Abstract
Escherichia coli MutS is a versatile repair protein that specifically recognizes not only various types of mismatches but also single stranded loops of up to 4 nucleotides in length. Specific binding, followed by the next step of tracking the DNA helix that locates hemi-methylated sites, is regulated by the conformational state of the protein as a function of ATP binding/hydrolysis. Here, we study how various molecular determinants of a heteroduplex regulate mismatch recognition by MutS, the critical first step of mismatch repair. Using classical DNase I footprinting assays, we demonstrate that the hierarchy of MutS binding to various types of mismatches is identical whether the mismatches are present singly or in multiples. Moreover, this unique hierarchy is indifferent both to the differential level of DNA helical flexibility and to the unpaired status of the mismatched bases in a heteroduplex. Surprisingly, multiple mismatches exhibit reduced affinity of binding to MutS, compared to that of a similar single mismatch. Such a reduction in the affinity might be due to sequence context effects, which we established more directly by studying two identical single mismatches in an altered sequence background. A mismatch, upon simply being flipped at the same location, elicits changes in MutS specific contacts, thereby underscoring the importance of sequence context in modulating MutS binding to mismatches.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- DEPC:
-
Diethyl pyrocarbonate
- DTT:
-
dithiothreitol
- IDLs:
-
insertion deletion loops
References
Allawi H T and SantaLucia J Jr 1998 NMR solution structure of a DNA dodecamer containing GT mismatches;Nucleic Acids Res. 26 4925–4934
Arnold F H, Wolk S, Cruz P and Tinoco I 1987 Structure, dynamics, and thermodynamics of mismatched DNA oligonucleotide duplexes d(CCCAGGG)2 and d(CCCTGGG)2;Biochemistry 26 4068–4075
Bhattacharya A and Lilley D 1989a Single Base Mismatches in DNA Long- and short-range structure probed by analysis of axis trajectory and local chemical reactivity;J. Mol. Biol. 209 583–597
Bhattacharya A and Lilley D 1989b The contrasting structures of mismatched DNA sequences containing looped-out bases bulges and multiple mismatches (bubbles);Nucleic Acids Res. 17 6821–6840
Biswas I and Hsieh P 1997 Interaction of MutS protein with the major and minor grooves of a heteroduplex DNA;J. Biol. Chem. 272 13355–13364
Boulard Y, Cognet J A and Fazakerley G V 1997 Solution structure as a function of pH of two central mismatches C-T and C-C in the 29 to 39 K-ras gene sequence by nuclear magnetic resonance and molecular dynamics;J. Mol. Biol. 268 331–347
Brown J, Brown T and Fox K R 2001 Affinity of mismatch-binding protein MutS for heteroduplexes containing different mismatches;Biochem. J. 354 627–633
Fazakerley G V, Quignard E, Woisard A, Guschlbauer W, van der Marel, van Boom J H, Jones M and Radman M 1986 Structures of mismatched base pairs in DNA and their recognition by theEscherichia coli mismatch repair system;EMBO J. 13 3697–3703
Gervais V, Cognet J A, Le Bret M, Sowers L C and Fazakerley G V 1995 Solution structure of two mismatches A.A and T.T in the K-ras gene context by nuclear magnetic resonance and molecular dynamics;Eur. J. Biochem. 228 279–290
Hagerman P J 1988 Flexibility of DNA;Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 17 265–286
Hunter W N, Brown T, Kneale G, Anand N N, Rabinovich D and Kennard O 1987 The structure of guanosine-thymidine mismatches in B-DNA at 2.5-A resolution;J. Biol. Chem. 262 9962–9970
Jiricny J 1998 Replication errors: cha(lle)nging the genome;EMBO J. 17 6427–6436
Jiricny J, Su S, Wood S and Modrich P 1988 Mismatch-containing oligonucleotide duplexes bound by theE. coli mutS-encoded protein;Nucleic Acids Res. 16 7843–7853
Joshi A, Sen S and Rao B J 2000 ATP-hydrolysis-dependent conformational switch modulates the stability of MutS-mismatch complexes;Nucleic Acids Res. 28 853–861
Jones M, Wagner R and Radman M 1987 Repair of a mismatch is influenced by the base composition of the surrounding nucleotide sequence;Genetics 115 605–610
Kahn J D, Yun E and Crothers D M 1994 Detection of localized DNA flexibility;Nature (London) 368 163–166
Karthikeyan G, Wagle M and Rao B J 1998 Non-Watson-Crick base pairs modulate homologous alignments in RecA pairing reactions;FEBS Lett. 425 45–51
Kouchakdjian M, Li B F L, Swann P F and Patel D J 1988 Pyrimidine-pyrimidine base pair mismatches in DNA. A nuclear magnetic resonance study of T.T pairing at neutral pH and C.C pairing at acidic pH in dodecanucleotide duplexes;J. Mol. Biol. 202 139–155
Kolodner R 1996 Biochemistry and genetics of eukaryotic mismatch repair;Genes Dev. 10 1433–1442
