Abstract
The study area, Madhav National Park (MP) represents northern tropical dry deciduous forest. The national park, due to its unique location (nearest to township), is under tremendous biotic pressure. In order to understand vegetation structure and dynamics, vegetation mapping at community level was considered important. Prolonged leafless period and background reflection due to open canopy poses challenge in interpretation of satellite data. The vegetation of Madhav National Park was mapped using Landsat TM data. The ground data collected from sample points were subjected to TWINSPAN analysis to cluster sample point data into six communities. The vegetation classification obtained by interpretation (visual and digital) of remote sensing data and TWINSPAN were compared to validate the vegetation classification at community level. The phytosociological data collected from sample points were analysed to characterize communities. The results indicate that structural variations in the communities modulate spectral signatures of vegetation and form basis to describe community structure subjectively and at spatial level.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austin M P 1985 Continuum concept, ordination methods and niche theory;Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16 39–61
Beals E W 1985 Bray-Curtis ordination: An effective strategy for analysis of multivariate ecological data;Adv. Ecol. 14 1–55
Blair R M and Brunett L E 1976 Phytosociological changes after timber harvest in the southern in a southern pine ecosystem;Ecology 57 18–32
Curtis J T and McIntosh R P 1950 The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters;Ecology 31434–455
Hill M O 1979TWINSPAN—A FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two way table by classification of the individuals and attributes (Ithaca: Cornell University)
Jensen J R 1986Introductory digital image processing—A remote sensing perspective (Englewood, New Jersey: Prentice Hall)
Kuchler A W 1988 The classification of vegetation: inVegetation mapping (ed) A W Kuchler and I S Zonneveld(London: Kluwer Academic Publishers) pp 67–80
Margalef F R 1958 Information theory in ecology;Gen. Syst. 3 36–71
Phillips E A 1959Methods of vegetation study (London: Henri Holt)
Pielou E C 1966 The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections;J. Theor. Biol. 13 131–144
Rodgers W A and Panwar S H 1988 Biogeographical classification of India (Dehradun: New Forest)
Ravan S A and Roy P S 1995 Phenological stages of dry deciduous forest for improving digital classification accuracy; inProc. ISRS silver jubilee symposium on remote sensing for environmental monitoring and management with special emphasis on hill regions, Dehra Dun Feb 22–24, 1995
Roy P S, Singh S and Porwal M C 1993 Characterisation of ecological parameters in tropical forest community—A remote sensing approach;J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing 21 127–148
Shannon C E and Weaver W 1953The mathematical theory of communication (Urbana: University of Illinois Press)
Simpson E H 1949 Measurement of diversity;Nature (London) 163 688
Thomas W Brakke, William P Wergin, Erbe F and Joann M Harnden 1993 Seasonal variation in the structure and red reflectance of leaves from Yellow Poplar, Red Oak and Red Mapple;Remote Sensing Environ. 43 115–130
Treitz P M, Howarth P J and Suffling R C 1992 Application of detailed ground information to vegetation mapping with high spatial resolution digital imagery;Remote Sensing Environ. 42 65–82
Whittaker R H 1956 Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains;Ecol. Monogr. 26 1–80
Whittaker R H 1967 Gradient analysis of vegetation;Biol. Rev. 49 250–260
Whittaker R H 1975Communities and ecosystems (New York: Macmillan)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ravan, S.A., Roy, P.S. & Sharma, C.M. Space remote sensing for spatial vegetation characterization. J Biosci 20, 427–438 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02703846
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02703846