Skip to main content
Log in

Stamps versus postal permits: A decisional guide for return postage in mail questionnaires

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Considerable evidence indicates that stamped return envelopes prompt higher rates of response than business reply permits. The authors use a measure of margin efficiency gains between return postage types to develop optimum cost guidelines to aid mail survey researchers in their choices between return mailer types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boyd, H. W., Jr., R. Westfall, and S. F. Stasch.Marketing Research: Text and Cases. Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cox, E. P., III, W. T. Anderson, and D. Fulcher: “Reappraising Mail Survey Response Rates”,Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (November 1974), 413–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Erdos, P. L.Professional Mail Surveys. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Etzel, M. J. and B. J. Walker. “Effects of Alternative Follow-Up Procedures on Mail Survey Response Rates”,Journal of Applied Psychology, 59 (April 1974), 219–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferris, A. L. “A Note on Stimulating Response to Questionnaires”,American Sociological Review, 16 (April 1951), 247–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gullahorn, J. T. and J. F. Gullahorn. “Increasing Returns from Non-respondents”,Public Opinion Quarterly, 23 (Spring 1959), 119–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hammond, E. C. “Inhalation in Relation to Type and Amount of Smoking”,American Statistical Association Journal, 54 (March 1959), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Harris, James R. and Hugh J. Guffey, Jr. “Questionnaire Returns: Stamps Versus Business Reply Envelopes Revisited”,Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (May 1978), 290–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanuk, L. and C. Berenson. “Mail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review”,Journal of Marketing Research, 12 (November 1975), 440–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kerlinger, F. N.Foundations of Behavioral Research New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kimball, A. E. “Increasing the Rate of Return in Mail Surveys”,Journal of Marketing, 25 (October 1961), 63–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Linksy, A. S. “Stimulating Responses to Mailed Questionnaires: A Review”,Public Opinion Quarterly 21 (Spring 1975), 84–101.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Robinson, R. A. and P. Agism. “Making Mail Surveys More Reliable”,Journal of Marketing, 15 (April 1951), 415–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Veiga, J. F. “Getting the Mail Questionnaire Returned: Some Practical Research Considerations”,Journal of Applied Psychology, 59 (April 1974) 219–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Watson, J. J. “Improving Response Rate in Mail Research”,Journal of Advertising Research, 5 (June 1965), 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zaltman, G. andP. C. Burger.Marketing Research: Fundamentals and Dynamics. Hinsdale, Ill.: Dryden Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guffey, H.J., Harris, J.R. & Guffey, M.M. Stamps versus postal permits: A decisional guide for return postage in mail questionnaires. JAMS 8, 234–242 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721886

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721886

Keywords

Navigation