Kolodner R D and Marsischky G T 1999 Eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair;Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9 89–96
Lamers M H, Perrakis A, Enzlin J H, Winterwerp H H, de Wind N and Sixma T K 2000 The crystal structure of DNA mismatch repair protein MutS binding to a G × T mismatch;Nature (London) 407 711–717
Lane A, Ebel S and Brown T1994 Properties of multiple G.A mismatches in stable oligonucleotide duplexes;Eur. J. Biochem. 220 717 -727
Lane A N and Peck B 1995 Conformational flexibility in DNA duplexes containing single G.G mismatches;Eur. J. Biochem. 230 1073–1087
Leonard N J, McDonald J J, Henderson R E L and Reichmann A 1971 Reaction of diethyl pyrocarbonate with nucleic acid components. Adenosine;Biochemistry 10 3335–3342
Malkov V A, Biswas I, Camerini-Otero D and Hsieh P 1997 Photocross-linking of the NH2-terminal region of Taq MutS protein to the major groove of a heteroduplex DNA;J. Biol. Chem. 272 23811–23817
Marra G and Schar P 1999 Recognition of DNA alterations by the mismatch repair system;Biochem. J. 338 1–13
Marathias V M, Jerkovic B and Bolton P H 1999 Damage increases the flexibility of duplex DNA;Nucleic Acids Res. 1854–1888
Marathias V M, Jerkovic B, Arthanaari H and Bolton P H 2000 Flexibility and curvature of duplex DNA containing mismatched sites as a function of temperature;Biochemistry 39 153–160
Modrich P and Lahue R 1996 Mismatch repair in replication fidelity, genetic recombination, and cancer biology;Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65 101–133
Mol C D, Parikh S S, Putnam C D, Lo T P and Tainer J A 1999 DNA repair mechanisms for the recognition and removal of damaged DNA bases;Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 28 101–128
Obmolova G, Ban C, Hsieh P and Yang W 2000 Crystal structures of mismatch repair protein MutS and its complex with a substrate DNA;Nature (London) 407 703–710
Parker B O and Marinus M G 1992 Repair of DNA heteroduplexes containing small heterologous sequences inEscherichia coli;Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89 1730–1734
Patel D J, Kozlowski S A, Ikuta S and Itakura K 1984a Deoxyguanosine-deoxyadenosine pairing in the d(C-G-A-G-A-AT-T-C-G-C-G duplex: conformation and dynamics at and adjacent to the dG X dA mismatch site;Biochemistry 23 3207–3217
Patel D J, Kozlowski S A, Ikuta S and Itakura K 1984b Deoxyadenosine-deoxycytidine pairing in the d(C-G-C-G-A-A-T-T-C-A-C-G) duplex: conformation and dynamics at and adjacent to the dA X dC mismatch site;Biochemistry 23 3218–3226
Patel D J, Kozlowski S A, Ikuta S and Itakura K 1984c Dynamics of DNA duplexes containing internal G.T G.A A.C and T.C pairs: hydrogen exchange at and adjacent to mismatch sites;Fed. Proc. 43 2663–2670
Plum G E and Breslauer K J 1994 DNA lesions. A thermodynamic perspective;Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 726 45–56
Rajski S R, Jackson B A and Barton J K 2000 DNA repair: models for damage and mismatch recognition;Mutat. Res. 447 49–72
Rayssiguier C, Thaler D S and Radman M 1989 The barrier to recombination betweenEscherichia coli andSalmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch repair mutants;Nature (London) 342 396–401
Sixma T K 2001 DNA mismatch repair: MutS structures bound to mismatches;Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11 47–52
Su S and Modrich P 1986Escherichia coli mutS-encoded protein binds to mismatched DNA base pairs;Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83 5057–5061
Su S, Lahue R S, Au K G and Modrich P 1988 Mispair specificity of methyl-directed DNA mismatch correctionin vitro;J. Biol. Chem. 263 6829–6835
Vincze A, Henderson R E L, McDonald J J and Leonard N J 1973 Reaction of diethyl pyrocarbonate with nucleic acid components Bases and nucleosides derived from guanine, cytosine, and uracil;J. Am. Chem. Soc. 95 2677–2682
Werntges H, Steger G, Riesner D and Fritz H J 1986 Mismatches in DNA double strands: thermodynamic parameters and their correlation to repair efficiencies;Nucleic Acids Res. 14 3773–3790
Worth L, Bader T, Yang J and Clark S 1998 Role of MutS AT-Pase activity in MutS, L-dependent block ofin vitro strand transfer;J. Biol. Chem. 273 23176–23182
Wu and Crothers D 1984 The locus of sequence-directed and protein-induced DNA bending;Nature (London) 308 509–518
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joshi, A., Rao, B.J. MutS recognition: Multiple mismatches and sequence context effects. J. Biosci. 26, 595–606 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02704758
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02704758


