Skip to main content
Log in

New classical and austrian business cycle theory: Is there a difference?

  • Literatur — Literature
  • Published:
Review of World Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

To compare new classical and Austrian theory seems legitimate only with respect to a particular aspect of economic reality, namely business cycles. In the past century, Austrians have covered so many fields of economic theory that the achievements of new classicals are comparatively small. The discussions of both approaches showed that it would not be appropriate to claim that Austrians have developed theonly theory of business cycles which refers to individual behavior and choice. New classicals have rediscovered this approach and used many of the tenets for their explanation. This is not to say that new classical theory completely follows Austrian traditions. But many of the differences appear to be small or are only semantic in character.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barro, Robert J., “Rational Expectations and the Role of Monetary Policy”.Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 2, 1976, pp. 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -,Money, Expectations and Business Cycles. New York 1981.

  • -,Macroeconomics. New York 1984.

  • Brunner, Karl, Alex Cukierman, Allan H. Meltzer, “Stagflation, Persistent Unemployment and the Permanence of Economic Shocks”.Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 6, 1980, pp. 467–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, “Money and Economic Activity, Inventories and Business Cycles”.Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 11, 1983, pp. 281–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cukierman, Alex, “Relative Price Variability, Inflation and the Allocative Efficiency of the Price System”.Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 9, 1982, pp. 131–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, Edwin G., “Austrian Economics as an Extraordinary Science”. In: Edwin G. Dolan (Ed.),The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics. Kansas City 1976, pp. 3–15.

  • Friedman, Milton, “The Role of Monetary Policy”.The American Economic Review, Vol. 58, 1968, pp. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Nobel Lecture: Inflation and Unemployment”.Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 85, 1977, pp. 451–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, Roger W., “Austrian Macroeconomics: A Diagrammatical Exposition”. In: Louis M. Spadaro (Ed.),New Directions in Austrian Economics. Kansas City 1978, pp. 167–204.

  • von Hayek, Friedrich A.,Monetary Theory and the Trade Cycle. London 1933.

  • -,Prices and Production. 2nd, revised and enlarged edition. London 1935.

  • —, “The Use of Knowledge in Society”.The American Economic Review, Vol. 35, 1945, pp. 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • -,Der Wettbewerb als Entdeckungsverfahren. Kieler VortrÄge, N.F., 56, Tübingen 1968.

  • -,Full Employment at Any Price? London 1975.

  • -, “Gradualism Unacceptable. Stop Inflation Quickly”.International Herald Tribune, Paris, February 19, 1980, p. 7.

  • -, “Can We Still Avoid Inflation?” In: Ludwig von Mises Institute for Austrian Economics (Ed.),The Austrian Theory of the Trade Cycle and Other Essays. Washington 1983, pp. 35–44.

  • Hoover, Kevin D., “Two Types of Monetarism”.Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 22, 1984, pp. 58–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, Israel M., “On the Method of Austrian Economics”. In: Edwin G. Dolan (Ed.),The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics. Kansas City 1976, pp. 40–51.

  • -, “The ‘Austrian’ Perspective on the Crisis”. In: Daniel Bell, Irving Kristol (Eds.),The Crisis in Economic Theory. New York 1981, pp. 111–122.

  • -, “Introduction”. In: Israel M. Kirzner (Ed.),Method, Process, and Austrian Economics. Lexington 1982, pp. 1–5.

  • Klamer, Arjo (Ed.),Conversations with Economists. Robert E. Lucas, Jr., pp. 22–57; Thomas J. Sargent, pp. 58–80. Totowa 1984.

  • Lachmann, Ludwig M. [1976a], “Toward a Critique of Macroenomics”. In: Edwin G. Dolan (Ed.),The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics. Kansas City 1976, pp. 152–159.

  • - [1976b], “On the Central Concept of Austrian Economics”. In: Edwin G. Dolan (Ed.),The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics. Kansas City 1976, pp. 126–132.

  • -, “An Austrian Stocktaking: Unsettled Questions and Tentative Answers”. In: Louis M. Spadaro (Ed.),New Directions in Austrian Economics. Kansas City 1978, pp. 1–18.

  • - [1984a], “Die Rolle der Erwartungen in der Nationalökonomie als Sozialwissenschaft.” In: Ludwig M. Lachmann,Marktproze\ und Erwartungen. München 1984, pp. 69–84.

  • - [1984b], “Ludwig von Mises und der Marktproze\”. In: Ludwig M. Lachmann,Markt-proze\ und Erwartungen. München 1984, pp. 174–189.

