Skip to main content
Log in

Flexure of the Indian plate and intraplate earthquakes

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The flexural bulge in central India resulting from India's collision with Tibet has a wavelength of approximately 670 km. It is manifest topographically and in the free-air gravity anomaly and the geoid. Calculations of the stress distribution within a flexed Indian plate reveal spatial variations throughout the depth of the plate and also a function of distance from the Himalaya. The wavelength (and therefore local gradient) of stress variation is a function of the effective elastic thickness of the plate, estimates of which have been proposed to lie in the range 40–120 km. The imposition of this stress field on the northward moving Indian plate appears fundamental to explaining the current distribution of intraplate earthquakes and their mechanisms. The current study highlights an outer trough south of the flexural bulge in central India where surface stresses are double the contiguous compressional stresses to the north and south. The Bhuj, Latur and Koyna earthquakes and numerous other recent reverse faulting events occurred in this compressional setting. The N/S spatial gradient of stress exceeds 2 bars/km near the flexural bulge. The overall flexural stress distribution provides a physical basis for earthquake hazard mapping and suggests that areas of central India where no historic earthquakes are recorded may yet be the locus of future damaging events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bendick R and Bilham R 2001 Search for buckling of the southwest Indian coast related to Himalayan collision. In: Himalaya and Tibet: mountain roots to mountain tops, (ed) A Macfarlane, R Sorkhabi, and J Quade;Geological Society of America Special Paper 328 pp 313-323

  • Bendick R and Bilham R 2001 How perfect is the Himalayan Arc?Geology 29 791–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R 1988 Earthquakes and urban growth;Nature 336 625–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R and Gaur V K 2000 Geodetic contributions to the study of seismotectonics in India;Curr. Sci. 79 9 1259–1269

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R and England P 2001 Plateau pop-up during the great 1897 Assam earthquake;Nature 410 806–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R, Larson K, Freymueller J and Project Idylhim members 1997 GPS measurements of present-day convergence across the Nepal Himalaya;Nature (London) 386 61–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrard S G 1901 The attraction of the Himalaya mountains upon the plumb-line in India;Survey of India Professional Paper 5 Dehra Dun, pp 115

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrard S G 1912 On the origin of the Himalaya mountains;Survey of India Professional Paper 12 Calcutta, pp 26

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W-P and Kao H 1996 Seismotectonics of Asia: some recent progress, in the tectonic evolution of Asia, (ed) An Yin and T M Harrison; Cambridge Universiy Press, 37–54

  • Cowie H McC 1921 A criticism of Mr. R. D. Oldham's memoir “the structure of the Himalayas and of the Gangetic Plain as elucidated by geodetic observations in India”;Survey of India Professional Paper 18 Dehra Dun, pp 33

    Google Scholar 

  • Dmowska R, Zheng G and Rice J R 1996 Seismicity and deformation at convergent margins due to heterogeneous coupling;J. Geophys. Res. 101 3015–3029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl R, van der Hilst R and Buland R 1997 Global teleseismic earthquake relocation with improved travel times and procedures for depth determination;Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 88 722–743

    Google Scholar 

  • Glennie E A 1931 Gravity;Survey of India Geodetic Report,VI 52–64, Dehra Dun

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudie A 1995 The changing earth, rates of geomorphological Processes (Blackwell) pp 302

  • Gowd T N, Srirama Rao S V and Gaur V K 1992 Tectonic stress field in the Indian subcontinent;J. Geophys. Res. 97 (B8), 11879–11888

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson J 2002 Strength of the continental lithosphere: time to abandon the jelly sandwich?;GSA Today 12 (9) 4–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain S C, Nair K K K and Yedekar D B 1995 Geology of the Son-Narmada-Tapti Lineament Zone in Central India. In: Project Crumansonata: Geoscientific Studies of the Son-Narmada-Tapti Lineament Zone;Geol. Surv. India, Sp. Pub. 10 1–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Karner G D and Watts A B 1983 Gravity anomalies and flexure of the lithosphere at mountain ranges;J. Geophys. Res. 88 10449–10477

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenner S J 2001 How faults are loaded: the influence of tectonic environment; American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting, EOS Fall Meeting Supplemental,82 F942 December 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • King G C P and Bilham R G 1973 Strain measurement instrumentation and technique; Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London,A274 209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon-Caen H and Molnar P 1985 Gravity anomalies, flexure of the Indian plate, and the structure, support and evolution of the Himalaya and Ganga basin;Tectonics 4 513–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon-Caen H and Molnar P 1983 Constraints on the structure of the Himalaya from an analysis of gravity anomalies and a flexural model of the lithosphere;J. Geophys. Res. 88 8171–8191

