Skip to main content
Log in

Λ-Λ interaction from6HeΛΛ

  • Lettere Alla Redazione
  • Published:
Il Nuovo Cimento B (1965-1970)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. D. J. Prowse:A 6HeΛΛ Double Hyperfragment (University of Wyoming, 1966), to be published;

  2. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc.,11, 358 (1966).

  3. M. Danysz, K. Garbowska, J. Pniewski, T. Pniewski, J. Zakrzewski, E. R. Fletcher, J. Lemonne, P. Renard, J. Sacton, W. T. Toner, D. O’Sullivan, T. P. Shah, A. Thompson, P. Allen, M. Heeran, A. Montwill, J. E. Allen, M. J. Beniston, D. H. Davis, D. A. Garbutt, V. A. Bull, R. C. Kumar andP. V. Match:Nucl. Phys.,49, 121 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Recently, there was another double hypernuclear event reported byJ. Lemonne, J. Sacton, G. Schorochoff, D. O’Sullivan, T. P. Shah, A. Thompson,Sr. M. Heeran, A. Montwill, R. O. Stanley, M. A. Shaukat, W. T. Toner, P. Allen, D. H. Davis, E. R. Fletcher, J. E. Allen, V. A. Bull, A. P. Conway, M. M. Kasim, P. V. March, K. Pniewska, T. Pniewski, M. F. Votruba, M. Suk, Z. Vintz, A. Filipkowski, J. Herynek, J. Piekarz andJ. Zakrzewski:Nuovo Cimento,41, 235 (1966). This event is, however, not useful for our purpose, since its identity could not be established.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. In a number of detailed calculations (ref. (5–8)), the identification as10BeΛΛ has always been assumed. This is perhaps not too serious, since, as pointed out by Dalitz (R. H. Dalitz:Phys. Lett.,5, 53 (1963)), the analysis of this event as11BeΛΛ would likely lead to a similar estimate for the Λ-Λ strength. Also, the analysis ofDanysz et al. showed that those interpretations in terms of litbium double hyperfragments appeared to be less likely.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. H. Dalitz andG. Rajasekaran:Nucl. Phys.,50, 450 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. C. Tang, R. C. Herndon andE. W. Schmid:Phys. Lett.,10, 358 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. C. Tang andR. C. Herndon:Phys. Rev.,138, B 637 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. R. Bodmer andS. Ali:Phys. Rev.,138, B 644 (1965).

  10. Y. C. Tang andR. C. Herndon:Phys. Rev. Lett.,14, 991 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. C. Mayeur, J. Sacton, P. Vilain, G. Wilquet, D. Stanley, P. Allen, D. H. Davis, E. R. Fletcher, D. A. Garbutt, M. A. Shaukat, J. E. Allen, V. A. Bull, A. P. Conway andP. V. March:Nuovo Cimento,43 B, 180 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R. C. Herndon, Y. C. Tang andE. W. Schmid:Phys. Rev.,187, B 294 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. C. Herndon andY. C. Tang: inMethods of Computational Physics (New York), vol. 6, to be published in 1966.

  14. Y. C. Tang, E. W. Schmid andR. C. Herndon:Nucl. Phys.,65, 203 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. The small difference between the α-A potential of this calculation (potentialA) and that of ref. (7) has been taken into consideration.

  16. Danysz et. al. gaveB ΛΛ=(17.5±0.5) MeV, which was based onB Λ for9BeΛ equal to 6.5 MeV. We have revised the value ofB ΛΛ, since the most recent experimental value ofB Λ for3BeΛ is (6.24±0.25) MeV (10).

  17. Similar conclusions should hold, if this double hypernucleus were11BeΛΛ.

  18. R. C. Herndon andY. C. Tang: to appear inPhys. Rev.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, Y.C., Herndon, R.C. Λ-Λ interaction from6HeΛΛ . Nuovo Cimento B (1965-1970) 46, 117–121 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02710641

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02710641

Keywords

Navigation