Journal of Biosciences

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 309–326 | Cite as

Representing biodiversity: Data and procedures for identifying priority areas for conservation

Articles

Abstract

Biodiversity priority areas together should represent the biodiversity of the region they are situated in. To achieve this, biodiversity has to be measured, biodiversity goals have to be set and methods for implementing those goals have to be applied. Each of these steps is discussed. Because it is impossible to measure all of biodiversity, biodiversity surrogates have to be used. Examples are taxa sub-sets, species assemblages and environmental domains. Each of these has different strengths and weaknesses, which are described and evaluated. In real-world priority setting, some combination of these is usually employed. While a desirable goal might be to sample all of biodiversity from genotypes to ecosystems, an achievable goal is to represent, at some agreed level, each of the biodiversity features chosen as surrogates. Explicit systematic procedures for implementing such a goal are described. These procedures use complementarity, a measure of the contribution each area in a region makes to the conservation goal, to estimate irreplaceability and flexibility, measures of the extent to which areas can be substituted for one another in order to take competing land uses into account. Persistence and vulnerability, which also play an important role in the priority setting process, are discussed briefly.

Keywords

Biodiversity priority areas biodiversity surrogates complementarity representativeness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abate T 1992 Environmental rapid-assessment programs have appeal and critics;BioScience 42 486–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackery P R, Smith C R and Vane-Wright R I (eds) 1995Carcasson’s African butterflies: an annotated catalogue of the Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea of the Afrotropical region (Melbourne: CSIRO)Google Scholar
  3. Ackery P R and Vane-Wright R I 1984Milkweed butterflies (Cornell: Cornell University Press)Google Scholar
  4. Adam P 1992 The end of conservation on the cheap;Natl. Parks J. 36 19–22Google Scholar
  5. Aiken S R 1994 Peninsular Malaysia’s protected areas’ coverage 1903-92: creation, rescission, excision, and intrusion;Environ. Conserv. 21 49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ando A, Camm J, Polasky S and Solow A 1998 Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation;Science 279 2126–2128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Austin M P 1985 Continuum concept, ordination methods and niche theory;Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16 39–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Austin M P and Heyligers P C 1989 Vegetation survey design for conservation: gradsect sampling of forests in north-eastern New South Wales;Biol. Conserv. 50 13–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Austin M P and Heyligers P C 1991 New approaches to vegetation survey design: gradsect sampling; inNature conservation: cost effective biological surveys and data analysis (eds) C R Margules and M P Austin (Melbourne: CSIRO) pp 31–36Google Scholar
  10. Austin M P, Cunningham R B and Fleming P M 1984 New approaches to direct gradient analysis using environmental scalars and statistical curve-fitting procedures;Vegetatio 55 11–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Austin M P and Meyers J A 1996 Current approaches to modelling the environmental niche of eucalypts: implications for management of forestry;For. Ecol. Manag. 85 95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Austin M P, Nicholls A O and Margules C R 1990 Measurement of the realised qualitative niche: environmental niches of fiveEucalyptus species;Ecol. Monogr. 60 161–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Awimbo J A, Norton D A and Overmars F B 1996 An evaluation of representativeness for nature conservation, Hokitika ecological district, New Zealand;Biol. Conserv. 75 177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Barnard P, Brown C J, Jarvis A M and Robertson A 1998 Extending the Namibian protected area network to safeguard hotspots of endemism and diversity;Biodiver. Conserv. 7 531–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bean M J and Wilcove D S 1997 The private-land problem;Conserv. Biol. 11 1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Beardsley K and Stoms D 1993 Compiling a map of areas managed for biodiversity in California;Nat. Areas J. 13 177–190Google Scholar
