Journal of Genetics

, Volume 83, Issue 1, pp 3–6 | Cite as

Genetic correlations: Transient truths of adaptive evolution

  • N. G. Prasad
  • Mallikarjun N. Shakarad
Research Commentary


genetic architecture life history experimental evolution genetic correlations genotype x environment interaction stress resistance Drosophila melanogaster 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Archer M. A., Phelan J. P., Beckman K. A. and Rose M. R. 2003 Breakdown in correlations during laboratory evolution. II. Selection on stress resistance inDrosophila populations.Evolution 57, 536–543.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballabeni P. and Rahier M. 2000 A quantitative genetic analysis of leaf beetle larval performance on two natural hosts: including a mixed diet.J. Evol. Biol. 13, 98–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell G. 1997Selection: the mechanism of evolution. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Chippindale A. K., Leroi A. M., Kim S. B. and Rose M. R. 1993 Phenotypic plasticity and selection inDrosophila life-history evolution. I. Nutrition and the cost of reproduction.J. Evol. Biol. 6, 171–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chippindale A. K., Ngo A. L. and Rose M. R. 2003 The devil in the details of life-history evolution: instability and reversal of genetic correlations during selection onDrosophila development.J. Genet. 82, 133–145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Falconer D. S. 1981Introduction to quantitative genetics, 2nd ed. Longman, London.Google Scholar
  7. Joshi A. and Thompson J. N. 1995 Trade-offs and the evolution of host specialization.Evol. Ecol. 9, 82–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Joshi A. and Thompson J. N. 1997 Adaptation and specialization in a two-resource environment inDrosophila species.Evolution 51, 846–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Phelan J. P., Archer M. A., Beckman K. A., Chippindale A. K., Nusbaum T. J. and Rose M. R. 2003 Breakdown in correlations during laboratory evolution. I. Comparative analyses ofDrosophila populations.Evolution 57, 527–535.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Prasad N. G. and Joshi A. 2003 What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies onDrosophila melanogaster taught us?J. Genet. 82, 45–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Prasad N. G., Shakarad M., Gohil V. M., Sheeba V., Rajamani M. and Joshi A. 2000 Evolution of reduced pre-adult viability and larval growth rate in laboratory populations ofDrosophila melanogaster selected for shorter development time.Genet. Res. 76, 249–259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rose M. R., Vu L. N., Park S. U. and Graves J. L. 1992 Selection on stress resistance increases longevity inDrosophila melanogaster.Exp. Gerontol. 27, 241–250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Service P. M., Hutchinson E. W., MacKinley M. D. and Rose M. R. 1985 Resistance to environmental stress inDrosophila melanogaster selected for postponed senescence.Physiol. Zool. 58, 380–389.Google Scholar
  14. Ueno H., Fujiyama N., Yao I., Sato Y. and Katakura H. 2003 Genetic architecture for normal and novel host-plant use in two local populations of the herbivorous ladybird beetle,Epilachna pustulosa.J. Evol. Biol. 16, 883–895.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wilkinson G. S., Fowler K. and Partridge L. 1990 Resistance of genetic correlation structure to directional selection inDrosophila melanogaster.Evolution 44, 1990–2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. G. Prasad
    • 1
  • Mallikarjun N. Shakarad
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  2. 2.Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution Laboratory, Biology DepartmentPoornaprajna Institute of Scientific ResearchBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations