Skip to main content
Log in

Real exchange rates and unit root tests

  • Articles
  • Published:
Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Real Exchange Rates and Unit Root Tests. — This paper examines monthly OECD exchange rate data (1979–1997) using univariate and panel data unit root tests. Some of these tests support the hypothesis of a unit root. But tests of cointegration reveal the existence of weak purchasing power parity relationships between bilateral nominal exchange rates and relative prices. We suggest that researchers need not conduct unit root tests on real exchange rate data when a modified version of PPP is used; or if there is a long enough time series. Given the definition of real exchange rates, the indicator should be stationary and should have intrinsic mean reverting behaviour.

Zusammenfassung

Reale Wechselkurse und Tests auf Einheitswurzel. — Dieser Artikel untersucht monatliche OECD-Daten über Wechselkurse in den Jahren 1979–1997, wobei die Tests eindimensional sind und Paneldaten verwenden. Einige der Tests stützen die Hypothese der Einheitswurzel. Aber Kointegrationstests zeigen, dass nur schwache KaufkraftparitÄtenbeziehungen zwischen bilateralen nominalen Wechselkursen und relativen Preisen bestehen. Anderen Forschern wird vorgeschlagen, die realen Wechselkurse keinem Test zu unterwerfen, wenn eine modifizierte Version der KaufkraftparitÄtentheorie verwendet wird oder wenn die Zeitreihe lang genug ist. Bei gegebener Definition der realen Wechselkurse sollte der Indikator stationÄr sein und von sich aus zum Mittelwert zurückkehren.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blough, S. R. (1992). The Relationship between Power and Level for Generic Unit Root Tests in Finite Samples.Journal of Applied Econometrics 7 (3): 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiano, L. J., and M. Eichenbaum (1990). Unit Roots in Real GNP: Do We Know and Do We Care?Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 32: 7–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coakley, J., and A. M. Fuertes (1997). New Panel Unit Root Tests of PPP.Economics Letters 57 (1): 17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, J. (1991). A Critique of the Application of Unit Root Tests.Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 15 (6): 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, Y., and K. S. Lai (1993). Finite Sample Sizes of Johansen’s Likelihood Ratio Tests for Cointegration.Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 55 (3): 313–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, W. (1995).Applied Econometric Time Series. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, J. (1987). An Empirical Investigation of the Long-Run Behaviour of Real Exchange Rates.Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 27:149–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im, K. S., M. H. Pesaran, and Y. Shin (1998). Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. University of Cambridge mimeo, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S., and K. Juselius (1990). Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration — with Applications to the Demand for Money.Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52 (2): 169–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, R., J. Lyhagen, and M. Lothgren (1998). Likelihood Based Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels. Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance No. 250. Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A., and C-F. Lin (1992). Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties. University of California Working Paper 92, 23. University of California, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lothian, J., and M. Taylor (1996). Real Exchange Rate Behaviour: The Recent Float from the Perspective of the Past Two Centuries.Journal of Political Economy 104 (3): 488–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, R. (1996). Panel Unit Root Tests and Real Exchange Rates.Economics Letters 50 (1): 7–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, P. G. J. (1998). The Overvaluation of Purchasing Power Parity.Journal of International Economics 44 (1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, K. Y. (1996). Purchasing Power Parity and Unit Root Tests using Panel Data.Journal of International Money and Finance 15 (3): 405–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantula, S. G., G. Gonzalez-Farias, and W. A. Fuller (1994). A Comparison of Unit-Root Test Criteria.Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 12 (4): 449–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. C. B., and H. R. Moon (1999). Nonstationary Panel Data Analysis: An Overview of Some Recent Developments. Cowles Discussion Paper 1221. Yale University, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, K. (1996). The Purchasing Power Parity Puzzle.Journal of Economic Literature 34 (2): 647–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll, R. (1979). Violations of Purchasing Power Parity Theory and their Implications for Efficient International Commodity Markets. In M. Sarnat and G. Szego (eds.),International Finance and Trade. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (1995). The Economics of Exchange Rates.Journal of Economic Literature 33 (1): 13–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. (1996). Are Real Exchange Rates Non-Stationary? Evidence from a Panel Data Test.Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 28 (1): 54–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zivot, E., and D. W. K. Andrews (1992). Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock and the Unit Root Hypothesis.Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10 (3): 251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Parikh, A., Wakerly, E. Real exchange rates and unit root tests. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 136, 478–490 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707290

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707290

Navigation