Abstract
The non-inductive galvanic disturbances due to surficial bodies, lying smaller than high frequency skin depth, cause serious interpretational errors in magnetotelluric data. These frequency independent distortions result in a quasi-static shift between the apparent resistivity curves known as static shift. Two-dimensional modelling studies, for the effects of surficial bodies on magnetotelluric interpretation, show that the transverse electric (TE) mode apparent resistivity curves are hardly affected compared to the transverse magnetic (TM) mode curves, facilitating the correction by using a curve shifting method to match low frequency asymptotes. But in the case of field data the problem is rather complicated because of the random distribution of geometry and conductivity of near surface inhomogeneities. Here we present the use of deep resistivity sounding (DRS) data to constrain MT static shift. Direct current sensitivity studies show that the behaviour of MT static shift can be estimated using DC resistivity measurements close to the MT sounding station to appreciable depths. The distorted data set is corrected using the MT response for DRS model and further subject to joint inversion with DRS data. Joint inversion leads to better estimation of MT parameters compared to the separate inversion of data sets.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almeida E, Jaume Pous, Santos F M, Fonseca P, Marcuello A, Queralt P, Nolasco R and Victor L M. 2001 Electromagnetic imaging of a transpressional tectonics in SW Iberia;Geophys. Res. Letters 28 439–442
Berdichevsky M N and Dmitriev V I 1976 Distortion of magnetic and electric fields by near surface lateral inhomogeneities;Acta Grodaet. Geophys. Et Mantanist. Acad. Sci. Hung. 11 217–221
Brasse H and Rath V 1997 Audiomagnetotelluric investigations of shallow sedimentary basins in northern Sudan;Geophys. J. Int. 128 301–314
Cagniard L 1953 Basic theory of the magnetotelluric method of geophysical prospecting;Geophysics 18 605–635
Demidova T A, Yegorov I V and Yanikyan V O 1985 Galvanic distortions of the magnetotelluric field of the lower Caucasus;Geomagnetic Aeron. 25 391–396
Gokarn S G, Rao C K, Gautham Gupta and Singh B P 1999 Magnetotelluric techniques; In:Deep Continental Studies in India, DST Newsletter 9(1) 2–8
Haak V, Stoll J and Winter H 1991 Why is the electrical resistivity around the KTB hole so low?;Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 66 12–33
Harinarayana T 1993 Application of joint inversion technique to deep resistivity and magnetotelluric sounding data in Northumberland Basin, Northern England;Geol. Soc. India Mem. 24 113–120
Harinarayana T 1999 Combination of EM and DC measurements for upper crustal studies;Surv. Geophys. 20 257–278
Harinarayana T, Naganjaneyulu K, Manoj C, Patro B P K, Begum S K, Murthy D N, Rao M, Kumaraswamy V T C and Virupakshi G. 2002 Magnetotelluric investigations along Kuppam-Palani Geotransect, south India-2D modeling results;Mem. Geol. Soc. India (in press)
Hyndman R Det al 1993 The origin of electrically conductive lower continental crust: Saline water or graphite?;Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 81 325–344
Jones A G 1988 Static shift of magnetotelluric data and its removal in a sedimentary basin environment;Geophysics 53 967–978
Jones A G 1992 Electrical conductivity of the continental lower crust; In:Continental lower crust (ed) D M Fountain, R J Arculus and R W Kay (Amsterdam: Elsevier) 81–143
Jupp D L B and Vozoff K 1975 Stable iterative methods for the inversion of geophysical data;Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 42 957–976
Orange A S 1989 Magnetotelluric exploration for Hydrocarbons;Proc. of the IEEE 77 287–317
Park S K, Orange A S and Madden T R 1983 Effects of three dimensional structure on magnetotelluric sounding curves;Geophysics 48 1402–1405
Park S K 1985 Distortion of magnetotelluric sounding curves by three dimensional structures;Geophysics 50 786–797
Pellerin L and Hohmann G W 1990a Transient electromagnetic inversion: A remedy for magnetotelluric static shifts;Geophysics 55 1242–1250
Pellerin L and Hohmann G 1990b Remedy for static shift;Geophysics 56 951–960
Romo J M, Flores C, Vega R, Vazquez R, Perez Flores M A, Gomez-Trevino E, Esparza F Z, Quizano J E and Garcia V H 1997 A closely spaced magnetotelluric study of the Ahuachapan-Chipilapa geothermal fields, El Salvador;Geothermics 26 627–656
Simpson F L, Haak V, Khan M A, Sakkas V and Meju M 1997 The KRISP-94 magnetotelluric survey of early 1995: first results;Tectonophysics 278 261–271
Spitzer K 2001 Magnetotelluric static shift and direct current sensitivity;Geophys. J. Int. 144 289–299
Sternberg B K, Washburne J C and Pellerin L 1988 Correction for the static shift in magnetotellurics using transient electromagnetic soundings;Geophysics 53 1459–1468
Tikhonov A 1950 On determining electrical characteristics of the deep layers of the earth’s crust;Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 73 295–297
Wannamaker P E, Hohmann G W and Ward S H 1984 Magnetotelluric responses of three-dimensional bodies in layered earths;Geophysics 49 1517–1533
Wannamaker P E, Stodt J A and Rijo L A 1987 Stable finite element solution for two-dimensional magnetotelluric modelling;Geophys. J. Astr. Soc. 88 277–296
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stephen, J., Gokarn, S.G., Manoj, C. et al. Effects of galvanic distortions on magnetotelluric data: Interpretation and its correction using deep electrical data. J Earth Syst Sci 112, 27–36 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02710041
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02710041