  17. Belbin L 1993 Environmental representativeness: regional partitioning and reserve selection;Biol. Conserv. 66 223–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Benson D H and Howell J 1990 Sydney’s vegetation 1788-1988: utilization, degradation and rehabilitation;Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust. 16 115–127Google Scholar
  19. Bink F A 1992 The butterflies of the future, their strategy; inFuture of butterflies in Europe: strategies for survival (eds) T Pavlick van Beek, A H Ovaa and J G van der Made (The Netherlands: Department of Nature Conservation, Agricultural University of Wageningen) pp 134–138Google Scholar
  20. Bodmer R E, Eisenberg J F and Redford K H 1997 Hunting and the likelihood of extinction of Amazonian mammals;Conserv. Biol. 11 460–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bull A L, Thackway R and Cresswell I D 1993Assessing conservation of the major Murray-Darling ecosystems [Canberra: Environmental Resources Information Network (ERIN), Australian Nature Conservation Agency]Google Scholar
  22. Burgman M A, Keith D A, Rohlf F J and Todd C R 1999 Probabilistic classification rules for setting conservation priorities;Biol. Conserv. 89 227–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Busby J R 1986 A biogeoclimatic analysis ofNothofagus cunninghamii (Hook.) Oerst. in southeastern Australia;Aust. J. Ecol. 11 1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Busby J R 1991 BIOCLIM — a bioclimatic analysis and prediction system; inNature conservation: cost effective biological surveys and data analysis (eds) C R Margules and M P Austin (Melbourne: CSIRO) pp 64–68Google Scholar
  25. Caughley G 1994 Directions in conservation biology;J. Anim. Ecol. 63 215–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Christian C S and Stewart G A 1968 Methodology of integrated surveys; inProceedings of the Toulouse conference on aerial surveys and integrated studies (Paris: UNESCO) pp 233–280Google Scholar
  27. Clifford H T and Stephenson W 1975An introduction to numerical classification (New York: Academic Press)Google Scholar
  28. Cocks K D and Baird I A 1989 Using mathematical programming to address the multiple reserve selection problem: an example from the Eyre Peninsula, South Australia;Biol. Conserv. 49 113–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Commonwealth of Australia 1995National Forest Conservation Reserves: Commonwealth Proposed Criteria (Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service)Google Scholar
  30. Cowling R M, Pressey R L, Lombard A T, Heijnis C E, Richardson D M and Cole N 1999 Framework for a conservation plan for the Cape Floristic Region (Cape Town: University of Cape Town, Institute for Plant Conservation Report 9902)Google Scholar
  31. Csuti B, Polasky S, Williams P H, Pressey R L, Camm J D, Kershaw M, Kiester A R, Downs B, Hamilton R, Huso M and Sahr K 1997 A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon;Biol. Conserv. 80 83–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Davies K F, Margules C R and Lawrence J F 2000 Which traits of species predict population declines in experimental forest fragments?;Ecology 81 1450–1461Google Scholar
  33. Disney R H L 1986 Inventory surveys of insect faunas: discussion of a particular attempt;Antenna (London)10 112–116Google Scholar
  34. Edwards V M and Sharp B M H 1990 Institutional arrangements for conservation on private land in New Zealand;J. Environ. Manag. 31 313–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ehrlich P R and Wilson E O 1991 Biodiversity studies: science and policy;Science 253 758–762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Eldredge N and Salthe S N 1984 Hierarchy and evolution; inOxford surveys in evolutionary biology (eds) R Dawkins and M Ridley (Oxford: Oxford University Press) vol. 1, pp 184–208Google Scholar
  37. Erwin T L 1982 Tropical forests: their richness in Coleoptera and other arthropod species;Coleopterists’ Bull. 36 74–75Google Scholar
  38. Erwin T L 1983 Tropical forest canopies: the last biotic frontier;Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 30 14–19Google Scholar
  39. Faith D P 1992a Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity;Biol. Conserv. 61 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Faith D P 1992b Systematics and conservation: on predicting the feature diversity of subsets of taxa;Cladistics 8 361–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Faith D P 1994 Phylogenetic pattern and the quantification of organismal biodiversity;Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B345 45–58Google Scholar
