Abstract
We compiled available news and internet accounts of damage and other effects from the 26th January, 2001, Bhuj earthquake, and interpreted them to obtain modified Mercalli intensities at over 200 locations throughout the Indian subcontinent. These values are used to map the intensity distribution using a simple mathematical interpolation method. The maps reveal several interesting features. Within the Kachchh region, the most heavily damaged villages are concentrated towards the western edge of the inferred fault, consistent with western directivity. Significant sedimentinduced amplification is also suggested at a number of locations around the Gulf of Kachchh to the south of the epicenter. Away from the Kachchh region intensities were clearly amplified significantly in areas that are along rivers, within deltas, or on coastal alluvium such as mud flats and salt pans. In addition we use fault rupture parameters inferred from teleseismic data to predict shaking intensity at distances of 0–1000 km. We then convert the predicted hard rock ground motion parameters to MMI using a relationship (derived from internet-based intensity surveys) that assigns MMI based on the average effects in a region. The predicted MMIs are typically lower by 1–2 units than those estimated from news accounts. This discrepancy is generally consistent with the expected effect of sediment response, but it could also reflect other factors such as a tendency for media accounts to focus on the most dramatic damage, rather than the average effects. Our modeling results also suggest, however, that the Bhuj earthquake generated more high-frequency shaking than is expected for earthquakes of similar magnitude in California, and may therefore have been especially damaging.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ambraseys N and Bilham R 2000 A note on the KangraM s = 7.8 earthquake of 4 April 1905;Current Science 79 101–106
Atkinson G M 2001 Linking historical intensity observations with ground motion relations for eastern north America;Seism. Res. Lett. (submitted)
Atkinson G and Sonley E 2000 Empirical relationships between modified Mercalli intensity and response spectra;Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 90 537–544
Baker W E 1846 Remarks on the Allah Bund and on the drainage of the eastern part of the Sind basin;Trans. Bombay Geogr. Soc. 7 186–188
Bendick R, Bilham R, Fielding E, Gaur V K, Hough S E, Kier G, Kulkarni M N, Martin S, Mueller K and Mukul M 2001 The January 26, 2001 Bhuj, India earthquake;Seismol. Res. Lett. 72 328–335
Beresnev I A and Atkinson G M 1997 Generic finite-fault model for ground-motion prediction in eastern North America;Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 89 608–625
Beresnev I A and Atkinson G M 2001 Source parameters of earthquakes in eastern and western North America based on finite-fault modeling;Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. (submitted)
Bilham R 1998 Slip parameters for the Rann of Kachchh, India, 16 June 1819, earthquake, quantified from contemporary accounts; In:Coastal Tectonics, (eds) I S Stewart and C Vita-Finzi (London: Geological Society)146 295–318
Chen W P and Molnar P 1983 Focal depths of intracontinental and intraplate earthquakes and their implications for the thermal and mechanical properties of the lithosphere;J. Geophys. Res. 88 4183–4214
Greig G and Atkinson G 1993 Damage potential of eastern North American earthquakes;Seism. Res. Lett. 64 119–137
Hanks T C and Johnston A 1992 Common features of the excitation and propagation of strong ground motion for North-American earthquakes;Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 82 1–23
Hough S E, Armbruster J G, Seeber L and Hough J F 2000 On the modified mercalli intensities and magnitudes of the 1811–1812 New Madrid, Central United States earthquakes;J. Geophys. Res. 105 23, 869–83, 864
Horton S, Bodin P Johnston A, Withers M, Chiu C, Raphael A, Rabak I, Maio Q, Smalley R, Chiu J and Langston C 2001 Source characteristics of aftershocks of the India Republic Day earthquake (abstract);Trans. Am. Geophys. U. 82
Johnston A C and Kanter L R 1992 Stable continental earthquakes;Sci. Am. 262 68–75
Kennett B L N 1989 Lg-wave propagation in heterogeneous media;Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 79 860–872
Oldham T 1883 Catalog of Indian earthquakes;Mem. Geol. Surv. India. 19 163–215 (Calcutta: Geol. Surv. India)
Oldham R D 1926 The Cutch (Kachh) Earthquake of 16th June, 1819 with a revision of the great earthquake; of 12th June, 1897;Mem. Geol. Surv. India 46 71–146
Rajendran C P and Rajendran K 2001 Character of deformation and past seismicity associated with the 1819 Kutch earthquake, northwestern India;Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. (in press)
Richter C F 1958Elementary Seismology, (New York: W.H. Freeman)
Singh S K, Ordaz M, Dattatrayam R S and Gupta H K 1999 A spectral analysis of the 21 May 1997, Jabalpur, India, earthquake (M w = 5.8) and estimation of ground motion from future earthquakes in the Indian shield region,Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 89 1620–1630
Stover C W and Coffman J L 1993 Seismicity of the United States, 1568–1989 (revised);U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 1527
Tuttle M, Johnston A, Patterson G, Tucker K, Rajendran C P, Rajendran K, Thakkar M and Schweig E 2001a Liquefaction induced by the 2001 Republic Day Earthquake, India;Seism. Res. Lett. 72 p397
Tuttle M, Hengesh J V and Lettis W R 2001b Observations and comparisons of liquefaction features and related effects induced by the Bhuj Earthquake;Earthq. Spectra (submitted)
Wald D J, Quitoriano V, Heaton T H and Kanamori H 1999 Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and modified Mercalli intensity in California;Earthq. Spectra,15 557–564
Wessel P and Smith W H F 1991 Free software helps map and display data;Eos Trans. AGU 72 441, 445
Yagi and Kikuchihttp://wwweic.eri.u-tokyo.ac.jp/yuji/ southindia/index.html 2001
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hough, S.E., Martin, S., Bilham, R. et al. A media-based assessment of damage and ground motions from the january 26th, 2001M 7.6 Bhuj, India earthquake. J Earth Syst Sci 112, 353–373 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02709262
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02709262