Abstract
More than ever, there is a need to integrate restoration ecology, as practiced by the scientific community, and ecological restoration, a province that is largely, but not entirely the purview of practitioners. Success in some coastal restoration projects is increasingly measured in the context of practioner skills and cultural goals rather than by the manifestation of underlying ecological principles and mechanisms in the restoration process. Especially in human-dominated landscapes, restoration practices should attempt to balance human needs with those of extant biota in a consensus based combination of restoration ecology and ecological restoration criteria. The goal is to devise plans at the appropriate scale that allow humans and other biota to share space and resources in an increasingly complex landscape. No matter where restoration takes place, both ecological fidelity (in ecocentric terms) and human dimensions (in anthropocentric terms) must comprise the restoration design, but ultimately in proportion to human density in the landscape. Without this integration, compromise, and balance, restoration will not likely prosper in the mainstream of society.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Literature Cited
Allen, T. F. H. andT. W. Hoekstra. 1992. Toward a Unified Ecology, 1st edition. Columbia University Press, New York.
Angermeier, P. L. andJ. R. Karr. 1994. Biological integrity versus biological diversity as policy directives.BioScience 44:690–697.
Cairns, Jr.,J. 1995. Ecosocietal restoration: Reestablishing humanity’s relationship with natural systems.Environment 37: 4–33.
Cairns, Jr.,J., K. L. Dickson, andE. E. Herricks (eds.). 1975. Recovery and Restoration of Damaged Ecosystems. University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Callicott, J. B., L. R. Crowder, andK. Mumford. 1999. Current normative concepts in conservation.Conservation Biology 13:22–35.
Goldstein, P. Z. 1999. Functional ecosystems and biodiversity buzzwords.Conservation Biology 13:247–255.
Gross, M. 2002. New natures and old science: Hands-on practice and academic research in ecological restoration.Science Studies 15:17–35.
Higgs, E. S. 1997. What good is ecological restoration?Conservation Biology 11:338–348.
Higgs, E. S. 2005. The two-culture problem: Ecological restoration and the integration of knowledge.Restoration Ecology 13: 159–164.
Hildebrand, R. H., A. C. Watts, andA. M. Randle. 2005. The myths of restoration ecology.Ecology and Society 10:19–29.
Hobbs, R. J. andJ. A. Harris. 2001. Restoration ecology: Repairing the earth’s ecosystems in the new millennium.Restoration Ecology 9:239–246.
Hobbs, R. J. andD. A. Norton. 1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology.Restoration Ecology 4:93–110.
Kirby, J. L. 1994. Gardening with J. Grew: The political economy of restoration ecology, p. 234–240.In A. D. J. Baldwin, J. DeLuce, and C. Pletsch (eds.), Beyond Preservation: Restoring and Inventing Landscapes. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
McDonnell, M. J. andS. T. A. Pickett (eds.). 1993. Humans as Components of Ecosystems: The Ecology of Subtle Human Effects and Populated Areas. Springer-Verlag, New York.
National Research Council (NRC). 1992. Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Technology and Public Policy. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Naveh, Z. 1994. From biodiversity to ecodiversity: A landscape-ecology approach to conservation and restoration.Restoration Ecology 2:180–189.
Pfadenhauer, J. 2001. Some remarks on the socio-cultural background of restoration ecology.Restoration Ecology 9:220–229.
Roe, E. andM. Van Eeten. 2001. Threshold-based resource management: A framework for comprehensive ecosystem management.Environmental Management 27:195–214.
Roe, E. andM. Van Eeten. 2002. Reconciling ecosystem rehabilitation and service reliability mandate in large technical systems: Findings and implications of three major US ecosystem management initiatives for managing human-dominated aquatic-terrestrial ecosystems.Ecosystems 5:509–528.
Swart, J. A. A., H. J. van der Windt, andJ. Keulartz. 2001. Valuation of nature in conservation and restoration.Restoration Ecology 9:230–238.
Van Diggelen, R., A. B. P. Grootjans, andJ. A. Harris. 2001. Ecological resotration: State of the art or state of the science.Restoration Ecology 9:115–118.
Weinstein, M. P. 2007. Ecological restoration and Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM): Placing humans in the coastal landscape.Journal of Applied Ecology In press.
Weinstein, M. P., R. C. Baird, D. O. Conover, M. Gross, J. Keulartz, D. K. Loomis, Z. Naveh, S. B. Peterson, D. J. Reed, E. Roe, R. L. Swanson, J. A. A. Swart, J. M. Teal, R. E. Turner, andH. J. van der Windt. 2007. Managing coastal resources in the 21st century.Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5:43–48.
Weinstein, M. P. andD. J. Reed. 2005. Sustainable coastal development: The dual mandate and a recommendation for “commerce managed areas”.Restoration Ecology 13:174–182.
Weinstein, M. P., J. M. Teal, J. H. Balletto, andK. A. Strait. 2001. Restoration principles emerging from one of the world’s largest tidal marsh restoration projects.Wetlands and Ecological Management 9:387–407.
Woodley, S. J., J. Kay, andG. Francis (eds.). 1993. Ecological Integrity and the Management of Ecosystems. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, Florida.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Weinstein, M.P. Linking restoration ecology and ecological restoration in estuarine landscapes. Estuaries and Coasts: JERF 30, 365–370 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02700179
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02700179