  42. Faith D P and Walker P A 1996a Environmental diversity: on the best-possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areas;Biodiver. Conserv. 5 399–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Faith D P and Walker P A 1996b Integrating conservation and development: incorporating vulnerability into biodiversity-assessment of areas;Biodiver. Conserv. 5 417–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Faith D P, Margules C R and Walker P A 2001a A biodiversity conservation plan for Papua New Guinea based on biodiversity trade-offs analysis;Pacific Conserv. Biol. 6 304–324Google Scholar
  45. Faith D P, Margules C R, Walker P A, Stein J and Natera G 2001b Practical application of biodiversity surrogates and percentage targets for conservation in Papua New Guinea;Pacific Conserv. Biol. 6 289–303Google Scholar
  46. Faith D P, Walker P A and Margules C R 2001c Some future prospects for systematic biodiversity planning in Papua New Guinea — and for biodiversity planning in general;Pacific Conserv. Biol. 6 325–334Google Scholar
  47. Farrier D 1995 Policy instruments for conserving biodiversity on private land; inConserving biodiversity: threats and solutions (eds) R A Bradstock, T D Auld, D A Keith, R T Kingsford, D Lunney and D P Sivertsen (Sydney: Surrey Beatty) pp 337–359Google Scholar
  48. Ferrier S, Pressey R L and Barrett T W 2000 A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinement;Biol. Conserv. 93 303–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ferrier S and Watson G 1997An evaluation of the effectiveness of environmental surrogates and modelling techniques in predicting the distribution of biological diversity (Canberra: Environment Australia)Google Scholar
  50. Forey P L, Humphries C J and Vane-Wright R I (eds) 1994Systematics and conservation evaluation (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  51. Freitag S, Nicholls A O and van Jaarsveld A S 1996 Nature reserve selection in the Transvaal, South Africa: what data should we be using?;Biodiver. Conserv. 5 685–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Gámez R 1991 Biodiversity conservation through facilitation of its sustainable use: Costa Rica’s National Biodiversity Institute;Trends Ecol. Evol. 6 377–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Gaston K J, Pressey R L and Margules C R 2002 Persistence and vulnerability: retaining biodiversity in the landscape and in protected areas;J. Biosci. (Suppl. 2)27 361–384PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Gaston K J, Williams P H, Eggleton P J and Humphries C J 1995 Large scale patterns of biodiversity: spatial variation in family richness;Proc. R. Soc. London B260 149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Gauch H G 1982Multivariate analysis in community ecology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
  56. Gillison A N and Brewer K R W 1985 The use of gradient directed transects in natural resource surveys;J. Environ. Manag. 20 103–127Google Scholar
  57. Hammond P M 1992 Species inventory; inGlobal biodiversity: status of the Earth’s living resources (ed.) B Groombridge (London: Chapman and Hall) pp 17–39Google Scholar
  58. Henderson N 1992 Wilderness and the nature conservation ideal: Britain, Canada and the United States contrasted;Ambio 21 394–399Google Scholar
  59. Hovore F T 1991 INBio: by biologists, for biologists;Am. Entomol. (Fall 1991) 157–158Google Scholar
  60. Howard P C, Viskanic P, Davenport T R B, Kigenyi F W, Baltzer M, Dickinson C J, Lwanga J S, Matthews R A and Balmford A 1998 Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda;Nature (London)394 472–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hughes J B, Daily G C and Ehrlich P R 1997 Population diversity: its extent and extinction;Science 278 689–692PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Humphries C J, Williams P H and Vane-Wright R I 1995 Measuring biodiversity value for conservation;Annu. Rev. Syst. Ecol. 26 93–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hutchinson G E 1958 Concluding remarks;Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 22 415–427Google Scholar
  64. JANIS (Joint ANZECC/MCFFA National Forest Policy Statement Implementation Sub-committee) 1997Nationally agreed criteria for the establishment of a comprehensive, adequate and representative reserve system for forests in Australia (Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia)Google Scholar
  65. Janzen D H 1991 How to save tropical biodiversity: the National Biodiversity Institute of Costa Rica;Am. Entomol. (Fall 1991) 159–171Google Scholar
  66. Keith D A 1995 Involving ecologists and local communities in survey, planning and action for conservation in a rural landscape: an example from the Bega Valley, New South Wales; inNature conservation 4 — the role of networks (eds) D A Saunders, J L Craig and E M Mattiske (Sydney: Surrey Beatty) pp 385–400Google Scholar
  67. Keith D A and Bedward M 1999 Native vegetation of the south east forests region, Eden, New South Wales;Cunninghamia 61–218Google Scholar
