Advertisement

Practical Failure Analysis

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 83–88 | Cite as

A plausible strategy for modeling fatigue life variation

  • J. Raphael
Peer Rerieved Articles

Abstract

In this paper stochastic modeling is used to predict fatigue life uncertainty by simulating small variations in strain-life material constants. The Monte Carlo method,[1] using either known cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) for the material constants and/or postulated CDFs, provides the mechanism to generate a set of failure data. These data are analyzed, using ordinary statistical techniques, to develop the Weibull CDF for cycles to failure. It is seen that small variations (∼±15%) in values of the strain-life constants result in large variations (∼600%) in predicted fatigue life at moderate strain. The often-observed phenomenon that spread in fatigue data is greater at lower strain is also described by the stochastic model.

Keywords

fatigue life variation Monte Carlo simulation strain life analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    I. Elishakoff:Probabilistic Theory of Structures, 2nd ed., Dover Publications, Mineola, NY, 1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. Farahmand and F. Abdi:Probabilistic Fracture Toughness, Fatigue Crack Growth Estimation Resulting from Material Uncertainties, ASTM International Paper 11569,Symposium on Probabilistic Aspects of Life Prediction, ASTM, W. Conshohocken, PA, 2002.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    SAE Fatigue Design Handbook, 3rd ed., R.C. Rice, Ed., SAE International, Warrendale, PA, 1997.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.I. Stephens, A. Fatemi, R.O. Stephens, and H. Fuchs:Metal Fatigue in Engineering, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, 2001.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R.W. Langraf:Cyclic Deformation and Fatigue Behavior of Hardened Steels, Report 320, Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, University of Illinois, 1968.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    N.E. Dowling:Mechanical Behavior of Materials, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C.-C. Chu: “Fatigue Damage Calculation using the Critical Plane Approach,”J. Eng. Mater.— T.ASME, 1995,117, pp. 41–49.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Fatemi and D. Socie: “A Critical Plane Approach to Multiaxial Fatigue Damage Including Out-Of-Phase Loading,”Fatigue Fract. Eng. M., 1988,11(3).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Socie and G. Marquis:Multiaxial Fatigue, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 2000.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K.C. Kapur and L.R. Lamberson:Reliability in Engineering Design, John Wiley & Sons, 1977.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, and B.P. Flannery:Numerical Recipes in C, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.E. Shigley and C.R. Mischke:Mechanical Engineering Design, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill, 2002.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Fatemi and P. Kurath: “Multiaxial Fatigue Life Predictions Under the Influence of Mean-Stresses,”J. Eng. Mater. — T. ASME, 1987,110, pp. 380–388.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International - The Materials Information Society 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Raphael
    • 1
  1. 1.Columbus McKinnon CorporationAmherst

Personalised recommendations