Abstract
The persuasive effectiveness of message sidedness (one versus two-sided messages) and message structure was assessed in the context of a personal selling appeal for a new home computer to an unfamiliar target audience. Contrary to some prior research, two-sided appeals were found to be less, not more, effective in promoting seller credibility and message acceptance than onesided appeals. To some extent, however, this effect was attenuated by placing unfavorable product arguments at the end rather than the beginning of the selling appeal. To account for these findings, a disarming effect is proposed. People who have little or no, knowledge regarding a seller’s particular offering tend to be disarmed by two-sided appeals. As a result, they discount the seller’s product-related knowledge. This effect is thought to be more pronounced when the unfavorable information is presented at the beginning of the message.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Belch, George E. 1981. “An Examination of Comparative and Non-comparative Television Commercials: The Effects of Claim Variation and Repetition on Cognitive Response and Message Acceptance”.Journal of Marketing Research 19 (August): 333–49.
— 1983. “The Effects of Message Modality on Oneand TwoSided Advertising Message”. In Richard P. Bagozzi and Alice M. Tybout (eds.),Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 10, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Association for Consumer Research, 21–26.
Chu, Godwin C. 1967. “Prior Familiarity, Perceived Bias, and One-Sided Versus Two-Sided Communications.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 3 (July): 243–54.
Eagly, Alice H., Wendy Wood and Shelly Chaiken. 1978. “Causal Inferences About Communicators and Their Effects on Opinion Change”.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36 (April). 424–35.
—, and Wendy Wood. 1981. “An Attributional Analysis of Persuasion”. InNew Directions in Attributional Research. Eds. J.H. Harvey et al. Hillsdale: Lawrence A. Erlbaum, Assoc.
Golden, Linda L. and Mark I. Alpert. 1978. “The Relative Effectiveness of One-Sided and Two-Sided Communication for Mass Transit Advertising”. In H. Keith Hunt (ed.),Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 5, Ann Arbor, Michigan: Association for Consumer Research, 12–18.
Haas, Glen R. and Darwyn E. Linder. 1972. “Counterargument availability and the Effects of Message Structure on Persuasion”.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 23 (August): 219–33.
Hovland, Carl I., Arthur A. Lumsdaine and Fred D. Scheffield, 1949.Experiments on Mass Communication. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hunt, James M., Theresa J. Domzal, Jerome B. Kernan. 1982. “Causal Attributions and Persuasion: The Case of Disconfirmed Expectancies”. In Andrew Mitchell (ed.),Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 9, Ann Arbor, Michigan: Association for Consumer Research, 287–92
—. 1984. “The Role of Disconfirmed Expectancies in the Processing of Advertising Messages”.Journal of Social Psychology 124 (December): 227–37.
Janis, Irving L. and Feierabend, R.L. 1957. “Effects of Alternate Ways of Ordering Pro and Con Arguments in Persuasive Communications”. inThe Order of Presentation in Persuasion. ed. C.I. Hovland, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Jones, Russel A. and Jack W. Brehm. 1970. “Persuasiveness of Oneand Two-Sided Communications as a Function of Awareness There are Two Sides”.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 6 (January). 47–56.
Lumsdaine, Arthur A. and Irving L. Janis. 1953. “Resistance to ‘Counter-propaganda’ Produced by One-Sided and Two-Sided ‘Propaganda’ Presentations”.Public Opinion Quarterly 17 (Fall). 311–18.
Mazis, Michael B. 1976. “A Theoretical and Empirical Examination of Comparative Advertising”. Faculty Working Paper. University of Florida.
Settle, Robert B. and Linda L. Golden. 1974. “Attribution Theory and Advertising Credibility”.Journal of Marketing Research 11 (May). 181–85.
Smith, Robert E. and Shelby D. Hunt. 1978. “Attributional Processes and Effects in Promotional Situations”.Journal of Consumer Research 5 (December). 149–58.
Sternthal, Brian, Lynn W. Phillips and Ruby Dholakia. 1978. “The Persuasive Effect of Source Credibility: A Situational Analysis”.Public Opinion Quarterly 42 (Fall): 285–314.
Swinyard, William R. 1981. “The Interaction Between Comparative Advertising and copy Claim Variation”.Journal of Marketing Research 18 (May): 175–86.
Walster, Elaine E., Elliot Aronson, and Darcy Abrahams. 1966. “On Increasing the Persuasiveness of a Low Prestige Communicator”.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2 (October). 325–42.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hunt, J.M., Smith, M.F. The persuasive impact of two-sided selling appeals for an unknown brand name. JAMS 15, 11–18 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721949
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721949