Skip to main content
Log in

Risk analysis using automatically synthesized robust accident scenarios and consequence assessment for chemical processes: Process partition and consequence analysis approach

  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consequence analysis and risk assessment are very important in chemical process industries because of the potential risk of hazardous materials. In this paper, we introduce a new system for consequence analysis and risk management (CARM) and propose a new strategy for producing robust accident scenarios in quantitative risk assessment. The suggested synthesis method analyzes process elements and selects and generates robust accident scenarios that simulate the most possible worst-case accident that should be foremost considered. The scenario-reasoning scheme consists of three types of knowledge base (equipment property, material property, and process unit knowledge) and four reasoning algorithms (macro decomposition, equipment screening, equipment behavior analysis, and accident scenarios reasoning). The synthesized result of the analysis enhances the reliability of the generated accident scenario and prevents the risks from being overestimated. The obtained result, as easily confirmed by using CARM, should be more helpful in proper process design and emergency planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnaldos, X, Casal, X, Montiel, H., Sanchez-Carricondo, M. and Vilchez, J. A., “Design of a Computer Tool for the Consequences of Accidental Natural Gas Releases in Distribution Pipes”Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,11(2), 135 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CCPS, “Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures,” 2nd Ed, CCPS of the AIChE(1992).

  • CCPS, “Guidelines for Evaluating the Characteristics of Vapor Cloud Explosions, Flash Fires, and BLEVEs,” CCPS of the AIChE (1994).

  • CCPS, “Guidelines for Use of Vapor Cloud Dispersion Models,” 2nd Ed, CCPS of the AIChE (1996).

  • Chae, H, Yoon, Y H. and Yoon, E. S, “Safety Analysis Using an Expert System in Chemical Processes,”Korean J. Chem. Eng.,11,153 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EPA, RMP Offsite Consequence Analysis Guidance, EPA (1999). Frank, P. M, “Fault Diagnosis in Dynamic System Using Analytical and Knowledge-based Redundancy: A Survey and Some New Result,”Automatica,26, 459 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, Y D. and Kim, J. Y, “Explosion Hazard Analysis in Partially Confined Area,”Korean J. Chem. Eng.,18, 292 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, F. I. and Abbasi, S. A, “Techniques and Methodologies for Risk Analysis in Chemical Process Industries”Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,11(4), 261 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. H, “Automatic Synthesis of Accident Scenarios for Chemical Processes” Ph.D. Thesis, Seoul National University (2000).

  • Murphy, X F. and Zimmermann, K. A, “Making RMP Hazard Assessment Meaningful,”Process Safety Progress,17(4), 238 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to En Sup Yoon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, K.H., Shin, D. & Yoon, E.S. Risk analysis using automatically synthesized robust accident scenarios and consequence assessment for chemical processes: Process partition and consequence analysis approach. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 20, 992–999 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02706927

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02706927

Key words

Navigation