Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Television and education: A review of research

  • Articles
  • Published:
Audiovisual communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The existing research on television of interest to educators was analyzed and found to be grouped into four general categories: (a) studies of the general social effects of television, (b) content analyses, (c) studies of the educational effects of television, and (d) technical studies. Studies in each of these four categories were reviewed and generalizations drawn from them. No attempt was made to review related research that is, no doubt, applicable to the problems of television. For example, the vast amount of research information developed in the audio-visual field during the past 30 years was not touched. Future investigators will find that the existing television research and the existing audio-visual research provide only a sketch map of the field of audio-visual communication. To use these important instruments wisely, and this is particularly true of television, it is necessary that we know and understand much more. This is the challenge for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Besco, G. S. Television and its effects on other related interests of high school students.English Journal, 1952,41, 151–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bradway, Bruce M. Four year study of high school students’ TV habits indicates definite viewing trends.Advertising Age, July 23, 1951, 47–48.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bradway, Bruce M. How television viewing has changed the family life of South Shore High School students.Advertising Age, July 30, 1951, 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Broderick, Gertrude G.Radio and television bibliography. U. S. Office of Education Bulletin No. 17. Washington: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carlson, Margaret. Unpublished study reported by Witty (51).

  6. Clarke, Walter J.Of children and television. Cincinnati, Ohio: Xavier University, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coffin, Thomas E. Television’s effects on leisure-time activities.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1948,34, 550–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dunham, Franklin. Effect of television on the school achievement of children.School Life, 1952,34, 88–89.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eakin, M. K. Television in education.Elementary School Journal, 1951,52, 129–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Evry, Hal.TV’s impact on education. Los Angeles: Woodbury College, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fearing, Franklin, and Rogge, Genevieve. A selected bibliography in communications research.The Quarterly of Film, Radio and Television, 1952,6, 283–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gable, M. A. Viewer’s views on classroom TV.Educational Screen, 1951,30, 226–227.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gessleman, D. B. Television and reading.Elementary English, 1951,28, 385–391.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goldberg, Herman D. Liking and retention of a simulcast.Public Opinion Quarterly, 1950,14, 141–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gould, Jack. Pupils’ time spent at TV rivals hours in classes.The New York Times, March 6, 1950.

  16. Hofstetter, H. W. A survey of visual complaints related to television.American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry. 1949,26, 483–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jenssen, Ward J. Unpublished study on the effect of TV on the motion picture industry. Applied Psychology Associates, 6042 Second Avenue, Los Angeles 43, California.

  18. Kingson, Walter. The second New York television survey.The Quarterly of Film, Radio and Television, 1952,6, 317–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lewis, Philip. Television settles down.Clearing House, 1951,26, 168–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lewis, Philip. Teen-agers tame TV.Educational Screen, 1951,30, 174–175.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lewis, Philip. TV’s impact on teenagers.Phi Delta Kappan, 1951,33, 118–120.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lewis, Philip. TV takes a test.Educational Screen, 1950,29, 196–198.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Maccoby, Eleanor E. Television: its impact on school children.Public Opinion Quarterly, 1951,15, 421–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McDonagh, Edward D., and Associates. Television and the family.Sociology and Social Research, 1950,35, 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  25. McGinnis, W. C. Now it’s television.Journal of Education, 1950,133, 152–154.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Orme, Frank. Crime on television … A record of L. A. stations, May 1–7.TV, 1951,4, 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Orme, Frank. Crime on television … A record of L. A. stations, May 24–30, 1952.TV, 1952,5, 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Riley, John W., Cantwell, Frank V., and Ruttiger, Katherine F. Some observations on the social effects of television.Public Opinion Quarterly, 1949,13, 223–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rock, Robert T., Jr., Duva, James S., and Murray, John E.The comparative effectiveness of instruction by television, television recordings and conventional classroom procedures. NAVEXOS P-850-2. Port Washington, L. I., New York: Special Devices Center, U. S. Navy.

  30. Rock, Robert T., Jr., Duva, James S., and Murray, John E.Training by television: a study in learning and retention. NAVEXOS P-850-3. Port Washington, L. I., New York: Special Devices Center, U. S. Navy.

