Advertisement

Practical Failure Analysis

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 75–83 | Cite as

Evaluation and optimization of the engineering properties of polymer-modified asphalt

  • J. -S. Chen
  • M. -C. Liao
  • H. -H. Tsai
Peer Reviewed Articles

Abstract

Polymers are increasingly being used to modify asphalt and enhance highway pavement performance. This paper reports the development of a procedure to evaluate and optimize a polymer-modified asphalt (PMA). Two asphalt cements and two styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) copolymers were mixed at ten concentration levels. The engineering properties and morphologies of the binders were investigated using a dynamic shear rheometer, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and other rheological techniques. The morphology of the PMA was characterized by the SBS concentration and the microstructure of the copolymer. Polymer modification increased the elastic responses and dynamic moduli of asphalt binders. As the SBS concentration increased, the copolymer gradually became the dominant phase, accompanied by a change in engineering properties. Results from SEM demonstrated that, up to 6% concentration, good compatibility exists between SBS and asphalt binder. The modified binders show either a continuous asphalt phase with dispersed SBS particles or a continuous polymer phase with dispersed asphalt globules, or two interlocked continuous phases. The optimum SBS content was determined based on the formation of a critical network between asphalt and polymer.

Keywords

polymer-modified asphalt styrene-butadiene-styrene compatibility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T.S. Shuler, D.L. Hanson, and R.G. McKeen: “Design and Construction of Asphalt Concrete Using Polymer Modified Asphalt Binders,”Polymer Modified Asphalt Binders, ASTM STP1108, ASTM, W. Conshohocken, PA, 1992, pp. 97–128.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    F.S. Choquet and E.J. Ista: “The Determination of SBS, EVA and APP Polymers in Modified Bitumens,”Polymer Modified Asphalt Binders, ASTM STP1108, ASTM, W. Conshohocken, PA, 1992, pp. 35–49.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L.H. Lewandowski: “Polymer Modification of Paving Asphalt Binders,”Rubber Chem. Technol., 1994,67, pp. 447–480.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. Bonemazzi, V. Braga, R. Corrieri, C. Giavarini, and F. Sartori: “Characteristics of Polymers and Polymer-Modified Binders,”Transportation Research Record 1535, 1996, pp. 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Maccarrone, G. Holleran, and G.P. Gnanaseelan: “Properties of Polymer Modified Binders and Relationship to Mix and Pavement Performance,“J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol., 1996,64, pp. 209–240.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Hernandez, R. Rodriguez, R. Blanco, and V.M. Castano: “Mechanical Properties of the Composite Asphalt-Styrene-Butadiene Copolymer,”Inter. J. Polym. Mater., 1997,35, pp. 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H.I. Al-Dubabe, W. Al-Abdul, I.M. Asi, and M.F. Ali: “Polymer Modification of Arab Asphalt,”J. Mater. Civil Eng., 1998,10, pp. 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.J. Khattak and G.Y. Baladi: “Engineering Properties of Polymer-Modified Asphalt Mixture,”Transportation Research Record 1638, 1998, pp. 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Lesueur, J.F. Gerard, P. Letoffe, J.M. Letoffe, D. Martin, and J.P Planche: “Polymer Modified Asphalts as Viscoelastic Emulsions,”J. Rheol, 1998,42, pp. 1059–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    U. Isacsson and X. Lu: “Laboratory Investigation of Polymer Modified Bitumens,”J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol., 1999,68, pp. 35–63.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Panda and M. Mazumdar: Engineering Properties of EVA-Modified Bitumen Binder for Paving Mixes,J. Mater. Civil Eng., 1999,11, pp. 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    K.W. McKay, W.A. Gros, and C.F. Diehl: “The Influence of Styrene-Butadiene Diblock Copolymer and Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene Triblock Copolymer Properties and Product Performance,”J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1995,56, pp. 947–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Blanco, R. Rodriguez, M. Garcia-Garduno, and V.M. Castano: “Morphology and Tensile Properties of Styrene-Butadiene Copolymer Reinforced Asphalt,”J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1995,56, pp. 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Adedeji, T. Grunfelder, F.S. Battes, C.W. Macosko, M. Stroup-Gardiner, and D.E. Newcomb: “Asphalt Modified by SBS Triblock Copolymer: Structures and Properties,”Polym. Eng. Sci., 1996,36, pp. 1701–1723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    X. Lu, U. Isacsson, and J. Ekblad: “Phase Separation of SBS Polymer Modified Bitumens,”J. Mater. Civil Eng., 1999,11, pp. 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Kraus: “Modification of Asphalt by Block Polymers of Butadiene and Styrene,”Rubber Chem. Technol., 1982,55, pp. 1389–1402.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Anon.: “StandardTestMethodforToughness and Tenacity of Bituminous Materials,” ASTM D 5801,Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 04.03, ASTM, W. Conshohocken, PA, 1999.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    G.H. Michler: “Electron Microscopic Investigations of Morphology and Structure Formation of Polymers,”J. Macromol. Sci., 1996,35, pp. 329–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R.L. Schalek and L.T. Drzal: “Characterization of Advanced Materials Using SEM,”J. Adv. Mater., 2000,2, pp. 32–38.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    L. Loeber, O. Sutton, J. Morel, J.M. Valleton, and G. Muller: “New Direction Observations of Asphalts and Asphalt Binders by Scanning Electron Microscopy,”J. Microsc., 1996,182, pp. 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Anon.: “Standard Specification for Type IV Polymer-Modified Asphalt Cement for Use in Pavement Construction,” ASTM D 5892,Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 04.03, ASTM, W. Conshohocken, PA, 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International - The Materials Information Society 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. -S. Chen
    • 1
  • M. -C. Liao
    • 1
  • H. -H. Tsai
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan, R.O.C.

Personalised recommendations