Skip to main content
Log in

Internalisation as a general theory of foreign direct investment: A critique

  • Bemerkungen
  • Published:
Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

The theory of internalisation does provide an explanation of certain types of FDI activities by MNEs. In particular, there are three areas where internalisation appears to provide an explanation of FDI as a specific form of international involvement by the MNE: these entail vertical integration, transfer pricing and quality control [Buckley, Casson, 1976; Casson, 1983].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buckley, Peter J., Mark C. Casson,The Future of the Multinational Enterprise. London 1976.

  • Calvet, Agustin L.,“Synthesis of Foreign Direct Investment Theories and Theories of the Multinational Firm”.Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 12, 1981, pp. 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casson, Mark C.,Alternatives to the Multinational Enterprise. London 1979.

  • -,“The Conceptual Framework”. In: Mark C. Casson (Ed.),The Growth of International Business. London 1983, pp. 1–33.

  • Dunning, John H.,“The Determinants of International Production”.Oxford Economic Papers, N.S., Vol. 25, 1973, pp. 289–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus, John,“The Theory of the International Firm”. In: Gilles Paquet (Ed.),The Multinational Firm and the Nation State. Toronto 1972, pp. 66–93.

  • Parry, Thomas G.,“Trade and Non-Trade Performance of U.S. Manufacturing Industry:“Revealed” Comparative Advantage”.The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, Vol. 42, 1974, pp. 158–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • -,New Forms of International Involvement: Australian Companies in the Asia-Pacific Region. Paper Presented to the OECD Development Centre Conference on“New Forms of Involvement”. Paris, June 1984.

  • Rugman, Alan M.,“Internalization as a General Theory of Foreign Direct Investment: A Re-Appraisal of the Literature”.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 116, 1980, pp. 365–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -,Inside the Multinationals: The Economics of Internal Markets. London 1981.

  • -(Ed.),New Theories of the Multinational Enterprise. London 1982.

  • Stopford, John M., Louis T. Wells,Managing the Multinational Enterprise: Organization of the Firm and Ownership of the Subsidiaries. New York 1972.

  • Teece, David J.,“The Multinational Enterprise: Market Failure and Market Power Considerations”.Sloan Management Review, Vol. 22, 1981, pp. 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • -, “Technological and Organisational Factors in the Theory of the Multinational Enterprise”. In: Mark C. Casson (Ed.),The Growth of International Business. London 1983, pp. 51–62.

Download references

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Parry, T.G. Internalisation as a general theory of foreign direct investment: A critique. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 121, 564–569 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02708193

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02708193

Keywords

Navigation