Journal of Biosciences

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 57–66 | Cite as

Analysis of human chorionic gonadotropin-monoclonal antibody interaction in BIAcore

  • Banerjee Ashish
  • Gundlupet Satyanarayana Murthy


Kinetic studies of macromolecular ligand-ligate interaction have generated ample interest since the advent of plasmon resonance based instruments like BIAcore. Most of the studies reported in literature assume a simple 1 : 1 Langmuir binding and complete reversibility of the system. However we observed that in a high affinity antigen-antibody system [human chorionic gonadotropin-monoclonal antibody (hCG-mAb)] dissociation is insignificant and the sensogram data cannot be used to measure the equilibrium and kinetic parameters. At low concentrations of mAb the complete sensogram could be fitted to a single exponential. Interestingly we found that at higher mAb concentrations, the binding data did not conform to a simple bimolecular model. Instead, the data fitted a two-step model, which may be because of surface heterogeneity of affinity sites. In this paper, we report on the global fit of the sensograms. We have developed a method by which a single two-minute sensogram can be used in high affinity systems to measure the association rate constant of the reaction and the functional capacity of the ligand (hCG) immobilized on the chip. We provide a rational explanation for the discrepancies generally observed in most of the BIAcore sensograms


Antigen association rate constant BIAcore high affinity monoclonal antibody non-dissociable 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Banerjee A, Srilatha N S and Murthy G S 2002 Real-time kinetic analysis of hCG-monoclonal antibody interaction using radiolabeled hCG probe: presence of two forms of Ag-mAb complex as revealed by solid phase dissociation studies;Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1569 21–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bornhauser S W, Eggenberger J, Jelesarov I, Bernard A, Berge C and Bosshard H R 1998 Thermodynamics and kinetics of the reaction of a single chain antibody fragment (scFv) with the leucine zipper domain of transcription factor GCN4;Biochemistry 37 13011–13020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chaiken I, Rose S and Karlsson R 1992 Analysis of macromolecular interactions using immobilized ligands;Anal. Biochem. 201 197–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Claudia A Lipschultz, Yili Li and Sandra Smith-Gill 2000 Experimental Design for analysis of Complex Kinetics Using Surface Plasmon Resonance;Methods 20 310–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kalinin N L, Ward L D and Winzor DJ 1995 Effects of solute multivalence on the evaluation of binding constants by biosensor technology: studies with concanavalin A and interleukin-6 as partitioning proteins;Anal. Biochem. 228 238–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Malmqvist M 1993 Biospecific interaction analysis using biosensor technology;Nature (London) 361 186–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McCloskey N, Turner M W and Goldblatt D 1997 Correlation between the avidity of mouse-human chimeric IgG subclass monoclonal antibodies measured by solid phase elution ELISA and biospecific interaction analysis BIA;J. Immunol. Methods 205 67–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Murthy G S and Moudgal N R 1986 Use of epoxysepharose for protein immobilization;J. Biosci. 10 351–358Google Scholar
  9. Muslin A J, Tanner W J, Allen P M and Shaw A S 1996 Interaction of 14-3-3 with signaling proteins is mediated by the recognition of phosphoserine;Cell 84 889–897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nieba L, Krebber L and Pluckthun A 1996 Competition BIAcore for measuring true affinities: large differences from values determined from binding kinetics;Anal. Biochem. 234 155–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pellequer J L and Van Regenmortel M H V 1993 Measurement of kinetic binding constants of viral antibodies using a new biosensor technology;J. Immunol. Methods 166 133–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Thomas C J and Surolia A 2000 Kinetic analysis of the binding of Ulex europeas agglutinin 1 (UEA 1) to H-antigenic fucolipid;Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 374 8–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Thomas C J, Surolia N and Surolia A 1999 Surface plasmon resonance studies resolve the enigmatic endotoxin neutralizing activity of polymyxin B;J. Biol. Chem. 274 29624–29627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Venkatesh N and Murthy G S 1997 Immunochemical approach to the mapping of an assembled epitope of human chrionic gonadotropin: proximity of CTP-α to the receptor binding region of the Β-subunit;J. Immunol. Methods 202 173–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Venkatesh N, Nagraja G and Murthy G S 1995 Analysis of a conformation specific epitope of the alpha subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin: Study using monoclonal antibody probes;Curr. Sci. 69 48–56Google Scholar
  16. Yamaji A, Sekizawa Y, Emoto K, Sakuraba H and Inoue K 1998 Lysenin a novel sphingomyelin specific binding protein;J. Biol. Chem. 273 5300–5306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Banerjee Ashish
    • 1
  • Gundlupet Satyanarayana Murthy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Molecular Reproduction, Development and GeneticsIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations