Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv

, Volume 138, Issue 1, pp 83–96 | Cite as

How international outsourcing drives up Eastern European wages

  • Hartmut Egger
  • Peter Egger
Articles

Abstract

How International Outsourcing Drives Up Eastern European Wages. — This paper analyzes the effects of intermediate goods trade on the development of real wages in Central and Eastern European manufacturing. The empirical findings show that world exports in intermediate goods of the CEEC exhibit a negative impact on wages, and imports a positive one. Since 1993, intermediate goods trade between the EU and the CEEC accounted for an increase in wages being most pronounced in Slovakia, Poland and the Czech Republic.

C33 F14 F15 F16 F40 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abraham, F., and J. Konings (1999). Does the Opening of Central and Eastern Europe Threaten Employment in the West?World Economy 22 (4): 585–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arndt, S. W. (1997a). Globalization and the Open Economy. North AmericanJournal of Economics and Finance 8(1): 70–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arndt, S. W. (1997b). Super-Specialization and the Gains from Trade. The Lowe Institute of Political Economy, Claremont McKenna College, mimeo.Google Scholar
  4. Arndt, S. W. (1999) Globalization and Economic Development.The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 8 (3): 309–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baltagi, B. H. (1995).Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Baltagi, B., and S. Khanti-Akom (1990). On Efficient Estimation with Panel Data: An Empirical Comparison of Instrumental Variables Estimators.Journal of Applied Econometrics 5 (4): 401–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowden, R. J., and D. A. Turkington (1984).Instrumental Variables. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Davidson, R., and J. G. MacKinnon (1993).Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Deardorff, A. V. (1998). Fragmentation in Simple Trade Models. Working Paper 422. Department of Economics, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  10. Deardorff, A. V. (2001). Fragmentation across Cones. In S. W. Arndt and H. Kierzkowski (ed.),Fragmentation: New Production Patterns in the World Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Egger H., and P. Egger (2000). Outsourcing and Skill-Specific Employment in a Small Economy: Austria and the Fall of the Iron Curtain. Discussion Paper 0024. Volkswirtschaftliche FakulÄt, University of Linz.Google Scholar
  12. Egger H., and P. Egger (2001) Cross Border Outsourcing: A General Equilibrium Perspective and Evidence for Outward Processing in EU Manufacturing. WIFO Working Paper 139. Austrian Institute of Economic Research. Vienna.Google Scholar
  13. Egger, H., and J. Falkinger (2001). A Complete Characterization of the Distributional Effects of International Outsourcing in the Heckscher-Ohlin Model. Munich University, CESIFO WPS 573.Google Scholar
  14. Feenstra, R. (1998). Integration of Trade and Disintegration of Production in the Global Economy.Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (4): 31–50.Google Scholar
  15. Feenstra, R., and G. Hanson (1996a). Foreign Investment, Outsourcing, and Relative Wages. In R. Feenstra, G. M. Grossman, and D. A. Irwin (ed.),Political Economy of Trade Policy: Essays in Honor of Jagdish Bhagwati. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Feenstra, R., and G. Hanson (1996b). Globalization, Outsourcing and Wage Inequality.American Economic Review 86 (2): 240–245.Google Scholar
  17. Feenstra, R., and G. Hanson (1997). Foreign Direct Investment and Relative Wages: Evidence from Mexico’sMaquiladoras.Journal of International Economics 42 (3/4): 371–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fontagné, L., M. Freudenberg, and D. ünal-Kesenci (1996).Statistical Analysis of EC Trade in Intermediate Products. Paris: EUROSTAT.Google Scholar
  19. Jones, R. W., and H. Kierzkowski (1997). Globalization and the Consequences of International Fragmentation. In R. Dornbusch, G. Calvo and M. Obstfeld (ed.),The Festschrift in Honor of Robert A. Mundell. Cambridge: MIT Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  20. Kohler, W. (2000). Fragmentation: A Theoretical Treatment. University of Linz, mimeo.Google Scholar
  21. Kohler, W. (2001). A Specific-Factors View on Outsourcing.North American Journal of Economics and Finance 12 (1): 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Konings, J., and H. Vandenbussche (1995). The Effect of Foreign Competition on U.K. Employment and Wages: Evidence from Firm-Level Panel Data.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 131 (4): 655–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Myant, M., and S. Smith (1999). Czech Trade Unions in Comparative Perspective.European Journal of Industrial Relations 5 (3): 265–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pollert, A. (1999). Trade Unionism in Transition in Central and Eastern Europe.European Journal of Industrial Relations 5 (2): 209–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institut fur Weltwirtschaft an der Universitat Kiel 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hartmut Egger
  • Peter Egger

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations