Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating the size of the potential market for the Kyoto flexibility mechanisms

  • Articles
  • Published:
Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Estimating the Size of the Potential Market for the Kyoto Flexibility Mechanisms. — The Kyoto Protocol incorporates three flexibility mechanisms to help Annex I countries to meet their Kyoto targets at a lower overall cost. This paper aims to estimate the size of the potential market for all three mechanisms over the first commitment period. Based on the national communications from 35 Annex I countries, it first estimates the potential demand in the greenhouse gas offset market. Then, it assesses the implications of the EU proposal for ceilings on the use of flexibility mechanisms. Finally, using the model based on the marginal abatement costs of 12 regions, the paper estimates the contributions of flexibility mechanisms to meet the total emissions reductions required of Annex I countries under the four trading scenarios.

Zusammenfassung

GeschÄtzter Umfang des potentiellen Marktes für die Kyoto-FlexibilitÄtsma\nahmen. — Das Kyoto-Protokoll enthÄlt drei FlexibilitÄtsmechanismen, die es den im Anhang I genannten LÄndern erlauben sollen, die Kyoto-Ziele zu niedrigeren Gesamtkosten zu realisieren. Der Artikel will den Umfang des potentiellen Marktes für alle drei Mechanismen über die erste Verpflichtungsperiode schÄtzen. Gestützt auf die nationalen Verlautbarungen von 35 LÄndern schÄtzt der Autor als Erstes die potentielle Nachfrage auf dem Markt für Ma\nahmen, mit denen die Diskrepanz zwischen wahrscheinlicher und angestrebter Treibhausgasmenge aufgefangen werden soll. Dann wird ermittelt, welche Implikationen sich aus dem EU-Vorschlag über eine Obergrenze beim Einsatz von FlexibilitÄtsma\nahmen ergeben. Schlie\lich wird im Rahmen von vier Handelsszenarien abgeschÄtzt, welchen Beitrag die FlexibilitÄtsma\nahmen liefern, wenn es darum geht, dass Anhang-I-LÄnder die gesamten Emissionen reduzieren. Dabei wird ein Modell benutzt, dem die Grenzkosten der Emissionsvermeidung in 12 Regionen zugrunde liegen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, D., P. Faeth, R. S. da Motta, C. E. F. Young, C. Ferraz, J. Zou, J. Li, M. Pathak, and L. Srivastava (1998). Opportunities for Financing Sustainable Development via the CDM: A Discussion Draft. Presented at a Side Event of the Fourth Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC, 7 November, Buenos Aires.

  • Böhringer, C. (1999). Cooling Down Hot Air: A Global CGE Analysis of Post-Kyoto Carbon Abatement Strategies. Presented at the International Conference on Flexible Mechanisms for an Efficient Climate Policy, 27–28 July, Stuttgart.

  • Brooke, A., D. Kendrick, and A. Meeraus (1996).GAMS Release 2.25: A User’s Guide. Washington, DC: GAMS Development Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (1999). Preparing for Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: Commission Communications to the Council and the Parliament. COM (1999) 230, Brussels.

  • Edmonds, J., C. MacCracken, R. Sands, and S. Kim (1998). Unfinished Business: The Economics of the Kyoto Protocol. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy.

  • EIA (Energy Information Administration) (1999). International Energy Outlook 1999. DOE/EIA-0484(99), Washington, DC.

  • Ellerman, A. D., and A. Decaux (1998). Analysis of Post-Kyoto CO2 Emissions Trading Using Marginal Abatement Curves. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report 40. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (1999). Community Strategy on Climate Change: Council Conclusions. No. 8346/99, 18 May, Brussels.

  • Gielen, A., and C. Koopmans (1998). The Economic Consequences of Kyoto. CPB Report No. 1. The Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (CPB), The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haites, E. (1998). Estimate of the Potential Market for Cooperative Mechanisms 2010. Unpublished Manuscript, Margaree Consultants Inc., Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (1998).World Energy Outlook 1998. Paris: International Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (1996).Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, M. (1997). Potential Climate Change: Carbon Dioxide Emissions 1990–96.World Energy Council Journal: 76-82.

  • McKibbin, W. J., M. T. Ross, R. Shackleton, and P. J. Wilcoxen (1999). Emissions Trading, Capital Flows and the Kyoto Protocol. Presented at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Working Group III Expert Meeting on the Economic Impacts of Annex I Mitigation Policies on non-Annex I Countries, 27–28 May, The Hague.

  • OECD (1999). Taking Action against Climate Change: The Kyoto Protocol. ECO/ CPE/WPl(99)/6. Paris.

  • Tulpulé, V., S. Brown, J. Lim, C. Polidan, H. Pant, and B. S. Fisher (1998). An Economic Assessment of the Kyoto Protocol Using the Global Trade and Environment Model. Presented at the OECD Workshop on the Economic Modelling of Climate Change, 17–18 September, Paris.

  • UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) (1996). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Second Session, Held at Geneva from 8 to 19 July 1996: Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties on its Second Session. FCCC/CP/1996/15/Add.l, Bonn.

  • - (1997a). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). FCCC/CP/1997/L.7/Add.l, Bonn.

  • - (1997b). Summary of the Report of the In-Depth Review of the National Communication of Russian Federation. FCCC/IDR.1(SUM)/RUS, Bonn.

  • - (1998 a). National Communications from Parties Included in Annex I to the Convention: Second Compilation and Synthesis of Second National Communications. FCCC/CP/1998/1 l/Add.2, Bonn.

  • - (1998b). Review of the Implementation of Commitments and of other Provisions of the Convention. Activities Implemented Jointly: Review of Progress under the Pilot Phase (Decision 5/CP.l), Second Synthesis Report on Activities Implemented. FCCC/CP/1998/2, Bonn.

  • - (1999). National Communications from Parties Included in Annex I to the Convention: Report on National Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Submissions from Annex I Parties for 1990 to 1996. FCCC/SBI/1999/5/Add.l, Bonn.

  • Van der Mensbrugghe, D. (1998). A (Preliminary) Analysis of the Kyoto Protocol: Using the OECD GREEN Model. Presented at the OECD Workshop on the Economic Modelling of Climate Change, 17–18 September, Paris.

  • Victor, D. G., N. Nakicenovic, and N. Victor (1998). The Kyoto Protocol Carbon Bubble: Implications for Russia, Ukraine and Emissions Trading. IR-98-094, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria.

  • Vrolijk, C. (1999). The Potential Size of the CDM.Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trader (UNCTAD) (6): 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z.X. (1999). Estimating the Size of the Potential Market for All Three Flexibility Mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol. Report prepared for the Asian Development Bank under Contract TA-5592-REG.

Download references

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Z. Estimating the size of the potential market for the Kyoto flexibility mechanisms. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 136, 491–521 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707291

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707291

Navigation