  • Laidler, David,Monetarist Perspectives. Southampton 1982.

  • Lucas, Robert E. Jr., “Expectations and the Neutrality of Money”.Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 4, 1972, pp. 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, “Some International Evidence on Output-Inflation Tradeoffs”.The American Economic Review, Vol. 63, 1973, pp. 326–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “An Equilibrium Model of the Business Cycle”.Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 83, 1975, pp. 1113–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -, “Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique”. In: Karl Brunner, Allan H. Meltzer (Eds.),The Phillips-Curve and Labor Markets. Amsterdam 1976, pp. 19–46.

  • -, “Understanding Business Cycles”. In: Karl Brunner, Allan H. Meltzer (Eds.),Stabilization of the Domestic and International Economy. Amsterdam 1977, pp. 7–29.

  • —, “Unemployment Policy”.The American Economic Review, Vol. 68, 1978, pp. 353–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • — [1980a], “Methods and Problems in Business Cycle Theory”.Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 12, 1980, pp. 696–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • - [1980b], “Rules, Discretion, and the Role of the Economic Advisor”. In: Stanley Fischer (Ed.),Rational Expectations and Economic Policy. Chicago 1980, pp. 199–210.

  • -,Studies in Business Cycle Theory. Oxford 1981.

  • -,Thomas J. Sargent, “After Keynesian Macroeconomics”. In: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Ed.),After the Phillips-Curve: Persistence of High Inflation and High Unemployment. Boston 1978, pp. 49–72.

  • Machlup, Fritz, “The Rationality of ‘Rational Expectations’ “.Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 16, 1983, pp. 172–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Mises, Ludwig,Human Action. New Haven 1949.

  • -, “The ‘Austrian’ Theory of the Trade Cycle”. In: Ludwig von Mises Institute for Austrian Economics (Ed.),The Austrian Theory of the Trade Cycle and Other Essays. Washington 1983, pp. 1–6.

  • Muth, John F., “Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements”.Econometrica, Vol. 29, 1961, pp. 315–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Driscoll, Gerald P. Jr., “Rational Expectations, Politics, and Stagflation”. In: Mario I. Rizzo (Ed.),Time, Uncertainty, and Disequilibrium. Lexington 1979, pp. 153–176.

  • -,Sudha R. Shenoy, “Inflation, Recession and Stagflation”.. In: Edwin G. Dolan (Ed.),The Foundations of Modem Austrian Economics. Kansas City 1976, pp. 185–211.

  • Paqué, Karl-Heinz, “How Far is Vienna from Chicago?”.Kyklos, Vol. 38, 1985, pp. 412–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard, Murray N. [1976a], “The Austrian Theory of Money”. In: Edwin G. Dolan (Ed.),The foundations of Modern Austrian Economics. Kansas City 1976, pp. 160–184.

  • - [1976b], “Praxeology: The Methodology of Austrian Economics”. In: Edwin G. Dolan (Ed.),The Foundations of Modem Austrian Economics. Kansas City 1976, pp. 19–39.

  • -, “Economic Depressions: Their Cause and Cure”. In: Ludwig von Mises Institute for Austrian Economics (Ed.),The Austrian Theory of the Trade Cycle and Other Essays. Washington 1983, pp. 21–34.

  • Sargent, Thomas J. [1983a], “The Ends of Four Big Inflations”. In: Robert E. Hall (Ed.),Inflation. Chicago 1983, pp. 41–97.

  • - [1983b], “Stopping Moderate Inflations: The Methods of Poincaré and Thatcher”. In: Rudiger Dornbusch, Mario Henrique Simonsen (Eds.),Inflation, Debt and Indexation. London 1983, pp. 54–96.

  • Sargent, Thomas J., Neil Wallace, “Rational Expectations and the Theory of Economic Policy”.Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 2, 1976, pp. 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheide, Joachim,Geldpolitik, Konjunktur und rationale Erwartungen. Kieler Studien, 188, Tübingen 1984.

  • Tobin, James, “Are New Classical Models Plausible Enough to Guide Policy?”Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 12, 1980, pp. 788–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarnowitz, Victor, “Recent Work on Business Cycles in Historical Perspective: A Review of Theories and Evidence”.Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 23, 1985, pp. 523–580.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Scheide, J. New classical and austrian business cycle theory: Is there a difference?. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 122, 575–598 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707381

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707381

Keywords

Navigation