Skip to main content
Log in

MutS recognition: Multiple mismatches and sequence context effects

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Biosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Escherichia coli MutS is a versatile repair protein that specifically recognizes not only various types of mismatches but also single stranded loops of up to 4 nucleotides in length. Specific binding, followed by the next step of tracking the DNA helix that locates hemi-methylated sites, is regulated by the conformational state of the protein as a function of ATP binding/hydrolysis. Here, we study how various molecular determinants of a heteroduplex regulate mismatch recognition by MutS, the critical first step of mismatch repair. Using classical DNase I footprinting assays, we demonstrate that the hierarchy of MutS binding to various types of mismatches is identical whether the mismatches are present singly or in multiples. Moreover, this unique hierarchy is indifferent both to the differential level of DNA helical flexibility and to the unpaired status of the mismatched bases in a heteroduplex. Surprisingly, multiple mismatches exhibit reduced affinity of binding to MutS, compared to that of a similar single mismatch. Such a reduction in the affinity might be due to sequence context effects, which we established more directly by studying two identical single mismatches in an altered sequence background. A mismatch, upon simply being flipped at the same location, elicits changes in MutS specific contacts, thereby underscoring the importance of sequence context in modulating MutS binding to mismatches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DEPC:

Diethyl pyrocarbonate

DTT:

dithiothreitol

IDLs:

insertion deletion loops

References

  • Allawi H T and SantaLucia J Jr 1998 NMR solution structure of a DNA dodecamer containing GT mismatches;Nucleic Acids Res. 26 4925–4934

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold F H, Wolk S, Cruz P and Tinoco I 1987 Structure, dynamics, and thermodynamics of mismatched DNA oligonucleotide duplexes d(CCCAGGG)2 and d(CCCTGGG)2;Biochemistry 26 4068–4075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya A and Lilley D 1989a Single Base Mismatches in DNA Long- and short-range structure probed by analysis of axis trajectory and local chemical reactivity;J. Mol. Biol. 209 583–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya A and Lilley D 1989b The contrasting structures of mismatched DNA sequences containing looped-out bases bulges and multiple mismatches (bubbles);Nucleic Acids Res. 17 6821–6840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas I and Hsieh P 1997 Interaction of MutS protein with the major and minor grooves of a heteroduplex DNA;J. Biol. Chem. 272 13355–13364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boulard Y, Cognet J A and Fazakerley G V 1997 Solution structure as a function of pH of two central mismatches C-T and C-C in the 29 to 39 K-ras gene sequence by nuclear magnetic resonance and molecular dynamics;J. Mol. Biol. 268 331–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown J, Brown T and Fox K R 2001 Affinity of mismatch-binding protein MutS for heteroduplexes containing different mismatches;Biochem. J. 354 627–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fazakerley G V, Quignard E, Woisard A, Guschlbauer W, van der Marel, van Boom J H, Jones M and Radman M 1986 Structures of mismatched base pairs in DNA and their recognition by theEscherichia coli mismatch repair system;EMBO J. 13 3697–3703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gervais V, Cognet J A, Le Bret M, Sowers L C and Fazakerley G V 1995 Solution structure of two mismatches A.A and T.T in the K-ras gene context by nuclear magnetic resonance and molecular dynamics;Eur. J. Biochem. 228 279–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerman P J 1988 Flexibility of DNA;Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 17 265–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter W N, Brown T, Kneale G, Anand N N, Rabinovich D and Kennard O 1987 The structure of guanosine-thymidine mismatches in B-DNA at 2.5-A resolution;J. Biol. Chem. 262 9962–9970

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jiricny J 1998 Replication errors: cha(lle)nging the genome;EMBO J. 17 6427–6436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiricny J, Su S, Wood S and Modrich P 1988 Mismatch-containing oligonucleotide duplexes bound by theE. coli mutS-encoded protein;Nucleic Acids Res. 16 7843–7853

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Sen S and Rao B J 2000 ATP-hydrolysis-dependent conformational switch modulates the stability of MutS-mismatch complexes;Nucleic Acids Res. 28 853–861

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones M, Wagner R and Radman M 1987 Repair of a mismatch is influenced by the base composition of the surrounding nucleotide sequence;Genetics 115 605–610

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn J D, Yun E and Crothers D M 1994 Detection of localized DNA flexibility;Nature (London) 368 163–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karthikeyan G, Wagle M and Rao B J 1998 Non-Watson-Crick base pairs modulate homologous alignments in RecA pairing reactions;FEBS Lett. 425 45–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kouchakdjian M, Li B F L, Swann P F and Patel D J 1988 Pyrimidine-pyrimidine base pair mismatches in DNA. A nuclear magnetic resonance study of T.T pairing at neutral pH and C.C pairing at acidic pH in dodecanucleotide duplexes;J. Mol. Biol. 202 139–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner R 1996 Biochemistry and genetics of eukaryotic mismatch repair;Genes Dev. 10 1433–1442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner R D and Marsischky G T 1999 Eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair;Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9 89–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lamers M H, Perrakis A, Enzlin J H, Winterwerp H H, de Wind N and Sixma T K 2000 The crystal structure of DNA mismatch repair protein MutS binding to a G × T mismatch;Nature (London) 407 711–717

