Skip to main content
Log in

Application of combined coagulation-ultrafiltration membrane process for water treatment

  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objectives of this research are to identify the membrane fouling potential due to different fractions of NOM and correlate the physicochemical properties of NOM and membranes with the adsorption of humic substances on membrane and investigate the mechanism of coagulation affecting UF, and find the optimum conditions of the combined of coagulation with UF membrane filtration for NOM removal. For Nakdong river water, the humic acid fraction was the most reactive precursor fraction for the formation of the ratio of THMFP/DOC (STHMFP) and TOXFP/DOC (STOXFP). The result of adsorption kinetics tests showed that hydrophobic organics adsorbed much more quickly than hydrophilic organics on both membranes. Thus, hydrophobic compounds exhibited a preferential adsorption onto membrane. In case of the effect of membrane properties on the adsorption of organic fractions, the adsorption ratio (C1/Ce) was greater for the hydrophobic membrane than for the hydrophilic membrane regardless of the kind of organic fractions. For combined coagulation with membrane process, flux reduction rate showed lower than the UF process alone. Also, the rate of flux decline for the hydrophobic membrane was considerably greater than for the hydrophilic membrane. Applying the coagulation process before membrane filtration showed not only reduced membrane fouling, but also improved removal of dissolved organic materials that might otherwise not be removed by the membrane. That is, during the mixing period, substantial changes in particle size distribution occurred under rapid and slow mixing conditions due to the simultaneous formation of microflocs and NOM precipitates. Therefore, combined pretreatment using coagulation (both rapid mixing and slow mixing) improved not only dissolved organic removal efficiency but also DBP (Disinfection By-Product) precursor's removal efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DBPFP:

Disinfection By Product Formation Potential

STHMFP:

Specific Trihalomethane Formation Potential (Μg THMFP/mg DOC)

STOXFP:

Specific Total Organic Halogen Formation Potential (ΜgTOXFP/mgDOC)

MWCO:

Molecular Weight Cut Off

AMW:

Apparent Molecular Weight

SUVA:

Specific UV Absorbance (UV254/DOC)

C(t):

the amount of organics adsorbed at time [t]

C(e):

the amount which can adsorb on the membrane surface at equilibrium

J0 :

permeate flux of initial purewater

Ji :

permeate flux at each time [t]

G:

velocity gradient

UFC:

Uniform Formation Condition

References

  • Agbekodo, M. K., Legube, B. and Cote, P., “Organics in NF Permeate”,J. Am. Water Works. Assoc.,88(5), 67 (1996).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amicon Inc., Laboratory separation, Product catalog, publication, 716 (1987).

  • APHA-AWWA-WEF, “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater”, APHA-AWWA-WEF, 20th eds. (1998).

  • Cheryan, M., “Ultrafiltration Handbook”, Technomic Publishers, Lancaster, PA (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, M., Amy, G. and Steelink, C, “Molecular Weight Distribution, Carboxylic Acidity, and Humic Substances Content of Aquatic Organic Matter: Implications for Removal During Water Treatment”Environ. Sci. Technol.,20(10), 1028 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Croue, J. P., Martin, B., Deguin, A. and Legube, B., “Isolation and Characterization of Natural Organic Matter from Surface Water/Comparison of Resin Adsorption and Membrane Filtration Isolation Procedure”, Natural Organic Matter Workshop, Poitiers, France, September '96, 6 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuperus, F. P. and Smolders, C. A., “Characterization of Ultrafiltration Membranes: Membrane Characteristics and Characterization Techniques”,Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.,35, 135 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, P., Ruiz, H., Thompson, K. and Spangenberg, C., “Selecting Membranes for Removing NOM and DBP Precursors”,J. Am. Water Works. Assoc.,86(12), 55 (1994).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hermia, J., “Constant Pressure Blocking Filtration Laws: Application to Power-law Non-Newtonian Fluids”,Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng.,60, 183 (1982).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacangelo, J. G., Laine, J. M., Cummings, E. W. and Adham, S. S., “UF with Pretreatment for Removing DBP Precursors”,J. Am. Water Works. Assoc.,87(3), 100 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. W, Han, S. W. and Kang, L. S., “Characteristic of Organic Substances Adsorption onto Membrane Materials”,J. Kor. Soc. Environ. Eng.,24(n8), 1339 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. W., “Removal of Natural Organic Matter by Combined Coagulation-UF Membrane Process for Water Treatment/rd Ph. D., thesis, Department of Environmental Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, L. S., Han, S. W. and Jung, C. W., “Synthesis and Characterization of Polymeric Inorganic Coagulants for Water Treatment”,Korean J. Chem. Eng.,18(6), 965 (2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E. J., Jung, C W, Choi, S. H. and Kang, L. S., “The Influence of Rapid Mixing Condition on Coagulation in Water Treatment”J. Kor. Soc. Environ. Eng.,23(4), 631 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laine, J. M., Clark, M. M. and Mallevialle, J., “Ultrafiltration of Lake Water: Effects of Pretreatment on the Partitioning of Organics, THMFP, and Flux”,J. Am. Water Works. Assoc,82(12), 82 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laine, J. M., Hagstrom, J. P., Clark, M. M. and Mallevialle, J., “Effects of UF Membrane Composition”,J. Am. Water Works. Assoc.,81(11), 61 (1989).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lahoussine-Turcaud, V, Wiesner, M. R. and Bottero, J. Y., “Fouling in Tangential-flow Ultrafiltration: the Effect of Colloid Size and Coagulation Pretreatment”,J. Membrane. Sci.,52(2), 173 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. K. and Hong, J., “Characterization of Electric Charges in Microporous Membranes”,J. Membrane. Sci.,39(1), 79 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, B. E. and Jiang, Q., “Molecular Size Distribution of Dissolved Organic Matter”,J. Env. Engrg.,116(6), 1046 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, W L., Smith, J. C. and Harriott, P., “Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering” McGraw-Hill, New York, USA (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Summer, R S., Hooper, S. M., Shukairy, H. M., Solaril, G. and Owen, D., “Assessing DBP Yield: Uniform Formation Conditions”,J. Am. Water Works. Assoc,88(6), 80 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurman, E. and Malcolm, R., “Preparative Isolation of Aquatic Humic Substances”,Environ. Sci Technol.,15(4), 463 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tipping, E. and Ohnstad, M., “Aggregation of Aquatic Humic Substances”,Chem. Geol.,44, 349 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner, M. R., Lahoussine-Turcaud, V. and Fiessinger, F, “Organic Removal and Particle Formation using a Partially Neutralized A1C13”, In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Water Works Association, Denver, CO (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, W. and Zydney, A. L., “Humic Acid Fouling During Microfiltration”J. Membrane Sci.,157(1), 1 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lim-Seok Kang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jung, CW., Kang, LS. Application of combined coagulation-ultrafiltration membrane process for water treatment. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 20, 855–861 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02697288

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02697288

Key words

Navigation