  68. Kirchhofer A 1997 The assessment of fish vulnerability in Switzerland based on distribution data;Biol. Conserv. 80 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kirkpatrick J B 1983 An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania;Biol. Conserv. 25 127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kirkpatrick J B 1987 Forest reservation in Tasmania;Search 18 138–142Google Scholar
  71. Knight R L 1999 Private lands: the neglected geography;Conserv. Biol. 13 223–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Knopf F L and Samson, F B 1994 Biological diversity — science and action;Conserv. Biol. 8 909–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Kremen C 1992 Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring;Ecol. Appl. 2 203–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lambert J and Elix J 1996 Community involvement: incorporating the values, needs and aspirations of the wider community in bioregional planning; inApproaches to bioregional planning, Part 1 (ed.) R Breckwoldt (Canberra: Department of the Environment, Sport and Territories Biodiversity Series Paper No. 10) pp 59–65Google Scholar
  75. Leader-Williams N, Harrison J and Green M J B 1990 Designing protected areas to conserve natural resources;Sci. Prog. 74 189–204Google Scholar
  76. Ludwig D 1999 Is it meaningful to estimate a probability of extinction?;Ecology 80 298–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Mackey B G, Nix H A, Stein J A, Cork S E and Bullen F T 1989 Assessing the representativeness of the wet tropics of Queensland World Heritage property;Biol. Conserv. 50 279–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. MacKinnon J 1992The Logic of MASS (Hong Kong: Asian Bureau for Conservation)Google Scholar
  79. Majer J D 1983 Ants as bio-indicators of minesite rehabilitation, land use and land conservation;Environ. Manag. 7 375–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Margules C R 1986 Conservation evaluation in practice; inWildlife conservation evaluation (ed.) M B Usher (London: Chapman and Hall) pp 297–314Google Scholar
  81. Margules C R 1989 Introduction to some Australian developments in conservation evaluation;Biol. Conserv. 50 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Margules C R and Austin M P 1994 Biological models for monitoring species decline: the construction and use of data bases;Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B343 69–75Google Scholar
  83. Margules C R and Pressey R L 2000 Systematic conservation planning;Nature (London)405 243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Margules C R, Cresswell I D and Nicholls A O 1994 A scientific basis for establishing networks of protected areas; inSystematics and conservation evaluation (eds) P L Forey, C J Humphries and R I Vane-Wright (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp 327–350Google Scholar
  85. Margules C R, Nicholls A O and Pressey R L 1988 Selecting networks of reserves to maximize biological diversity;Biol. Conserv. 43 63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Margules C R, Redhead T D, Faith D P and Hutchinson M F 1995BioRap: guidelines for using the biorap methodology and tools (Canberra: CSIRO)Google Scholar
  87. Margules C R and Usher M B 1981 Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: a review;Biol. Conserv. 21 79–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. McKenzie N L, Belbin L, Margules C R and Keighery G J 1989 Selecting representative reserve systems in remote areas: a case study in the Nullarbor region, Australia;Biol. Conserv. 50 239–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. McKinney M L 1997 Extinction vulnerability and selectivity: combining ecological and paleontological views;Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28 495–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Miller K R 1996Balancing the scales: guidelines for increasing biodiversity’s chances through bioregional management (Washington DC: World Resources Institute)Google Scholar
  91. Mittermeier R A, Myers N, Thomsen J B, da Fonseca GAB and Olivieri S 1998 Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities;Conserv. Biol. 12 516–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Moore N W 1987The bird of time: the science and politics of nature conservation — a personal account (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
