Sadhana

, Volume 31, Issue 5, pp 557–581 | Cite as

Simultaneous measurement of aerodynamic and heat transfer data for large angle blunt cones in hypersonic shock tunnel

  • Niranjan Sahoo
  • S. Saravanan
  • G. Jagadeesh
  • K. P. J. Reddy
Article

Abstract

Aerodynamic forces and fore-body convective surface heat transfer rates over a 60° apex-angle blunt cone have been simultaneously measured at a nominal Mach number of 5.75 in the hypersonic shock tunnel HST2. An aluminum model incorporating a three-component accelerometer-based balance system for measuring the aerodynamic forces and an array of platinum thin-film gauges deposited on thermally insulating backing material flush mounted on the model surface is used for convective surface heat transfer measurement in the investigations. The measured value of the drag coefficient varies by about ± 6% from the theoretically estimated value based on the modified Newtonian theory, while the axi-symmetric Navier-Stokes computations overpredict the drag coefficient by about 9%. The normalized values of measured heat transfer rates at 0‡ angle of attack are about 11% higher than the theoretically estimated values. The aerodynamic and the heat transfer data presented here are very valuable for the validation of CFD codes used for the numerical computation of flow fields around hypersonic vehicles.

Keywords

Aerodynamic and heat transfer data large angle blunt cone hypersonic flow shock tunnel 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdel-Jawad M M, Mee D J, Morgan R G, Jacobs, P A, Philpot J A 2001 Transient force measurements at superorbital speeds.Proc. 23rd Int. Symp. on Shock Waves (ed.) F K Lu, Fort Worth, TX, pp. 515–521Google Scholar
  2. Alan P, Kennith L G 1965High-speed wind tunnel testing (New York: John Wiley & Sons)Google Scholar
  3. Anderson J D Jr 1989Hypersonic and high temperature gas dynamics (Series in Aeronautical and Aerospace Engineering) (New York: McGraw-Hill)Google Scholar
  4. Brian R H, John N P 1997 High enthalpy aerothermodynamics of a Mars entry vehicle Part 1: Experimental results,J. Spacecr. Rockets 34: 449–456Google Scholar
  5. Cook W J, Felderman E J 1966 Reduction of data from thin film heat transfer gauge: A concise numerical technique.AIAA J. 4: 561–562Google Scholar
  6. Fay J A, Riddell F R 1958 Theory of stagnation point heat transfer in dissociated air.J. Aeronaut. Sci. 25: 73–85MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Hollis B R 1995 User’s manual for the one-dimensional hypersonic experimental aero thermodynamic (1DHEAT) data reduction code. NASA CR-4961Google Scholar
  8. Hollis B R, Perkins J N 1996 High enthalpy and perfect gas heating measurements on a blunt cone.J. Spacecr. Rockets 33: 628–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jagadeesh G 1997Experimental investigations of the flow-fields around large angle blunt cones flying at hypersonic Mach number. Ph D thesis, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  10. Jagadeesh G, Reddy N M, Nagashetty K, Reddy, K P J 2000 Fore body convective hypersonic heat transfer measurements over large angle blunt cones.J. Spacecr. Rockets 37: 137–139Google Scholar
  11. Jessen C, Gronig H 1989 A new principle for a short-duration six component balance.Exp. Fluids 8: 231–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Joshi M V, Reddy N M 1986 Aerodynamic force measurements over missile configurations in IISc shock tunnel at M = 5.5.Exp. Fluids 4: 338–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee J Y, Lewis M J 1993 Numerical study of the flow establishment time in hypersonic shock tunnels.J Spacecr. Rockets 30: 152–163Google Scholar
  14. Mee D J, Daniel W J T, Simmons J M 1996 Three-component force balance for flows of millisecond duration.AIAA J. 34: 590–595Google Scholar
  15. Mee D J 1993 Uncertainties analysis of conditions in test section of the T4 shock tunnel, Research Report No: 4/93, Center for Hypersonics, University of Queensland, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  16. Naumann K W, Ende H, Mathieu G, George A 1993 Millisecond aerodynamic force measurement with side-jet model in ISL shock tunnel.AIAA J. 31: 1068–1074Google Scholar
  17. Olivier H, Gronig H 1995 Hypersonic model testing in a shock tunnel.AIAA J. 33: 262–265Google Scholar
  18. Peter F I, Donn B K 1987 High-speed aerodynamics of several blunt-cone configurations.J. Spacecr. Rockets 24: 127–132Google Scholar
  19. Raju C, Reddy N M 1990 Aerodynamic force measurements over missile configurations in IISc shock tunnel at M = 3.85 and 9.15.Exp. Fluids 10: 75–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reddy N M 1980 Heating rate measurements over 30‡ and 40‡ (half-angle) blunt cones in air and helium in the Langley expansion tube facility. NASA TM-80207Google Scholar
  21. Reddy N M 1985 Development of a three-component balance for use in a shock tunnel, High Enthalpy Aerodynamic Report No. 85 HEA 2 Serial No. 04, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  22. Sahoo N, Mahapatra D R, Jagadeesh G, Gopalakrishnan S, Reddy K P J 2002 Aerodynamic force measurements on 60‡ apex angle blunt cones flying at Mach 5.75 using a three-component accelerometer balance.AIAA Paper 2002-5204Google Scholar
  23. Sahoo N, Mahapatra D R, Jagadeesh G, Gopalakrishnan S, Reddy K P J 2003 An accelerometer balance system for measurement of aerodynamic force coefficients over blunt bodies in a hypersonic shock tunnel.Meas. Sci. Technol. 14: 260–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sahoo N 2003Simultaneous measurement of aerodynamic forces and convective surface heat transfer rates for large angle blunt cones in hypersonic shock tunnel, Ph D thesis, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.Google Scholar
  25. Schultz D L, Jones T V 1973 Heat transfer measurements in short-duration hypersonic facilities. AGARDograph No. 165.Google Scholar
  26. Srinivasa P 1991Experimental investigations of hypersonic flow over a bulbous heat shield at Mach number 6. Ph D thesis, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.Google Scholar
  27. Stewart D A, Chen Y K 1994 Hypersonic convective heat transfer over 140‡ blunt cones in different gases.J. Spacecr. Rockets 31: 735–743Google Scholar
  28. Truitt R W 1959Hypersonic aerodynamics (New York: Ronald Press)Google Scholar
  29. Vidal R J 1956 Model instrumentation techniques for heat transfer and force measurements in a hypersonic shock tunnel. Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory Report, WADC TN 56–315Google Scholar
  30. Viren M, Saravanan S, Jagadeesh G, Reddy K P J 2002 Aerodynamic drag reduction using aero-spikes for large angle blunt cone flying at hypersonic Mach number. AIAA Paper 2002-2709Google Scholar
  31. Viren M 2003Investigations of aero-spike induced flow field modifications around a large angle blunt cone flying at hypersonic Mach number. Ph D thesis, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, BangaloreGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Niranjan Sahoo
    • 1
  • S. Saravanan
    • 2
  • G. Jagadeesh
    • 2
  • K. P. J. Reddy
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyGuwahatiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Aerospace EngineeringIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations