Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Beyond the modern/postmodern debate, or how to live for the other?

  • Symposium
  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For whatever reason, we tend to believe that men or women can only be goaded or cajoled, by superior force or superior rhetoric, into peaceful coexistence. (Bauman, 1992, p. xvii)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauman, Z. (1992). Intimations of postmodernity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, S. (1999). The ethics of deconstruction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity. An essay on exteriority. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Teacher Training, Uppsala University, Box 2136, 750 02, Uppsala, Sweden

    Carl Anders Säfström

Authors
  1. Carl Anders Säfström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Säfström, C.A. Beyond the modern/postmodern debate, or how to live for the other?. Interchange 35, 303–305 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02698879

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02698879

Keywords

Search

Navigation