Skip to main content

Interaction of rheology, geometry, and process in coating flow

Abstract

A final coating of uniform thickness implies good leveling and the avoidance of defects during film formation. Though generally desired, this objective is often unmet. The outcome of a coating process depends on the nonlinear interaction of the rheology, process variables, and substrate geometry. Understanding the role of rheology is complicated by difficulties in linking fundamental rheological properties with coating performance. During a coating process, forces of varying type, magnitude and duration act on the fluid film. For non-Newtonian coatings the viscosity varies with both time and position within the coating layer, making predictions of flow behavior quite difficult. One answer is computer simulation, using numerical techniques to solve a set of nonlinear differential equations governing the flow. The rheological and other physical properties are parameter values for the program.

We present results of mathematical modeling and numerical simulation of a coating imperfection known as a “dripmark.” The model includes non-Newtonian rheology, substrate shape, surface tension, and gravity. We compare theoretical prediction with experimental observation in a study of two architectural paints. We also describe a new method of quantitatively measuring the surface profile of a coating defect.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Strivens, T.A., “The Rheology of Paints,” inPaint and Surface Coatings: Theory and Practice, Lambourne, R. and Strivens, T.A. (Eds.), 2nd ed., Woodhead Pub. Ltd., 1999.

  2. Schoff, C.K., “Surface Defects: Diagnosis and Cure,”Journal of Coatings Technology,71, No. 888, 56 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pierce, P.E. and Schoff, C.K., “Coating Film Defects,” 2nd Edition,Federation Series on Coatings Technology, Blue Bell, PA, 1994.

  4. Kornum, L.O. and Raaschou-Nielsen, H.K., “Surface Defects in Drying Paint Films,”Prog. Org. Coat., 8, 275 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bierwagen, G.P., “Surface Defects and Surface Flows in Coatings,”Prog. Org. Coat., 19 (1), 59 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weidner, D.E., Schwartz, L.W., and Eley, R.R., “Role of Surface Tension Gradients in Correcting Coating Defects in Corners,”J. Coll. & Interf. Sci., 179, 66–75 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Overdiep, W.S., “The Leveling of Paints,”Prog. Org. Coat., 14, 159 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson, S.K., “The Derivation and Analysis of a Model of the Drying Process of a Paint Film,”Surf. Coat. Int., 4, 162 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schwartz, L.W., Roy, R.V., Eley, R.R., and Petrash, S., “Dewetting Patterns in a Drying Liquid Film,”J. Coll. Interf. Sci., 234, 363–374 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoeflaak, M., “Edge Coverage and Rheological Behaviour of Coating Materials During Film Formation,”Surf. Coatings Australia, 6, July 1987.

  11. Bierwagen, G.P., “Surface Energetics,” Chap. 5.4 inASTM Paint and Coatings Testing Manual, 14th ed., Koleske, J. (Ed.), American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), West Conshohocken, PA, pp. 369–382, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klarskov, M., Jakobsen, J., and Saarnak, A., “Verification of the Orchard Leveling Analysis,”Rheology, 92, 30, March (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim, J.S., Kim, S., and Ma, F.,J. Appl. Phys., 73, 422–428 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bird, R.B., Armstrong, R.C., and Hassager, O.,Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids, Wiley, New York, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schwartz, L.W., Moussalli, P., Campbell, P., and Eley, R.R.,Trans. Inst. Chem. Engrs., 76, 22–29 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Weidner, D.E. and Schwartz, L.W., “Contact Line Motion of Shear-Thinning Fluids,”Phys. Fluids, 6 (11), 3535–3538 (1994).

    MATH  Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwartz, L.W. “Unsteady Simulation of Viscous Thin-Layer Flows,” inFree-Surface Flows with Viscosity, Tyvand, P. (Ed.), pp. 203–233, Computational Mech. Publ., Southampton, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Orchard, S.E.,Applied Scientific Research, Section A, Vol. 11, 451, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Peaceman, D.Fundamentals of Numerical Reservoir Simulation, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schwartz, L.W. and Eley, R.R., “Flow of Architectural Coatings on Complex Surfaces; Theory and Experiment,”J. Eng. Math. (2002), in press.

  21. Eley, R.R., “Rheology and Viscometry,” Chap. 33,ASTM Paint and Coatings Testing Manual, 14th ed., ASTM, Philadelphia, 333–368, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eley, R.R., “Principles and Methods of Rheology in Coatings,” inEncyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry: Instrumentation and Applications, Meyers, R.A. (Ed.), J. Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2001.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Strongsville Research Center, 16651 Sprague Rd., Strongsville, OH 44136.

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eley, R.R., Schwartz, L.W. Interaction of rheology, geometry, and process in coating flow. Journal of Coatings Technology 74, 43–53 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02697974

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02697974

Keywords

  • Shear Rate
  • Flow Curve
  • Paint Layer
  • Paint Film
  • Coating Flow