982. “SPAD. A System of Fortran Programs for Correspondence Analysis.”Journal of Marketing Research 19(November): 608–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebart, L., A. Morineau and K. Warwick. 1984.Multivariate Descriptive Statistical Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishisato, S. and I. Nishisato. 1980.Analysis of Categorical Data: Dual Scaling and Its Applications. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, S.J. 1972.Applied Multivariate Analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C.R. 1965. “The Use and Interpretation of Principal Component Analysis in Applied Research.”Sankhya: The Indian Journal of Statistics: Series A 26: 329–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Research Services. 1986.PASS Correspondence Analysis for the IBM-PC. Flossmoor, IL. Research Services Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ries, P. 1974. “Joint Space Analysis of Contingency Data.” Unpublished paper presented at Atlanta DSI meeting, October, 1974.

  • SAS Institute. 1982.SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. Raleigh, NC: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffé, H. 1959.The Analysis of Variance. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fox, R.J. Perceptual mapping using the basic structure matrix decomposition. JAMS 16, 47–59 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723325

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723325

Keywords

Navigation