  93. Myers N, Mittermeier R A, Mittermeier C G, da Fonseca GAB and Kent J 2000 Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities;Nature (London)403 853–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Nelson G 1985 Class and individual: a reply to M Ghiselin;Cladistics 1 386–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Nicholls A O 1989 How to make biological surveys go further with Generalised Linear Models;Biol. Conserv. 50 51–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Nicholls A O 1991 Examples of the use of Generalised Linear Models in Analysis of Survey Data for Conservation Evaluation; inNature conservation: cost effective biological surveys and data analysis (eds) C R Margules and M P Austin (Melbourne: CSIRO) pp 54–63Google Scholar
  97. Nicholls A O and Margules C R 1993 An upgraded reserve selection algorithm;Biol. Conserv. 64 165–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Nix H A 1982 Environmental determinants of biogeography and evolution in Terra Australis; inEvolution of the flora and fauna of arid Australia (eds) W R Baker and P J M Greenslade (South Australia: Peacock Publishers) pp 47–56Google Scholar
  99. Nix H A 1986 A biogeographic analysis of Australian elapid snakes; inAtlas of elapid snakes of Australia (Australian Flora and Fauna Series No. 7) (ed.) R Longmore (Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service) pp 4–17Google Scholar
  100. Nix H A, Faith D P, Hutchinson M F, Margules C R, West J, Allison A, Kesteven J L, Natera G, Slater W, Stein J L and Walker P 2000The BioRap Toolbox: A National Study of Biodiversity Assessment and Planning for Papua New Guinea (Canberra: Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University)Google Scholar
  101. Noss R F 1987 From plant communities to landscapes in conservation inventories: a look at the Nature Conservancy (USA);Biol. Conserv. 41 11–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Noss R F 1990 Indicators and monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach;Conserv. Biol. 4 355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Noss R F and Cooperrider A Y 1994Saving nature’s legacy: protecting and restoring biodiversity (Washington DC: Island Press)Google Scholar
  104. Noss R F, Strittholt J R, Vance-Borland K, Carroll C and Frost P 1999 A conservation plan for the Klamath-Siskiyou eco-region;Nat. Areas J. 19 392–411Google Scholar
  105. Oliver I and Beattie A J 1993 A possible method for the rapid assessment of biodiversity;Conserv. Biol. 7 562–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Olivieri S, Bowles I A, Cavalvanti R B, de Fonseca GAB, Mittermeier R A and Rodstrum C B 1995A participatory approach to biodiversity conservation: the regional priority setting workshop (Washington DC: Conservation International)Google Scholar
  107. Paal J 1998 Rare and threatened plant communities of Estonia;Biodiver. Conserv. 7 1027–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Perring F 1958 A theoretical approach to a study of chalk grassland;J. Ecol. 46 665–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Perring F 1959 Topographical gradients in chalk grassland;J. Ecol. 47 447–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Prendergast J R and Eversham B C 1997 Species richness covariance in higher taxa: empirical tests of the biodiversity indicator concept;Ecography 20 210–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Prendergast J R, Quinn R M, Lawton J H, Eversham B C and Gibbons D W 1993 Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies;Nature (London)365 335–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Pressey R L 1992 Nature conservation in rangelands: lessons from research on reserve selection in New South Wales;Rangeland J. 14 214–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Pressey R L 1994 Ad hoc reservations: forward or backward steps in developing representative reserve systems?;Conserv. Biol. 8 662–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Pressey R L 1998 Algorithms, politics and timber: an example of the role of science in a public political negotiation process over new conservation areas in production forests; inEcology for everyone: Communicating ecology to scientists, the public and politicians (eds) R Willis and R Hobbs (Sydney: Surrey Beatty) pp 73–87Google Scholar
  115. Pressey R L, Ferrier S, Hager T C, Woods C A, Tully S L and Weinman K M 1996a How well protected are the forests of north-eastern New South Wales? — analyses of forest environments in relation to tenure, formal protection measures and vulnerability to clearing;For. Ecol. Manag. 85 311–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Pressey R L, Possingham H P and Margules C R 1996b Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: when does it matter and how much?;Biol. Conserv. 76 259–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Pressey R L, Hager T C, Ryan K M, Schwarz J, Wall S, Ferrier S and Creaser P M 2000 Using abiotic data for conservation assessments over extensive regions: quantitative methods applied across New South Wales, Australia;Biol. Conserv. 