Abstract
Effects of different temperatures on bud break and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) content were determined by using potted two-year-old ‘Akatsuki’ peach trees. One group of trees were subjected to 1°C for four weeks and then transferred to a growth chamber at 24°C, while the other was kept at 24 °C throughout the experiment. After four-week temperature treatments floral and vegetative bud break were evaluated weekly and bud break percentage was calculated. Bud break was greater under 1 °C than 24 °C in both November and December. The time required to release buds from dormancy was shorter in December than November. In November ACC content in peach buds increased after one and two weeks, then decreased in the forth week under both treatments. However, in December ACC content after two and four weeks showed a similar trend under 1 °C and a reverse trend under 24 °C. It was higher under low temperature treatment. These data indicate that chilling requirements for bud break of peach seems to be associated with the promotion of ethylene biosynthesis caused by low temperature stress.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abeles F.B., Morgan P.W., Saltveit M.E. 1992. Ethylene in Plant Biology. Academic Press, San Diego.
Antunes M.D.C., Sfakiotakis E.M. 2002. Chilling induced ethylene biosynthesis in ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit following storage. Scientia Horticulturae 92: 29–39.
Crabbe J., Barnola P. 1996. A new conceptual approach to bud dormancy in woody plants, p. 115–132. In: G.A. Lang (ed.). Plant dormancy, Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. CAB Intl., London.
Concellon A., Anon M.C., Chaves A.R. 2005. Effect of chilling on ethylene production in eggplant fruit. Food Chemistry 92: 63–69.
El-Shereif A.R., Mizutani F., Onguso J.M., Sharif Hossain A.B.M. 2005. Effects of different temperatures and sampling dates on bud break and ACC content of ‘Muscat Bailey A’ grapevine buds. Int. J. Bot. 1: 34–37.
Erez A., Couvillon G.A., Kays S.L. 1980. The effect of oxygen concentration on the release of peach leaf buds from rest. HortScience 15: 39–41.
Fuchigami L.H., Nee C. 1987. Degree growth stage model and rest-breaking mechanisms in temperate woody perennials. HortScience 22:836–845.
Iwasaki K. 1980. Effect of bud scale removal, calcium cyanamide, GA3, and ethephon on bud break of ‘Muscat of Alexandria’ grape (Vitis vinifera L.). J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 48:395–398.
Iwasaki K., Weaver R.J. 1977. Effects of chilling, calcium cyanamide, and bud scale removal on bud break, rooting, and inhibitor content of buds of ‘Zinfandel’ grape (Vitis vinifera L.). J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 102: 584–587.
Kawamata M., Nishida E., Ohara H., Ohkawa K., Matsui H. 2002. Changes in the intensity of bud dormancy and internal compositions of current shoot in fig. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 71: 177–182.
Kuroda H., Sugiura T., Ito D. 2002. Changes in hydrogen peroxide content in flower buds of Japanese pear (Pryus pyrifolia Nakai) in relation to breaking of endodormancy. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 71: 610–616.
Larrigaudiere C., Vendrell M. 1993. Cold-induced activation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid metabolism in rewarmed ‘Granny Smith’ applies: Consequences on ripening. Scientia Horticulturae 55: 263–272.
Lelievre J.M., Tichit L., Dao P., Fillion L., Nam Y.W., Pech J.C., Latche A. 1997. Effects of chilling on the expression of ethylene biosynthetic genes in Passe-Crassane pear (Pyrus communis L.) fruits. Plant Molecular Biology 33: 847–855.
Lizada M.C.C., Yang S.F. 1979. A simple and sensitive assay for 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid. Anal. Biochem. 100: 140–145.
Mizutani F., Hino A., Amano S., Kadoya K., Watanabe J., Akiyoshi H. 1995. Effect of calcium cyanamide, GA3 and scale removal on bud break, ethylene production and ACC content in grapevine buds. Mem. Coll. Agr., Ehime Univ. 40: 91–97.
Samish R.M. 1954. Dormancy in woody plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 5:183–204.
Saure M.C. 1985. Dormancy release in deciduous fruit trees. Hort. Rev. 7:239–300.
Tohbe M., Mochioka R., Horiuchi S., Ogata T., Shiozaki S., Kurooka H. 1998a. Role of ACC and glutathione during breaking of dotmancy in grapevine buds by high temparature treatment. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 67: 897–901.
Tohbe M., Mochioka R., Horiuchi S., Ogata T., Shiozaki S., Kurooka H. 1998b. The influence of substances related to ethylene biosynthesis on breaking bud dormancy in grapevines. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 67: 902–906.
Thompson W.K., Jones D.L., Nicholes D.G. 1975. Effects of dormancy factors on the growth of vegetative buds of young apple trees. Austral. J. Agr. Res. 26: 989–996.
Wang C.Y. 1986. Effect of temperature and light on ACC and MACC in chilled cucumber seedlings. Scientia Horticulturae 30: 47–52.
Wang S.Y., Faust M., Steffens G.L. 1985. Metabolic changes in cherry flower buds associated with breaking of dormancy in early and late blooming cultivars. Physiol. Plant. 65: 89–94.
Wang S.Y., Steffens G.L., Faust M. 1986. Breaking bud dormancy in apple with a plant bioregulator, thidiazuron. Phytochemistry 25: 311–317.
Wong W.S., Nig W., Xu P.L., Kung S.D., Yang S.F., Li N. 1999. Identification of two chilling regulated 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase genes from citrus (Citrus sinensis Osbeck) fruit. Plant Molecular Biology 41: 587–600.
Yang S.F., Oetiker J.H. 1998. Molecular biology of ethylene biosynthesis and its application in horticulture. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 67: 1209–1214.
Young E., Werner D.J. 1984. Effect of rootstock and scion chilling during rest on resumption of growth in apple and peach. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 109: 548–551.
Young E., Werner D.J. 1985. Effect of shoot root and shank chilling during rest in apple and peach on growth resumption and carbohydrates. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 110: 769–774.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
El-Shereif, A.R., Mizutani, F., Onguso, J.M. et al. Influence of different temperatures on bud break and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid content of young peach trees. Acta Physiol Plant 28, 459–463 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02706629
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02706629