Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theory-driven comparative analysis: Dead on the gurney or lost in the shuffle?

  • Review Essay
  • Published:
Studies in Comparative International Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allison, Graham T. 1971.Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, Kenneth J. 1951.Social Choice and Individual Values. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • APSA-CP: Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section in Comparative Politics. 1997. Vol. 8, no. 1.

  • Bates, Robert H. 1997a. “Theory in Comparative Politics?”APSA-CP: Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section in Comparative Politics 8(1)Winter:1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1997b. “Area Studies and the Discipline: A Useful Controversy?”PS: Political Science & Politics 30(2):166–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1997c. “Area Studies and Political Science: Rupture and Possible Synthesis.”Africa Today 44(2):123–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1996. “Area Studies and the Discipline.”APSA-CP: Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section in Comparative Politics 7(1) Winter:1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, Robert H., Avner Greif, Margaret Levi, Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, and Barry R. Weingast. 1998.Analytic Narratives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, Jagdish N. 1978.Foreign Trade Regimes and Economic Development: Anatomy and Consequences of Exchange Control Regimes. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp, Roderic A. 1987. “The Political Technocrat in Mexico and the Survival of the Political System.”Latin American Research Review 20(1):97–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centeno, Miguel Angel. 1994.Democracy Within Reason: Technocratic Revolution in Mexico. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Youssef. 1994.Radicals, Reformers, and Reactionaries: The Prisoner’s Dilemma and the Collapse of Democracy in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, Jonathan. 1999. “Irrational Exuberance.”The New Republic, October 25, pp. 25–31.

  • Colander, David C. (Ed.) 1984.Neoclassical Political Economy: The Analysis of Rent-Seeking and DUP Activities. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Anthony. 1957.An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science.” InHandbook of Political Science, vol. 7, edited by Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, Jeffry A. 1985.Debt, Development and Democracy: Modern Political Economy in Latin America, 1965–1985. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, Alexander. 1997. “Knowledge for Statecraft: The Challenge for Political Science and History.”International Security 22(1):44–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourevitch, Peter. 1986.Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Donald, and Ian Shapiro. 1994.Pathologies of Rational Choice: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindle, Merilee S. 1996.Challenging the State: Crisis and Innovation in Latin America and Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1977. “Patrons and Clients in the Bureaucracy: Career Networks in Mexico.”Latin American Research Review 12(1):37–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, Stephan and Robert R. Kaufman. 1995.The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, Stephan and Steven B. Webb. 1993. “What Do We Know About the Political Economy of Economic Policy Reform?”The World Bank Research Observer 8(2):143–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter A. 1986.Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Chalmers. 1997. “Preconception vs. Observation, or the Contributions of Rational Choice Theory and Area Studies to Contemporary Political Science.”PS: Political Science & Politics 30(2) June:170–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1982.MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Chalmers, and E.B. Keehn. 1994. “A Disaster in the Making: Rational Choice and Asian Studies.”National Interest 36 (Summer): 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994.Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, Anne O. 1974. “The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society.”American Economic Review 64(3):291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, Deepak. 1984. “The Political Economy of the Predatory State” Discussion Paper 105. Washington, D.C.: Development Research Department, World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalman, David, Joe Oppenheimer, and Piotr Swistak. 1993. “Formal Rational Choice Theory: A Cumulative Science of Politics.” InPolitical Science: State of the Discipline II, edited by Ada W. Finifter. Washington, D.C.: American Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Margaret. 1997. “A Model, A Method and a Map: Rational Choice in Comparative and Historical Analysis.”APSA-CP: Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section in Comparative Politics 8(1) Winter:9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichbach, Mark I. 1997. “What is the Current State of Theory in Comparative Politics.”APSA-CP: Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section in Comparative Politics 8(1):14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Jr., Barrington. 1966.Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munck, Gerardo L. 1998. “Canons of Research Design in Qualitative Analysis.”Studies in Comparative International Development 33(3):138–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Joan M. 1993. “The Politics of Economic Transformation: Is Third World Experience Relevant in Eastern Europe?”World Politics 45 (April):433–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Joan M. (Ed.) 1990.Economic Crisis and Policy Choice: The Politics of Adjustment in the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo A. 1973.Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur. 1965.The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D., with Robert Leonardi and Rafaella Y. Nanetti. 1993.Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, Dani. 1996. “Understanding Economic Policy Reform.”Journal of Economic Literature 34 (March): 9–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronfeldt, David. 1988.Wither Elite Cohesion in Mexico: A Comment, P-7509. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, Jeffrey. 1994. “Life in the Economic Emergency Room.” InThe Political Economy of Policy Reform, edited by John Williamson. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Ian. 1998. “Can the Rational Choice Framework, Cope with Culture?”PS: Political Science & Politics 31(1):40–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, Christopher. 1997. “Political Scientists Clash Over Value of Area Studies.”The Chronicle of Higher Education, January 10, pp. A13–A14.

  • Shirley, Mary M. 1994. “Privatization in Latin America: Lessons for Transitional Europe.”World Development 22(9):1313–1323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda. 1995. “The Role of Theory in Comparative Politics: A Symposium.” 1995.World Politics 48 (October):1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1979.States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, T.N. 1985. “Neoclassical Political Economy: The State and Economic Development.”Politics and Society 17(2):115–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichman, Judith A. 1995.Privatization and Political Change in Mexico. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, George. 1990.Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Michael. 2000. “American Imperialism in Comparative Politics.”APSA-CP: Newsletter of the Organized Section in Comparative Politics of the American Political Science Association 11(1):1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walt, Stephen M. 1999. “Rigor or Rigor Mortis?”International Security 23(4) Spring:5–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, Barry R 1997. “Formal Theory and Comparative Politics.”ASPA-CP: Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section in Comparative Politics 8(1):6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Mark Eric. Forthcoming.Rethinking the Politics of Market Reforms: Coalitions, Institutions, and Policy Change in Mexico. Roman & Littlefield

  • Yashar, Deborah. 1997.Demanding Democracy: Reform and Reaction in Costa Rica and Guatemala, 1870s–1950s. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Mark Eric Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Mark Williams is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont 05753, and the author ofRethinking the Politics of Market Reforms:, Coalitions, Institutions and Policy Change in Mexico (forthcoming).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, M.E. Theory-driven comparative analysis: Dead on the gurney or lost in the shuffle?. St Comp Int Dev 35, 112–130 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02699768

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02699768

Keywords

Search

Navigation