96 55–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Pressey R L, Humphries C J, Margules C R, Vane-Wright R I and Williams P H 1993 Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection;Trends Ecol. Evol. 8 124–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Pressey R L, Johnson I R and Wilson P D 1994 Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal;Biodiver. Conserv. 3 242–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Pressey R L and Logan V S 1995 Reserve coverage and requirements in relation to partitioning and generalisation of land classes: analysis of western New South Wales;Conserv. Biol. 9 1506–1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Pressey R L and Nicholls, A O 1989 Efficiency in conservation evaluation: scoring versus iterative approaches;Biol. Conserv. 50 199–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Pressey R L and Tully S L 1994 The cost of ad hoc reservation: a case study in western New South Wales;Aust. J. Ecol. 19 375–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Prober S and Thiele K 1993 Surviving in cemeteries — the grassy white box woodlands;Natl. Parks J. 37 13–15Google Scholar
  124. RACAC (Resource and Conservation Assessment Council) 1996Draft interim forestry assessment report (Sydney: RACAC)Google Scholar
  125. Redford K, Andrews M, Braun D, Buttrick S, Chaplin S, Coon M, Cox R, Ellis L, Grossman D, Groves C, Livermore D, Pearsall S, Shopland J, Tabas P, Wall K, Williamson D and Rousmaniere N 1997Designing a geography of hope: guidelines for ecoregion conservation in the Nature Conservancy 1st edition (Arlington: Nature Conservancy)Google Scholar
  126. Rebelo A G 1994 Iterative selection procedures: centres of endemism and optimal placement of reserves; inBotanical diversity in southern Africa (ed.) B J Huntley (Pretoria: National Botanical Institute) pp 231–257Google Scholar
  127. Rebelo A G 1997 Conservation; inVegetation of southern Africa (eds) R M Cowling, D M Richardson and S M Pierce (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp 571–590Google Scholar
  128. Rebelo A G and Siegfried W R 1990 Protection of Fynbos vegetation: ideal and real-world options;Biol. Conserv. 54 15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Rebelo A G and Siegfried W R 1992 Where should nature reserves be located in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa? Models for the spatial configuration of a reserve network aimed at maximising the protection of floral diversity;Conserv. Biol. 6 243–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Richards B N, Bridges R G, Curtin R A, Nix H A, Shepherd, K R and Turner J 1990Biological conservation of the south-east forests (Report of the Joint Scientific Committee) (Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service)Google Scholar
  131. Runte A 1979National parks: the American experience (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press)Google Scholar
  132. Ryti R T 1992 Effect of the focal taxon on the selection of nature reserves;Ecol. Appl. 2 404–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Sandlund O T 1991 Costa Rica’s INBio: towards sustainable use of natural diversity;Norw. Inst. Nat. Res. Notat 7 1–25Google Scholar
  134. Sarkar S 1999 Wilderness preservation and biodiversity conservation — keeping divergent goals distinct;BioScience 49 405–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Schulz S, Boppré M and Vane-Wright R I 1993 Specific mixtures of secretions from male scent organs of Kenyan milkweed butterflies (Danainae);Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B342 161–181Google Scholar
  136. Smith P G R and Theberge J B 1986 A review of criteria for evaluating natural areas;Environ. Manag. 10 715–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Smith P G R and Theberge J B 1987 Evaluating natural areas using multiple criteria: theory and practice;Environ. Manag. 11 447–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Soulé M E 1990 The real work of systematics;Ann. Missouri Bot. Garden 77 4–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Stork N E 1988 Insect diversity: fact, fiction and speculation;Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 35 321–337Google Scholar
  140. Stork N E and Gaston K J 1990 Counting species one by one;NewSci. 127 31–35Google Scholar
  141. Strom A A 1979 Impressions of a developing conservation ethic, 1870–1930;Parks Wildlife 2 45–53Google Scholar
  142. Strom A A 1990 Response to: Conserving what? — the basis for nature conservation reserves in New South Wales 1967–1989;Aust. Zool. 26 94–96Google Scholar
  143. Thomas J and Lewington R 1991The butterflies of Britain and Ireland (London: Dorling Kindersley)Google Scholar
