The community of those who have nothing in common: Education and the language of responsibility

Abstract

In this paper I explore different ways to understand the idea of community. Using the work of Alphonso Lingis, I make a distinction between the rational community and the community of those who have nothing in common. The latter community is the community in which we are all strangers for each other. I argue that the language of the latter community is the language of responsibility. It is this language that enables us to speak with our own, unique and individual voice. I argue that education and educators should be concerned with the latter form of speaking. Therefore, the community without community, which exists as the interruption of the rational community, is the most important, and ultimately the only relevant educational community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Apple, M. W. (1979).Ideology and curriculum. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barnes, B. (1977).Interests and the growth of knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bailey, C. (1984).Beyond the present and the particular: A theory of liberal education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bauman, Z. (1993).Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bauman, Z. (2000).The Bauman reader (P. Beilharz, Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bernstein, R.J. (1983).Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Biesta, G.J.J. (1995). Postmodernism and the repoliticization of education.Interchange,26, 161–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Biesta, G.J.J. (1998). Pedagogy without humanism: Foucault and the subject of education.Interchange,29(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Biesta, G.J.J. (1999). Where are you? Where am I? Education, identity and the question of location. In C.A. Säfström (Ed.),Identity. Questioning the logic of identity within educational theory (pp. 21–45). Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Biesta, G.J.J. (2001a). Why Dewey now?Zeitschrift für pädagogische Historiographie,7(2), 71–75.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Biesta, G.J.J. (2001b). How difficult should education be?Educational Theory,51(4), 385–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Biesta, G.J.J. (2002). How general canBildung be? Reflections on the future of a modern educational ideal.British Journal of Philosophy of Education,36(3), 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Biesta, G.J.J. (2003). Demokrati — ett problem för utbildning eller ett utbildningsproblem?Utbildning & Demokrati,12, 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Biesta, G.J.J. (2004). Education, accountability and the ethical demand. Can the democratic potential of accountability be regained?Educational Theory,54(3), 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Biesta, G.J.J. & Burbules, N.C. (2003).Pragmatism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Biesta, G.J.J., & Egéa-Kuehne, D. (Eds.). (2001).Derrida & education. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bloor, D. (1976).Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Derrida, J. (1984). Deconstruction and the other. An interview with Jacques Derrida. In R. Kearney (Ed.),Dialogues with contemporary continental thinkers (pp. 105–126). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Derrida, J. (1992). Force of law: The ‘mystical foundation of authority.’ In D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld, & D. G. Carlson (Eds.),Deconstruction and the possibility of justice (pp. 3–67). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Derrida, J. (1997a). The Villanova roundtable. A conversation with Jacques Derrida. In J.D. Caputo (Ed.),Deconstruction in a nutshell (pp. 3–28). New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Derrida, J. (1997b).Politics of friendship. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dewey, J. (1980).The quest for certainty. New York: Perigree Books (Original work published 1929)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Foucault, M. (1966).Les mots et les choses. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gur Ze’ev, I. (2001). Philosophy of peace in a postmodern era.Educational Theory,51(3), 315–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lingis, A. (1994).The community of those who have nothing in common. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rikowski, G. (1996). Left alone: End time for Marxist educational theory?British Journal of Sociology of Education,17(4), 415–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rorty, R. (1980).Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Säfström, C.A. & Biesta, G.J.J. (2001). Learning democracy in a world of difference.The School Field,12(5/6), 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Usher, R. & Edwards, R. (1994).Postmodernism and education. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biesta, G. The community of those who have nothing in common: Education and the language of responsibility. Interchange 35, 307–324 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02698880

Download citation

Keywords

  • Community
  • responsibility
  • education
  • Alphonso Lingis
  • Zygmunt Bauman
  • postmodernism
  • communication
  • language
  • Emmanuel Levinas