  31. Rose, Oscar, editor.Radio broadcasting and television: an annotated bibliography. New York: H. W. Wilson, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rutter, George W. A. Unpublished study reported by Witty (51). Television and the high school student.Education, 1951,62, 242–251.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Seagoe, May V. Children’s television habits and preferences.The Quarterly of Film, Radio and Television, 1951,6, 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Seagoe, May V. A score sheet for children’s television.The Quarterly of Film, Radio and Television, 1952,6, 327–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Seagoe, May V. some current research in television for children.California Journal of Educational Research, 1952,3, 151–153.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Silvey, Robert. Methods of viewer research employed by the British Broadcasting Corporation.Public Opinion Quarterly, 1951,15, 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Silvey, Robert. Television viewing in Britain.Public Opinion Quarterly, 1950,14, 148–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Smythe, Dallas W. An analysis of television programs.Scientific American, 1951,184, 15–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Smythe, Dallas W., and Campbell, Angus.Los Angeles television, May 23–29, 1951. Urbana, Illinois: National Association of Educational Broadcasters, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Stanley, DeGraff.A summary report and evaluation of San Diego City schools—KFMB-TV Channel 8 educational television experiment. San Diego, California: San Diego City Schools, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Stein, Harold, and Hofstetter, H. W. Effects of prolonged television viewing on certain optometric findings.American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry, 1951,28, 520–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Stein, Harold, Hofstetter, H. W., and Graham, Robert. The effect of light absorbing filters on the discernibility of a television test pattern.American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry, 1951,28, 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Swanson, Charles E., and Jones, R. L. Television owning and its correlates.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1951,35, 352–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. TV—Enemy of education?Senior Scholastic, 1950,57, 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  45. TV lifts students’ grades in Texas but lowers them in N. J.Advertising Age, March 20, 1950.

  46. TV hurts grades of sophs and juniors but helps seniors.Advertising Age, May 8, 1950.

  47. Wilson, Meredith C., and Moe, Edward O.Effectiveness of television in teaching sewing practices. Extension Service Circular No. 466, U. S. Department of Agriculture. Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office, June, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Witty, Paul A. Children’s interest in comics, radio, motion pictures, and TV.Educational Administration and Supervision, 1952,38, 138–147.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Witty, Paul A. Interest in TV and success in school.Educational Administration and Supervision, 1951,37, 193–210.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Witty, Paul A. Television and the educative process.School and Society, 1951,74, 369–372.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Witty, Paul A. Television and the high school student.Education, 1951,62, 242–251.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Witty, Paul A. Television as an aid to instruction.School and Society, 1951,74, 273–276.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Witty, Paul A. Two studies of children’s interest in TV.Elementary English, 1952,29, 251–257.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Young, Gertrude. Operation video.Clearing House, 1950,24, 156–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. James D. Finn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

To the knowledge of the editor, this is the first comprebensive review of educational television research to be published. The organizing of the research into four categories—general social effects, content analyses, educational effects, and technical problems—the rather detailed reviewing of the results, and the drawing of general conclusions should greatly aid the educator in understanding the unique contributions of educational television. An attempt will be made in future issues of Audio-Visual Communication Review to supplement this review of research by regularly publishing, in “Research Abstracts,” reviews of the most recent television studies. Dr. James D. Finn is Associate Professor of Education and Chairman of the Audio-Visual Education Department, University of Southern California.

This paper was originally prepared at the request of the California State Department of Education for inclusion in theBrochure of Background Materials: Educational Television for the Governor’s Conference on Educational Television, held in Sacramento, California, December 15–16, 1952. It was necessary to develop the material in a very short time, and the writer wishes to express his indebtedness to F. Dean McClusky and May V. Seagoe of the University of California, Los Angeles, and to Lester F. Beck and Nicholas Rose, his colleagues at the University of Southern California, as well as to several of his graduate students for helping in locating copies of the studies reviewed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Finn, J.D. Television and education: A review of research. ETR&D 1, 106–126 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02716988

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02716988

Keywords

Search

Navigation