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggi A, Jackson J A, McKenzie D and Priestley K 2000 Earthquake focal depths, effective elastic thickness, and strength of the continental lithosphere;Geology 28 495–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maggi A, Jackson J A, Priestley K, Baker C 2000 A reassessment of focal depth distributions in southern Iran, the Tien Shanand northern India: Do earthquakes really occur in the continental mantle?Geophys. J. Int. 143 629–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie D and Fairhead D 1997 Estimates of the effective elastic thickness of the continental lithosphere from Bouguer and free-air gravity anomalies;J. Geophys. Res. 102 27523–27552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melosh H J 1978 Dynamic support of the outer rise;Geophys. Res. Lett. 5 321–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Melosh and Raefsky 1908 The dynamical origin of subduction zone topography;Geophys. J. R. Ast. Soc. 60 333–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnar P, Chen W-P, Fitch T J, Tapponier P, Warsi W E K and Wu F T 1977 Structure and tectonics of the Himalaya: a brief summary of relevant geophysical observations. In:Himalaya: Sciences de la Terre. pp 269–294. Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnar P and Chen W-P 1983 Focal depths and fault plane solutions of earthquakes under the Tibetan plateau;J. Geophys. Res. 88 1180–1196

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham R D 1917 The structure of the Himalayas and of the Gangetic Plain, as elucidated by geodetic observations in India;Mem. Geol. Survey of India XLII(2) Calcutta

  • Parsons B and Molnar P 1976 The origin of the outer topographic rises associated with trenches;Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc. 45 pp 707

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul J, Burgmann R, Gaur V K, Bilham R, Larson K M, Ananda M B, Jade S, Mukul M, Anupama T S, Satyal G, Kumar D 2001 The motion and active deformation of India;Geophys. Res. Lett. 28 (4) 647–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp R H, Yan Ming Wang, Pavlis N K, Aug. 1991 The Ohio State 1991 Geopotential and sea surface topography harmonic coefficient models, Report No. 410, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, Columbus Ohio 43210-1247

    Google Scholar 

  • Sastri V V, Bhandari L L, Raju A T R and Datta A K 1971 Tectonic framework and subsurface strigraphy of the Ganga Basin;J. Geol. Soc. Ind. 12 222–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweig E, III, Gomberg J, Petersen M, Ellis M, Bodin P, Mayrose L and Rastogi B K 2003 The M 7.7 Bhuj earthquake: Global lessons for earthquake hazard in intraplate regions;J. Geol. Soc. India 61, 277–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeber L and Gornitz V 1983 River profiles along the Himalayan arc as indicators of active tectonics;Tectonophysics 92 335–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauder W 1968 Tensional character of earthquake Foci beneath the Aleutian trench with relation to sea floor spreading;J. Geophys. Res. 73 7693–7703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein S, Sella G and Okal E 2002 The January 26, 2001 Bhuj earthquake and the diffuse western boundary of the Indian plate, inPlate Boundary Zones (ed) S. Stein and J Freymueller; Geodynamics Series 30, AGU, Washington D C

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor M A J, Dmowska R and Rice J R 1998 Upper plate stressing and seismicity in the subduction earthquake cycle;J. Geophys. Res. 103 24523–24542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triep E G and Sykes L R 1997 Frequence of occurrence of moderate to great earthquakes in intracontinental regions;J. Geophys. Res. 102 9923–9948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turcotte D L and Schubert G 1983Geodynamics; Cambridge University Press

  • Wang Qi, Pei-Zhen Zhang, Freymueller J T, Bilham R, Larson K M, Xi'an Lai, You X, Niu Z, Wu J, Li Y, Liu J, Yang Z, Chen Q 2001 Present day crustal deformation in China constrained by global positioning measurements;Science 294 574–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warsi W E K and Molnar P 1977 Gravity anomalies and plate tectonics in the Himalaya. In:Himalaya: Sciences de la Terre. pp 463–473. Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts A B 2001Isostacy and flexure of the lithosphere pp 458 (Cambridge)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bilham, R., Bendick, R. & Wallace, K. Flexure of the Indian plate and intraplate earthquakes. J Earth Syst Sci 112, 315–329 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02709259

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02709259

Keywords

Navigation