References
Neldam S. Fetal movements: a comparison between maternal assessment and registration by measurement of dynamic ultrasound.Danish Med Bull 1982; 29:197.
Rayburn WF. Clinical implications from monitoring fetal activity.Am J Obst Gyn 1982; 144:967.
Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Ingardia CJ, Nockinson DJ. The fetal biophysical profile and its predictive value.Obstet Gynecol 1983; 62: 271.
Lenke RR, Nemes JM. Use of nipple stimulation to obtain contraction stress test.Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 345.
Tacher SB, Beckelman RB. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy and efficacy of selected antepartum surveillance technique.Obstet Gynecol Survey 1986; 41:121.
Manning FA, Morrison I, Lange IR et al. Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: experience in 12.620 referred high risk pregnancies I. Perinatal morbidity by frequency and etiology.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151 : 343.
Reuwer PJHM, Bruinse HW, Stoutenbeek P, Haspels AA. Doppler assessment of the feto-placental circulation in normal and growth retarded fetuses.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1984; 18:199.
Reuwer PJHM, Sijmons EA, Rietman GW, et al. Intrauterine growth retardation: prediction of perinatal distress by Doppler ultrasound.Lancet 1987; ii : 415–418.
Trudinger BT, Cook CM, Giles WB, Connelly A, Thompson RS. Umbilical artery flow velocity wave form in high risk pregnancy.Lancet 1987; i: 188.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bruinse, H.W., Reuwer, P.J. Predicting fetal distress. Indian J Pediatr 56, 451–454 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02722411
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02722411