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lane A, Ebel S and Brown T1994 Properties of multiple G.A mismatches in stable oligonucleotide duplexes;Eur. J. Biochem. 220 717 -727

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lane A N and Peck B 1995 Conformational flexibility in DNA duplexes containing single G.G mismatches;Eur. J. Biochem. 230 1073–1087

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard N J, McDonald J J, Henderson R E L and Reichmann A 1971 Reaction of diethyl pyrocarbonate with nucleic acid components. Adenosine;Biochemistry 10 3335–3342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malkov V A, Biswas I, Camerini-Otero D and Hsieh P 1997 Photocross-linking of the NH2-terminal region of Taq MutS protein to the major groove of a heteroduplex DNA;J. Biol. Chem. 272 23811–23817

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marra G and Schar P 1999 Recognition of DNA alterations by the mismatch repair system;Biochem. J. 338 1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marathias V M, Jerkovic B and Bolton P H 1999 Damage increases the flexibility of duplex DNA;Nucleic Acids Res. 1854–1888

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marathias V M, Jerkovic B, Arthanaari H and Bolton P H 2000 Flexibility and curvature of duplex DNA containing mismatched sites as a function of temperature;Biochemistry 39 153–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Modrich P and Lahue R 1996 Mismatch repair in replication fidelity, genetic recombination, and cancer biology;Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65 101–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mol C D, Parikh S S, Putnam C D, Lo T P and Tainer J A 1999 DNA repair mechanisms for the recognition and removal of damaged DNA bases;Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 28 101–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Obmolova G, Ban C, Hsieh P and Yang W 2000 Crystal structures of mismatch repair protein MutS and its complex with a substrate DNA;Nature (London) 407 703–710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker B O and Marinus M G 1992 Repair of DNA heteroduplexes containing small heterologous sequences inEscherichia coli;Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89 1730–1734

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patel D J, Kozlowski S A, Ikuta S and Itakura K 1984a Deoxyguanosine-deoxyadenosine pairing in the d(C-G-A-G-A-AT-T-C-G-C-G duplex: conformation and dynamics at and adjacent to the dG X dA mismatch site;Biochemistry 23 3207–3217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patel D J, Kozlowski S A, Ikuta S and Itakura K 1984b Deoxyadenosine-deoxycytidine pairing in the d(C-G-C-G-A-A-T-T-C-A-C-G) duplex: conformation and dynamics at and adjacent to the dA X dC mismatch site;Biochemistry 23 3218–3226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patel D J, Kozlowski S A, Ikuta S and Itakura K 1984c Dynamics of DNA duplexes containing internal G.T G.A A.C and T.C pairs: hydrogen exchange at and adjacent to mismatch sites;Fed. Proc. 43 2663–2670

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plum G E and Breslauer K J 1994 DNA lesions. A thermodynamic perspective;Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 726 45–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajski S R, Jackson B A and Barton J K 2000 DNA repair: models for damage and mismatch recognition;Mutat. Res. 447 49–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rayssiguier C, Thaler D S and Radman M 1989 The barrier to recombination betweenEscherichia coli andSalmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch repair mutants;Nature (London) 342 396–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sixma T K 2001 DNA mismatch repair: MutS structures bound to mismatches;Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11 47–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su S and Modrich P 1986Escherichia coli mutS-encoded protein binds to mismatched DNA base pairs;Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83 5057–5061

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su S, Lahue R S, Au K G and Modrich P 1988 Mispair specificity of methyl-directed DNA mismatch correctionin vitro;J. Biol. Chem. 263 6829–6835

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vincze A, Henderson R E L, McDonald J J and Leonard N J 1973 Reaction of diethyl pyrocarbonate with nucleic acid components Bases and nucleosides derived from guanine, cytosine, and uracil;J. Am. Chem. Soc. 95 2677–2682

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Werntges H, Steger G, Riesner D and Fritz H J 1986 Mismatches in DNA double strands: thermodynamic parameters and their correlation to repair efficiencies;Nucleic Acids Res. 14 3773–3790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Worth L, Bader T, Yang J and Clark S 1998 Role of MutS AT-Pase activity in MutS, L-dependent block ofin vitro strand transfer;J. Biol. Chem. 273 23176–23182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu and Crothers D 1984 The locus of sequence-directed and protein-induced DNA bending;Nature (London) 308 509–518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Basuthkar J. Rao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joshi, A., Rao, B.J. MutS recognition: Multiple mismatches and sequence context effects. J. Biosci. 26, 595–606 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02704758

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02704758

Keywords