Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reader survey

  • Consultation Section
  • Published:
Annals of Ophthalmology

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. CMS Rulings. Ruling No. 05-01. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs. gov/Rulings/downloads/CMSR0501.pdf.May 3, 2005. Last accessed on January 22, 2007.

  2. Hoffman RS, Fine IH, Packer M. Targeting emmetropia in the cataract and lensectomy patient in Perspectives in Lens and IOL Surgery, Eye World 2001;6:86–87.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Javitt J, Brauweiler HP, Jacobi KW, et al. Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes. Multicenter clinical trial in Germany and Austria. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:1356–1366.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoffer KJ. Clinical results using the Holladay 2 intraocular lens power formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:1233–1237.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, et al. Immersion A scan compared to partial coherence interferometry: outcomes analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:239–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Findl O, Drexler W, Menapace R, et al. Improved prediction of intraocular lens power using partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:861–867.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rajan MS, Keilhorn I, Bell JA. Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations. Eye 2002;16:552–556.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tehrani M, Mamalis N, Hoffman RS, et al. Surgical correction of astigmatism. In JP Gills, ed.,A Complete Surgical Guide for Correcting Astigmatism: An Ophthalmic Manifesto, Slack, Inc., Thorofare, NJ, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nichamin LD. Management of astigmatism in conjunction with clear corneal phaco surgery. Available at http://www. sei-ascrs.org/pdfs/LRIhandoutNichamin.pdf.Last accessed November 19, 2006.

  10. Kaufmann, C, Peter J, Ooi K, et al. The Queen Elizabeth Astigmatism Study Group. Limbal relaxing incisions versus on-axis incisions to reduce corneal astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:2261–1265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Packer M, Brown LK, Hoffman RS, et al. Intraocular lens power calculation following incisional or thermal keratorefractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:1430–1434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Packer M. Frequency and risk factor analysis of piggyback IOL enhancement following refractive lens exchange with an accommodative IOL. Presented at Refractive Surgery 2006: The Times They Are A-Changin’. Sponsored by the International Society of Refractive Surgery of the American Academy of Ophthalmology (ISRS/AAO), November 11, 2006, Las Vegas, NV.

  13. Summary of safety and effectiveness data. Available at http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/pdf4/p040020b.pdf.Last accessed November 19, 2006.

  14. Leyland M, Zinicola E. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review. Ophthalmology 2003; 110:1789–1798.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alió JL, Tavolato M, De la Hoz F, et al. Near vision restoration with refractive lens exchange and pseudoaccommodating and multifocal refractive and diffractive intraocular lenses: comparative clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:2494–2503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hancox J, Spalton D, Heatley C, et al. Objective measurement of intraocular lens movement and dioptric change with a focus shift accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32:1098–1103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wolffsohn JS, Naroo SA, Motwani NK, et al. Subjective and objective performance of the Lenstec KH-3500 “accommodative” intraocular lens. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:693–696.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bucci FA. Intermediate and near visual function in bilateral multifocal cataract and lensectomy patients receiving ReZoom/ReSTOR. Presented at Refractive Surgery 2006: The Times They Are A-Changin’. Sponsored by the International Society of Refractive Surgery of the American Academy of Ophthalmology (ISRS/AAO), November 11, 2006, Las Vegas, NV.

  19. Hawker MJ, Madge SN, Baddeley PA, et al. Refractive expectations of patients having cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31:1970–1975.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee ES, Lee SY, Jeong SY, et al. Effect of postoperative refractive error on visual acuity and patient satisfaction after implantation of the Array multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31:1960–1965.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fine IH, Hoffman RS, Packer M. Perspectives in lens and IOL surgery: the new challenge for cataract surgeons. Available at http://www.eyeworld.org/article.php?sid=3486. Last accessed November 19, 2006.

  22. Fine IH, Packer M, Hoffman RS, eds.Refractive Lens Surgery. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Mark Packer MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Financial Disclosure Dr. Packer has a financial interest in any of the surgical instruments mentioned in this Consultation Section.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Packer, M. Reader survey. Ann Ophthalmol 39, 3–8 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02697319

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02697319

Keywords

Search

Navigation