Skip to main content
Log in

Using empirical data to investigate the likelihood of brands being admitted or readmitted into an established evoked set

  • Research Notes
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Empirical data is used to follow the maturation and change an evoked set exhibits as the decision-maker proceeds to a final choice. Results indicate that after an evoked set has been established, a subject is more likely to include newly found brands in his evoked set versus previously rejected brands even though additional positive information had been received for the previously rejected brands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bettman, James R. and Jacob Jacoby. 1976. “Patterns of Processing in Consumer Information Acquisition.” InAdvances in Consumer Research. Ed. B. B. Anderson. vol. 3. Cincinnati, Ohio. Association for Consumer Research, 315–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Yvonne M. M., Stephen E. Fienberg, and Paul W. Holland. 1975.Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, Geoffrey P. 1962.Portfolio Selection: A Simulation of Trust Investment. Dissertation. Ford Foundation, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, Richard M. and James G. March. 1963.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Monroe. 1977. “Consumer Use of Informational Aids in Supermarkets.”Journal of Consumer Affairs 11.1 (Summer) 78–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, Jacob. 1974. “Consumer Reaction to Information Displays: Packaging and Advertising.” InAdvertising and the Public Interest. Ed. S. F. Divita. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Robert W. Chestnut, Karl C. Weigl, and William A. Fisher. 1976. “Pre-Purchase Information Acquisition: Description of a Process Methodology, Research Paradigm, and Pilot Investigation.” InAdvances in Consumer Research. Ed. B. B. Anderson. vol. 3. Cincinnati, Ohio., Association for Consumer Research, 306–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Donald E. Speller, and Carol A. Kohn. 1974. “Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load.”Journal of Marketing Research 11 (February): 63–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, George J. Szybillo, and Jacqueline Busato-Schach. 1977. “Information Acquisition Behavior in Brand Choice Situations,”Journal of Consumer Research 3 (March). 209–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn-Berning, Carol A. and Jacob Jacoby. 1974. “Patterns of Information Acquisition in New Product Purchases.”Journal of Consumer Research 1 (September). 18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lussier, Denis A. and Richard W. Olshavsky. 1979. “Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Brand Choice.”Journal of Consumer Research 6 (September): 154–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. Whan. 1978. “A Conflict Resolution Choice Model.”Journal of Consumer Research 5 (September), 124–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, John W. 1976. “Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Decision Making: An Information Search and Protocol Analysis.”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16.2 (August): 366–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winer, J. B. 1971.Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. Second Edition. New York. McGraw-Hill Book Company, 399–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Peter. 1975. “Consumer Choice Strategies: Simplifying Vs. Optimizing.”Journal of Marketing Research 12 (February): 60–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Fredrick Barbour. 1977. “Phased Decision Strategies. Sequels to an Initial Screening.” InStudies in Management Science. Multiple Criteria Decision-Making. Eds. M. K. Starr and M. Zeleny. New York: North-Holland, 91–110.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sutton, R.J. Using empirical data to investigate the likelihood of brands being admitted or readmitted into an established evoked set. JAMS 15, 82–89 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02722174

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02722174

Keywords

Navigation