  144. Underhill L G 1994 Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithms;Biol. Conserv. 70 85–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Usher M B 1986 Wildlife conservation evaluation: attributes, criteria and values; inWildlife conservation evaluation (ed.) M B Usher (London: Chapman and Hall) pp 3–44Google Scholar
  146. Vane-Wright R I 1978 Ecological and behavioural origins of diversity in butterflies; inDiversity of insect faunas (eds) L A Mound and N Waloff (Oxford: Blackwell) pp 56–70Google Scholar
  147. Vane-Wright R I 1992 Systematics and diversity. Species concepts; inGlobal biodiversity: status of the Earth’s living resources (ed.) B Groombridge (London: Chapman and Hall) pp 7–16Google Scholar
  148. Vane-Wright R I 1996 Identifying priorities for the conservation of biodiversity: systematic biological criteria within a socio-political framework; inBiodiversity: a biology of numbers and difference (ed.) K J Gaston (Oxford: Blackwell) pp 309–344Google Scholar
  149. Vane-Wright R I, Humphries C J and Williams P H 1991 What to protect? — systematics and the agony of choice;Biol. Conserv. 55 235–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. van Jaarsveld A S, Freitag S, Chown S L, Muller C, Koch S, Hull H, Bellamy C, Kroeger M, Endroedy-Younga S, Mansell M W and Scholtz C H 1998 Biodiversity assessment and conservation strategies;Science 279 2106–2108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Ward T J, Kenchington R A, Faith D P and Margules C R 1998Marine BioRap Guidelines: Rapid Assessment of Marine Biological Diversity (Perth: CSIRO)Google Scholar
  152. Wessels K J, vanJaarsveld A S, Grimbeek J D and van derLinde M J 1998 An evaluation of the gradsect biological survey method;Biodiver. Conserv. 7 1093–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. White D, Minotti P G, Barczak M J, Sifneos J C, Freemark K E, Santelmann M V, Steinitz C F, Kiester A R and Preston E M 1997 Assessing risks to biodiversity from future landscape change;Conserv. Biol. 11 349–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Whitehead P 1990 Systematics: an endangered species;Syst. Zool. 39 179–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Whittaker R H 1956 Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains;Ecol. Monogr. 26 1–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Whittaker R H 1960 Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California;Ecol. Monogr. 30 279–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Wille C 1993 Costa Rica’s parataxonomists search for “green gold”; inNature Conservancy Annual Report, January/ February 1993, pp 11–17Google Scholar
  158. Williams P H 1996 Measuring biodiversity value;World Conserv. 1 12–14Google Scholar
  159. Williams P H and Gaston K J 1994 Measuring more of biodiversity: can higher-taxon richness predict wholesale species richness?;Biol. Conserv. 67 211–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Williams P H and Gaston K J 1998 Biodiversity indicators: graphical techniques, smoothing and searching for what makes relationships work;Ecography 21 551–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Williams P H, Humphries C J, Araujo M B, Lahti T, Lampinen, Uotila P and Vane-Wright R I 1999 Important Plant Areas of Europe: exploring the consequences of selection criteria; inPlanta Europa (eds) H Synge and J Akeroyd (London: Plantlife) pp 103–109Google Scholar
  162. Williams P H, Humphries C J and Vane-Wright R I 1991 Measuring biodiversity: taxonomic relatedness for conservation priorities;Aust. Syst. Bot. 4 665–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Williams P H, Margules C R and Hilbert D W 2002 Data requirements and data sources for biodiversity priority area selection;J. Biosci. (Suppl. 2)27 327–338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. Williams W T 1976Pattern analysis in agricultural science (Melbourne: CSIRO)Google Scholar
  165. Wilson E O and Peters F M (eds) 1988Biodiversity (Washington DC: National Academy Press)Google Scholar
  166. Yen A L 1987 A preliminary assessment of the correlation between plant, vertebrate and Coleoptera communities in the Victorian mallee; inThe role of invertebrates in conservation and biological survey (ed.) J D Majer (Perth, Western Australia: Department of Conservation and Land Management) pp 73–88Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. R. Margules
    • 1
  • R. L. Pressey
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. H. Williams
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.CSIRO Sustainable EcosystemsTropical Forest Research Centre and the Rainforest Cooperative Research CentreAthertonAustralia
  2. 2.New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife ServiceArmidaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations