Conclusion
NRP can be damaging to a domestic industry. In most instances, it will not warrant counteraction since it will be merely a relief from an existing imperfection in the market system. Only if the practice is predatory should it be neutralized by commercial policy imposed by the importing government. It is possible that some protection might temporarily be instituted for phase-out purposes but this seems of little importance in an industry in which new capacity requires a long lead-time and in which product specific human capital is internationally mobile.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blackhurst, Richard, “The Twilight of Domestic Economic Policies”.The World Economy, Vol. 4, 1981, pp. 357–374.
Gray, H. Peter, “Senile Industry Protection: A Proposal”.Southern Economic journal, Vol. 40, 1973, pp. 569–574.
-,International Trade, Investment and Payments. Boston 1979.
—, Ingo Walter, “Investment-Related Trade Distortions in Petrochemicals”.Journal of World Trade Law, Vol. 17, 1983, pp. 283–305.
Grubel, Herbert G., “Effective Tariff Protection: A Non-Specialist Introduction to the Theory, Policy Implications and Controversies”. In: Herbert G. Grubel, Harry G. Johnson (Eds.),Effective Tariff Protection. Geneva 1971, pp. 1–15.
Johnson, Harry G., “The Theory of Tariff Structure”. In: Harry G. Johnson, Peter B. Kenen,Trade and Development. Geneva 1965, pp. 9–30.
Murray, Tracy, Ingo Walter, “The Impact of Export Subsidy and Tax Programs on Effective Protection”.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 111, 1975, pp. 439–451.
Teece, David J., “Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How”.The Economic Journal, Vol. 87, 1977, pp. 242–261.
About this article
Cite this article
Gray, H.P. “Natural resource pricing”, allocative efficiency and protection. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 122, 365–370 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02705750
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02705750